Its not just about the money cwu said a no strings pay rise while backdooring the changes and siding what seems to be all the time with RM so called poverty-stricken I'm gonna go bankrupt mantra.norris9 wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 18:06Yeah, I have no idea why people are whining about the result, especially with the amount of people that were moaning about the last strikes we had and how much money they lost because of it.Edward Hunter wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 13:31what was the point it was always going to be accepted? Nobody would have been willing to strike in the hope of an extra %. It would have cost us more than we would gain in any case as the CWU agree that the company has no spare cash. Just need to get the "agreement" implimented to everyones satisfaction now. Im sure that will go smoothly![]()
Some posties would prefer to strike for 1% extra? The maths don't make any sense.![]()
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT
-
richietns
- Posts: 1070
- Joined: 17 Oct 2011, 18:09
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT
-
Sean06
- Posts: 2339
- Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT
Nobody can force people to vote.qwerty2 wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 18:16The point is over 50% in the union didn't bother voting on pay!!norris9 wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 18:06Yeah, I have no idea why people are whining about the result, especially with the amount of people that were moaning about the last strikes we had and how much money they lost because of it.Edward Hunter wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 13:31what was the point it was always going to be accepted? Nobody would have been willing to strike in the hope of an extra %. It would have cost us more than we would gain in any case as the CWU agree that the company has no spare cash. Just need to get the "agreement" implimented to everyones satisfaction now. Im sure that will go smoothly![]()
Some posties would prefer to strike for 1% extra? The maths don't make any sense.![]()
![]()
-
richietns
- Posts: 1070
- Joined: 17 Oct 2011, 18:09
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT
yeah we know.Sean06 wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 20:07Nobody can force people to vote.qwerty2 wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 18:16The point is over 50% in the union didn't bother voting on pay!!norris9 wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 18:06Yeah, I have no idea why people are whining about the result, especially with the amount of people that were moaning about the last strikes we had and how much money they lost because of it.Edward Hunter wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 13:31what was the point it was always going to be accepted? Nobody would have been willing to strike in the hope of an extra %. It would have cost us more than we would gain in any case as the CWU agree that the company has no spare cash. Just need to get the "agreement" implimented to everyones satisfaction now. Im sure that will go smoothly![]()
Some posties would prefer to strike for 1% extra? The maths don't make any sense.![]()
![]()
-
Sean06
- Posts: 2339
- Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT
So really your point is why did over 50% not vote.can you answer it? I certaintly cannot but how many people vote in a general election now.richietns wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 20:17yeah we know.Sean06 wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 20:07Nobody can force people to vote.qwerty2 wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 18:16The point is over 50% in the union didn't bother voting on pay!!norris9 wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 18:06Yeah, I have no idea why people are whining about the result, especially with the amount of people that were moaning about the last strikes we had and how much money they lost because of it.Edward Hunter wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 13:31what was the point it was always going to be accepted? Nobody would have been willing to strike in the hope of an extra %. It would have cost us more than we would gain in any case as the CWU agree that the company has no spare cash. Just need to get the "agreement" implimented to everyones satisfaction now. Im sure that will go smoothly![]()
Some posties would prefer to strike for 1% extra? The maths don't make any sense.![]()
![]()
-
menditsa
- Posts: 371
- Joined: 22 Jun 2024, 08:06
- Gender: Male
-
Jonathan Alsatian
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 10 Oct 2024, 21:00
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT
The CWU communication posted in the top post of this thread says "we will be issuing wider communications tomorrow on the EP Group/CWU agreement". That didn't happen. Unless I missed it.
-
ted_e_bear
- Posts: 3933
- Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT
There's a YouTube session today, might be some infoJonathan Alsatian wrote: ↑28 Aug 2025, 10:57The CWU communication posted in the top post of this thread says "we will be issuing wider communications tomorrow on the EP Group/CWU agreement". That didn't happen. Unless I missed it.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=117085
-
Scointer
- Posts: 36
- Joined: 03 Jun 2023, 14:11
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT
It is hereJonathan Alsatian wrote: ↑28 Aug 2025, 10:57The CWU communication posted in the top post of this thread says "we will be issuing wider communications tomorrow on the EP Group/CWU agreement". That didn't happen. Unless I missed it.
https://www.cwu.org/ltb/ltb-186-25-ep-g ... nt-update/
-
richietns
- Posts: 1070
- Joined: 17 Oct 2011, 18:09
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT
Apathy.Sean06 wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 23:14So really your point is why did over 50% not vote.can you answer it? I certaintly cannot but how many people vote in a general election now.richietns wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 20:17yeah we know.Sean06 wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 20:07Nobody can force people to vote.qwerty2 wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 18:16The point is over 50% in the union didn't bother voting on pay!!norris9 wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 18:06Yeah, I have no idea why people are whining about the result, especially with the amount of people that were moaning about the last strikes we had and how much money they lost because of it.Edward Hunter wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 13:31what was the point it was always going to be accepted? Nobody would have been willing to strike in the hope of an extra %. It would have cost us more than we would gain in any case as the CWU agree that the company has no spare cash. Just need to get the "agreement" implimented to everyones satisfaction now. Im sure that will go smoothly![]()
Some posties would prefer to strike for 1% extra? The maths don't make any sense.![]()
![]()
-
SkiSunday
- Posts: 790
- Joined: 05 Jan 2025, 18:19
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT
In simpler terms, laziness. Same as the workers on cushy numbers that would never work on delivery ain't that right Aiden01?richietns wrote: ↑28 Aug 2025, 16:27Apathy.Sean06 wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 23:14So really your point is why did over 50% not vote.can you answer it? I certaintly cannot but how many people vote in a general election now.richietns wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 20:17yeah we know.Sean06 wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 20:07Nobody can force people to vote.qwerty2 wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 18:16The point is over 50% in the union didn't bother voting on pay!!norris9 wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 18:06Yeah, I have no idea why people are whining about the result, especially with the amount of people that were moaning about the last strikes we had and how much money they lost because of it.Edward Hunter wrote: ↑27 Aug 2025, 13:31what was the point it was always going to be accepted? Nobody would have been willing to strike in the hope of an extra %. It would have cost us more than we would gain in any case as the CWU agree that the company has no spare cash. Just need to get the "agreement" implimented to everyones satisfaction now. Im sure that will go smoothly![]()
Some posties would prefer to strike for 1% extra? The maths don't make any sense.![]()
![]()