ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Query about contract and driving.

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
Ren Hoëk
Posts: 737
Joined: 01 Feb 2018, 12:19
Gender: Male

Query about contract and driving.

Post by Ren Hoëk »

Iv had a gander through my contract and nowhere does it state I am to drive for Royal Mail. Does anyone know what distinction is made between a driving and non driving contract?

The position states Postman/Postwoman.

Iv been with RM for getting on 16 years.

How is it people can be employed with RM and not drive even if they hold a license?

If I hold one of those contracts which doesnt require me to drive can I refuse to drive for RM any longer? As I see it I would be working above and beyond my contract.
chickenwittle
Posts: 2084
Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 09:43
Gender: Male

Re: Query about contract and driving.

Post by chickenwittle »

Ren Hoëk wrote:
27 Jun 2025, 14:46
Iv had a gander through my contract and nowhere does it state I am to drive for Royal Mail. Does anyone know what distinction is made between a driving and non driving contract?

The position states Postman/Postwoman.

Iv been with RM for getting on 16 years.

How is it people can be employed with RM and not drive even if they hold a license?

If I hold one of those contracts which doesnt require me to drive can I refuse to drive for RM any longer? As I see it I would be working above and beyond my contract.
Have you done the change over and do you currently drive for Royal Mail ?
tramssirhc
Posts: 1640
Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
Gender: Male

Re: Query about contract and driving.

Post by tramssirhc »

Ren Hoëk wrote:
27 Jun 2025, 14:46
Iv had a gander through my contract and nowhere does it state I am to drive for Royal Mail. Does anyone know what distinction is made between a driving and non driving contract?

The position states Postman/Postwoman.

Iv been with RM for getting on 16 years.

How is it people can be employed with RM and not drive even if they hold a license?

If I hold one of those contracts which doesnt require me to drive can I refuse to drive for RM any longer? As I see it I would be working above and beyond my contract.
If your contract requires you to drive it will state clearly that you are required to drive. Somd contracts say '..… with driving'. If your contract does not require you to drive then you maybe able to withdraw your consent to drive. Outright refusal without notice will be unreasonable and a potential breach of contract. The best course of action is to discuss the contractual agreement with the employer.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
fb1969
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1693
Joined: 29 Aug 2012, 08:38
Gender: Male
Location: hiding on the backstreets

Re: Query about contract and driving.

Post by fb1969 »

I joined in September 2012 and it was part of the contract then, so you must have joined just before they added it. As above, if you have driven for RM despite it not being in your contract you could be on dodgy ground if you now refused to do so - by doing it in the past it means that you have accepted it as part of your job.
Royal Mail
failing the workforce, failing the public and deliberately failing mail on a daily basis for too many years.
Mr Rush
Posts: 3069
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
Gender: Male

Re: Query about contract and driving.

Post by Mr Rush »

Circa 2010 when P&L was nationally rolled out is when the contracts changed. If you do not currently drive and your contract does not specify it then you are a non-driver until such time as you consent to drive.

If you drove a private car on delivery before that then you're boned, but then you'd know that from being made to drive for the last 15 years.
The machine stops.
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3190
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: Query about contract and driving.

Post by Acca Dacca »

The truth is if your office is short of drivers and needs you to drive then they will make life difficult to come off the driving - probably threaten to send you to another unit

If your office has enough drivers and it makes no difference if you are the non driver in a van share because there is no need for 2 drivers as only one can drive the van each day then you *might* be able to without much fuss
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
Pidleypoo
Posts: 697
Joined: 17 Dec 2014, 10:05
Gender: Male

Re: Query about contract and driving.

Post by Pidleypoo »

As far as I know , if you’ve done the changeover then you’re a Royal Mail driver even if your contract doesn’t state it.

Like you it isn’t in my contract but I’ve never done a changeover or driven a Royal Mail vehicle in any capacity.
tramssirhc
Posts: 1640
Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
Gender: Male

Re: Query about contract and driving.

Post by tramssirhc »

Lets be crystal clear. There is no such thing as a 'non-driver'. Workers are either contracted to drive or they are not contracted to drive. The CWU calling workers non-drivers has caused division.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
Perseus
Posts: 959
Joined: 21 Feb 2024, 16:45
Gender: Male

Re: Query about contract and driving.

Post by Perseus »

tramssirhc wrote:
27 Jun 2025, 18:14
Lets be crystal clear. There is no such thing as a 'non-driver'. Workers are either contracted to drive or they are not contracted to drive. The CWU calling workers non-drivers has caused division.
The CWU signing up for these pilots over 6 months ago and only now realising that thousands of staff don’t drive is amateur at best. Their solution? Ask people why they don’t want to drive for RM.
qwerty2
Posts: 1980
Joined: 30 Jun 2009, 00:42
Gender: Male

Re: Query about contract and driving.

Post by qwerty2 »

Perseus wrote:
27 Jun 2025, 18:25
tramssirhc wrote:
27 Jun 2025, 18:14
Lets be crystal clear. There is no such thing as a 'non-driver'. Workers are either contracted to drive or they are not contracted to drive. The CWU calling workers non-drivers has caused division.
The CWU signing up for these pilots over 6 months ago and only now realising that thousands of staff don’t drive is amateur at best. Their solution? Ask people why they don’t want to drive for RM.
I don't want to drive for anybody
I'm 55 don't want to learn now - too many idiots on the roads
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3190
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: Query about contract and driving.

Post by Acca Dacca »

Perseus wrote:
27 Jun 2025, 18:25
tramssirhc wrote:
27 Jun 2025, 18:14
Lets be crystal clear. There is no such thing as a 'non-driver'. Workers are either contracted to drive or they are not contracted to drive. The CWU calling workers non-drivers has caused division.
The CWU signing up for these pilots over 6 months ago and only now realising that thousands of staff don’t drive is amateur at best. Their solution? Ask people why they don’t want to drive for RM.
Why is the blame just at the CWU's door and not Royal Mail's? The business knew exactly how many of their workers didnt have licenses before coming up with the idea.
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
Judgee
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 2259
Joined: 23 Oct 2007, 15:18

Re: Query about contract and driving.

Post by Judgee »

Driving isn't in my contract. I was pushed into driving a few years back when I didn't really want to do it. Later on I withdrew from driving and there was nothing they could do about it as it was not in my contract!

If it's not in your contract and you don't want to do it just withdraw from it! :cuppa
Union what Union? Do we have a union?
Perseus
Posts: 959
Joined: 21 Feb 2024, 16:45
Gender: Male

Re: Query about contract and driving.

Post by Perseus »

Acca Dacca wrote:
27 Jun 2025, 18:50
Perseus wrote:
27 Jun 2025, 18:25
tramssirhc wrote:
27 Jun 2025, 18:14
Lets be crystal clear. There is no such thing as a 'non-driver'. Workers are either contracted to drive or they are not contracted to drive. The CWU calling workers non-drivers has caused division.
The CWU signing up for these pilots over 6 months ago and only now realising that thousands of staff don’t drive is amateur at best. Their solution? Ask people why they don’t want to drive for RM.
Why is the blame just at the CWU's door and not Royal Mail's? The business knew exactly how many of their workers didnt have licenses before coming up with the idea.
Because the union is being tasked with making it work to prevent job losses. I don't think the company cares if it works or not - and if the latter it pushes for a 3 day a week service.
theargyspy
Posts: 252
Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 17:02
Gender: Male
Location: UK

Re: Query about contract and driving.

Post by theargyspy »

Acca Dacca wrote:
27 Jun 2025, 18:50
Perseus wrote:
27 Jun 2025, 18:25
tramssirhc wrote:
27 Jun 2025, 18:14
Lets be crystal clear. There is no such thing as a 'non-driver'. Workers are either contracted to drive or they are not contracted to drive. The CWU calling workers non-drivers has caused division.
The CWU signing up for these pilots over 6 months ago and only now realising that thousands of staff don’t drive is amateur at best. Their solution? Ask people why they don’t want to drive for RM.
Why is the blame just at the CWU's door and not Royal Mail's? The business knew exactly how many of their workers didnt have licenses before coming up with the idea.
Not sure how you have come to the conclusion that " The business knew exactly how many of their workers didn't have licenses before coming up with the idea" How an earth could they possibly know? they are only now starting to get an idea by asking the Non drivers if they have a licence or not, which would suggest to me they had no idea before that or they wouldn't be asking!
"Never have I known an employee so keen to employ you, then so eager to get rid of you!"
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3190
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: Query about contract and driving.

Post by Acca Dacca »

theargyspy wrote:
27 Jun 2025, 19:17
Acca Dacca wrote:
27 Jun 2025, 18:50
Perseus wrote:
27 Jun 2025, 18:25
tramssirhc wrote:
27 Jun 2025, 18:14
Lets be crystal clear. There is no such thing as a 'non-driver'. Workers are either contracted to drive or they are not contracted to drive. The CWU calling workers non-drivers has caused division.
The CWU signing up for these pilots over 6 months ago and only now realising that thousands of staff don’t drive is amateur at best. Their solution? Ask people why they don’t want to drive for RM.
Why is the blame just at the CWU's door and not Royal Mail's? The business knew exactly how many of their workers didnt have licenses before coming up with the idea.
Not sure how you have come to the conclusion that " The business knew exactly how many of their workers didn't have licenses before coming up with the idea" How an earth could they possibly know? they are only now starting to get an idea by asking the Non drivers if they have a licence or not, which would suggest to me they had no idea before that or they wouldn't be asking!
Ok well they knew how many have never driven for Royal Mail AT ALL since joining
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next