I haven't seen in person Amazon doing an age verification, but an Amazon box that someone was re-using
when I collected on delivery had 'Age Verification' on it.
I haven't seen in person Amazon doing an age verification, but an Amazon box that someone was re-using
Amazon have been doing AVD for many years. Could be wrong but I think it started first for Fresh deliveries before being rolled out to Logistics thereafter. As Oypostie says though, these days they just dump awkward stuff like AVDs, OTPs, massive boxes that split immediately, etc, etc, to RM and others, keeping the easy-to-deliver stuff “in-house”.yellowbelly wrote: ↑24 Apr 2025, 19:36I haven't seen in person Amazon doing an age verification, but an Amazon box that someone was re-using
when I collected on delivery had 'Age Verification' on it.
I'm a cynical old get and I reckon RM probably give Amazon a reduced price for delivering their stuff maybe they have to commit to a certain amount but as we're all aware it's mainly the stuff they don't deem as easy/profitable, perhaps the new owner will put a stop to that as well by increasing the priceA2B wrote: ↑24 Apr 2025, 18:48Aren't RM obligated to deliver it under the current USO?Londonsburning wrote: ↑24 Apr 2025, 18:40You have to remember RM have always been happy to take any Amazon overspill. It's purely profit driven.kazardaimenu wrote: ↑24 Apr 2025, 07:09Amazon pass all the stuff they don’t want on to us and also deliver postable packages so their numbers will be quicker than our drivers regardless of doorstepping.
Maybe RM will constantly increase the cost to customers like they did with letters to stop these pesky customers sending them
If you or I ran a company in a country that supplied a USO why wouldn't you use the service to your advantage? It's the same problem, RM has to provide a "service" at the moment while also making a profit, interesting to see how things will changeted_e_bear wrote: ↑24 Apr 2025, 21:23I'm a cynical old get and I reckon RM probably give Amazon a reduced price for delivering their stuff maybe they have to commit to a certain amount but as we're all aware it's mainly the stuff they don't deem as easy/profitable, perhaps the new owner will put a stop to that as well by increasing the priceA2B wrote: ↑24 Apr 2025, 18:48Aren't RM obligated to deliver it under the current USO?Londonsburning wrote: ↑24 Apr 2025, 18:40You have to remember RM have always been happy to take any Amazon overspill. It's purely profit driven.kazardaimenu wrote: ↑24 Apr 2025, 07:09Amazon pass all the stuff they don’t want on to us and also deliver postable packages so their numbers will be quicker than our drivers regardless of doorstepping.
Maybe RM will constantly increase the cost to customers like they did with letters to stop these pesky customers sending them
We are allowed and quite honestly encouraged to replicate Amazon delivery methods though, until we are not...oypostie wrote: ↑25 Apr 2025, 17:23I agree Amazon are quite entitled to work the system to their benefit. It's not fair but thems the rules. What i do disagree with is RM managers expecting drivers to work at Amazon speed when they cherry pick what they deliver and we're not officially allowed to replicate their delivery methods i.e, doorstep everything
From where are management obtaining Amazon's figures? Are those Amazon's self-stated ones? So they'll be about as trustworthy as RM's own PR BS.
There was a guy on an rm chat Facebook page reckons he does 250-300 a day in his shift hours. Worked out to about 50 parcels an hourLondonsburning wrote: ↑25 Apr 2025, 19:16I'm sure someone on here even said they were delivering 200 parcels a shift ha ha![]()
or maybe he has a company which generates about 249 returns a dayThere was a guy on an rm chat Facebook page reckons he does 250-300 a day
You were exactly right - it's a complete waste of time!Flashman_ wrote: ↑19 Apr 2025, 04:42We have been doing it for a while. It kind of sucks, firstly they time the routes without allowing time to get to and from delivery area, so I get more than I can do. I get several mis sorts, either in the wrong route or house number or even completely the wrong address entered into the system(usually house numbers wrong) so if you are following the PDA as listed, you end up stopping at the wrong address. In-flight items that are clearly labelled to go to a local collect like the PO are ignored by whoever is sorting so they are listed on the manifest in the wrong position or should be on an other route. I find I now have to go outside of my usual route, which I have almost never had to do before, despite seeing other drivers doing streets which are on my route, meaning we are crossing each other. The route planning software is still s**t, and ignoring logical delivery order or expecting you to turn around where its just not practical or safe.
This was meant to be more efficient, and stop drivers having to scan and sort items, but they still expect you to scan it to load it in order onto the van, so in practice I am spending exactly the same amount of time loading as it took me to scan sort and load before. Bunch of f***ing halfwit desk jockeys came up with this BS.
They won't last longSomeone saw some sense.