I thought the whole office had to vote on which option, that 2 in 5 is apparently what all the initial trial offices chose
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
-
ted_e_bear
- Posts: 3865
- Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
-
claretandblue
- Posts: 873
- Joined: 01 Aug 2007, 12:14
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
Like I've said, we haven't been given a choice, our walks are too big, the only way to make it work is longer days.ted_e_bear wrote: ↑13 May 2025, 19:01I thought the whole office had to vote on which option, that 2 in 5 is apparently what all the initial trial offices chose
-
Perseus
- Posts: 839
- Joined: 21 Feb 2024, 16:45
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
oh, I'm 90% sure we won't be getting a choice. It will be 'computer says', and the thing is, the CWU know that.
-
norris9
- Posts: 2576
- Joined: 27 Feb 2019, 17:32
- Gender: Female
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
Tony Bouch has 1 job and he better get it right otherwise they might as well sack him off.
Make sure the workload fits within our time otherwise the USO is going to be failed and workers are going to be stressed out.
How hard is it for Royal Mail and the CWU to make duties fit within our time....
If they can't do that then the only option is to setup job and finish and we have limits on what we take out with us. None of this nonsense that management do where they force us to take everything out with us or hand us lapsing when it clearly can not be done.
Make sure the workload fits within our time otherwise the USO is going to be failed and workers are going to be stressed out.
How hard is it for Royal Mail and the CWU to make duties fit within our time....
If they can't do that then the only option is to setup job and finish and we have limits on what we take out with us. None of this nonsense that management do where they force us to take everything out with us or hand us lapsing when it clearly can not be done.
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 11878
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
Won't job and finish just make the situation worse? People will belt around their walks, making some walks look achievable, resulting in RM ripping hours out of offices?norris9 wrote: ↑14 May 2025, 17:18Tony Bouch has 1 job and he better get it right otherwise they might as well sack him off.
Make sure the workload fits within our time otherwise the USO is going to be failed and workers are going to be stressed out.
How hard is it for Royal Mail and the CWU to make duties fit within our time....
If they can't do that then the only option is to setup job and finish and we have limits on what we take out with us. None of this nonsense that management do where they force us to take everything out with us or hand us lapsing when it clearly can not be done.
-
jbo5066
- Posts: 356
- Joined: 06 Nov 2016, 14:31
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
2 in 5 wasn't an option for our office, only offered 2 in 6 or 9 day - we chose 2 in 6 - we still get fri/sat off one week with that, then sat/ Mon week after ...ted_e_bear wrote: ↑13 May 2025, 19:01I thought the whole office had to vote on which option, that 2 in 5 is apparently what all the initial trial offices chose
-
hans solo
- Posts: 3237
- Joined: 06 Feb 2011, 18:08
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
That should be fast tracked to area and national level
They have got to offer you alternate options
All in their agreement
They have got to offer you alternate options
All in their agreement
-
hans solo
- Posts: 3237
- Joined: 06 Feb 2011, 18:08
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
UPDATE AYR PILOT
31 duties failing massively monday
Workloads unachievable
No savings to be made from uso change
In fact request going in for another 6 duties to be made up
Going to cost RM more not less
Still using extra staff and cant even get holiday leave covered
Absolute shambles and chaos
Newton mearns also asking for extra duties due to unachievable workloads
RM have grossly underestimated mail volumes
31 duties failing massively monday
Workloads unachievable
No savings to be made from uso change
In fact request going in for another 6 duties to be made up
Going to cost RM more not less
Still using extra staff and cant even get holiday leave covered
Absolute shambles and chaos
Newton mearns also asking for extra duties due to unachievable workloads
RM have grossly underestimated mail volumes
-
jbo5066
- Posts: 356
- Joined: 06 Nov 2016, 14:31
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
Because of the demographic of our office other options weren't available - if I remember right, an office full of drivers got the full choice of all the available options...
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2757
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
They have. They have also miscalculated the cost and complexity of the change they’ve been trying to shoe horn in.hans solo wrote: ↑14 May 2025, 18:55UPDATE AYR PILOT
31 duties failing massively monday
Workloads unachievable
No savings to be made from uso change
In fact request going in for another 6 duties to be made up
Going to cost RM more not less
Still using extra staff and cant even get holiday leave covered
Absolute shambles and chaos
Newton mearns also asking for extra duties due to unachievable workloads
RM have grossly underestimated mail volumes
They’ll have to admit it’s a mistake soon.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
Perseus
- Posts: 839
- Joined: 21 Feb 2024, 16:45
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
The CWU went into this without checking specific office demographics. People have been saying from the start you need 100% driving staff, practically, to get the best choices.
-
Mr Rush
- Posts: 2913
- Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
Well they changed how they counted volumes well over 15 years ago so it's entirely possible statistics and reality have massively deviated since then, but really RM relentlessly overestimates what its staff can achieve/suffer daily.
The machine stops.
-
TopperGas
- Posts: 3150
- Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
It's fairly obvious to posties on the coalface that it's virtually impossible to deliver double mail every single day of the week, make it triple or more on some days and it's a non starter. The original suggestion of cutting existing duties by 20% made far more sense.
This is also probably the quieter periods of the year, what's it going to be like Black Friday onwards??
This is also probably the quieter periods of the year, what's it going to be like Black Friday onwards??
-
Pidleypoo
- Posts: 692
- Joined: 17 Dec 2014, 10:05
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
100 percent agree with this.TopperGas wrote: ↑16 May 2025, 13:16It's fairly obvious to posties on the coalface that it's virtually impossible to deliver double mail every single day of the week, make it triple or more on some days and it's a non starter. The original suggestion of cutting existing duties by 20% made far more sense.
This is also probably the quieter periods of the year, what's it going to be like Black Friday onwards??
From say September to may we've only been able to do one of our deliveries and the tracked off the other in our van share and I’d say a good 50 percent of that time we didn’t even do one full duty.
Only the last couple of weeks have we managed 1 and 1/4 on some days one and a half on other days.
No matter how well or bad these trials are currently going , the real test is from autumn pressure onwards.
-
Ashley’s
- Posts: 44
- Joined: 16 May 2018, 18:59
- Gender: Female
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
Am I correct in anticipating that once we transition to the three of us working together, we'll all have different days off? Currently, we share the same day off with our partner, but would I bejbo5066 wrote: ↑14 May 2025, 18:132 in 5 wasn't an option for our office, only offered 2 in 6 or 9 day - we chose 2 in 6 - we still get fri/sat off one week with that, then sat/ Mon week after ...ted_e_bear wrote: ↑13 May 2025, 19:01I thought the whole office had to vote on which option, that 2 in 5 is apparently what all the initial trial offices chose
correct in
saying this will change?