Separate systems. I expect that long term data from flat and packet sorting machines will eventually feed into the DTS data.yellowbelly wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025, 21:04The reason I assume is that the DTS and flats sorting systems are not digitally connected (someone in MC processing will know but it's all acronyms to me) at this time.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Update on the USO Pilot Units bulletin 1
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 11878
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Update on the USO Pilot Units bulletin 1
-
jessicarabbit
- Posts: 605
- Joined: 05 Nov 2009, 19:57
- Gender: Female
Re: Update on the USO Pilot Units bulletin 1
From what I've heard at the pilots. The DTS algorithm is still learning and randomly releases stuff even when there isn't a 1c with it. Apparently it needs 4-5 weeks of data before it trusts itself to only release the correct stuff when due. The result is that combined days are totally unplannnable so stuff in the mech tray which we are told must all be delivered looks suspiciously like it shouldn't and so managers are already taking decisions to cull the mail on the combined day and just focus on the tracked parcels again. The whole thing is chaotic at best and doesn't improve quality and costs the same if not more than what we are doing now.
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2757
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: Update on the USO Pilot Units bulletin 1
If someone can find the imagined £300m cost saving, could they please get a job in the HS2 accounts department asap.jessicarabbit wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025, 22:09From what I've heard at the pilots. The DTS algorithm is still learning and randomly releases stuff even when there isn't a 1c with it. Apparently it needs 4-5 weeks of data before it trusts itself to only release the correct stuff when due. The result is that combined days are totally unplannnable so stuff in the mech tray which we are told must all be delivered looks suspiciously like it shouldn't and so managers are already taking decisions to cull the mail on the combined day and just focus on the tracked parcels again. The whole thing is chaotic at best and doesn't improve quality and costs the same if not more than what we are doing now.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 11878
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Update on the USO Pilot Units bulletin 1
Can't be true.The DTS has been in place for well over a year and there hasn't and will not be ant changes to the algorithm.jessicarabbit wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025, 22:09From what I've heard at the pilots. The DTS algorithm is still learning and randomly releases stuff even when there isn't a 1c with it. Apparently it needs 4-5 weeks of data before it trusts itself to only release the correct stuff when due. The result is that combined days are totally unplannnable so stuff in the mech tray which we are told must all be delivered looks suspiciously like it shouldn't and so managers are already taking decisions to cull the mail on the combined day and just focus on the tracked parcels again. The whole thing is chaotic at best and doesn't improve quality and costs the same if not more than what we are doing now.
-
Mr Rush
- Posts: 2913
- Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
- Gender: Male
Re: Update on the USO Pilot Units bulletin 1
It appears to have been rolled out in late 2021. Anecdotally, its effects have been noticeable since the second half of 2023.SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025, 07:01The DTS has been in place for well over a year and there hasn't and will not be ant changes to the algorithm.
The machine stops.
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2757
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: Update on the USO Pilot Units bulletin 1
So for absolute clarity: are MCs releasing mail in exactly the same way as before any pilots, with the exception of separating 1c from 2c?
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 11878
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Update on the USO Pilot Units bulletin 1
No changes to the DTS. 1C and 2C (flats and manual letters) sorted into separate trays, white labels for 1C, white with green stripes labels for 2C. Both 1C and 2C trays to go onto the same yorks.
We've already got the new 2C labels so in effect the MC side has already gone live.
-
SkiSunday
- Posts: 790
- Joined: 05 Jan 2025, 18:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Update on the USO Pilot Units bulletin 1
Are small packets still classed as flats?SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025, 19:44No changes to the DTS. 1C and 2C (flats and manual letters) sorted into separate trays, white labels for 1C, white with green stripes labels for 2C. Both 1C and 2C trays to go onto the same yorks.
We've already got the new 2C labels so in effect the MC side has already gone live.
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 11878
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
-
SkiSunday
- Posts: 790
- Joined: 05 Jan 2025, 18:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Update on the USO Pilot Units bulletin 1
We never see any of these in trays though unless they are A4 sized envelopes, so why are they classed as 'flats?' Is it because we used to put A4 bulky letters in our bags 25 years ago?SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025, 20:04A good few are, even though they pass through the system as packets. Large letter is maximum 45cm x 35cm x 16cm and upto 2kg
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 11878
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Update on the USO Pilot Units bulletin 1
That's the size limit:SkiSunday wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025, 20:08We never see any of these in trays though unless they are A4 sized envelopes, so why are they classed as 'flats?' Is it because we used to put A4 bulky letters in our bags 25 years ago?SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025, 20:04A good few are, even though they pass through the system as packets. Large letter is maximum 45cm x 35cm x 16cm and upto 2kg
https://help.royalmail.com/personal/s/a ... ight-guide
-
ted_e_bear
- Posts: 3865
- Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
- Gender: Male
Re: Update on the USO Pilot Units bulletin 1
That's small parcel sizing, see below for clarificationSpacePhoenix wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025, 20:04A good few are, even though they pass through the system as packets. Large letter is maximum 45cm x 35cm x 16cm and upto 2kg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
SkiSunday
- Posts: 790
- Joined: 05 Jan 2025, 18:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Update on the USO Pilot Units bulletin 1
ted_e_bear wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025, 20:44That's small parcel sizing, see below for clarificationSpacePhoenix wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025, 20:04A good few are, even though they pass through the system as packets. Large letter is maximum 45cm x 35cm x 16cm and upto 2kg
Screenshot_20250702-204219.png
Screenshot_20250702-204233.png
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 11878
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Update on the USO Pilot Units bulletin 1
The link I posted is RM's own website and it lists large letters as up to 2Kgted_e_bear wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025, 20:44That's small parcel sizing, see below for clarificationSpacePhoenix wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025, 20:04A good few are, even though they pass through the system as packets. Large letter is maximum 45cm x 35cm x 16cm and upto 2kg
Screenshot_20250702-204219.png
Screenshot_20250702-204233.png
-
ted_e_bear
- Posts: 3865
- Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
- Gender: Male
Re: Update on the USO Pilot Units bulletin 1
No it doesn't that's small parcels look againSpacePhoenix wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025, 21:42The link I posted is RM's own website and it lists large letters as up to 2Kgted_e_bear wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025, 20:44That's small parcel sizing, see below for clarificationSpacePhoenix wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025, 20:04A good few are, even though they pass through the system as packets. Large letter is maximum 45cm x 35cm x 16cm and upto 2kg
Screenshot_20250702-204219.png
Screenshot_20250702-204233.png