Exactly this , despite a few non drivers on here saying they don’t want mon to fri, that is the solution and everyone knows it.Acca Dacca wrote: ↑15 Apr 2025, 19:12They do fit.Woody Guthrie wrote: ↑15 Apr 2025, 18:44The whole thing is just cobbled together on the back of a fag packet.
The truth is pretty blunt, non-drivers don't particularly fit into this new model and the union is pretty much willing to throw them under a bus to get this version of USO reform over the line
The narrative is there, Martin keeps telling the same story, there are only 6,000 non drivers, 60% without a license however obviously the non-drivers in London will need special consideration....
Monday - Friday
I know you say you wouldnt want it and be careful what you wish for but ive not spoken to a non driver who wouldnt want Mon - Fri
Its seems to be about placating the drivers under the guise of fairness rather than simply getting the USO reform over the line.
RM would agree to non drivers doing Monday-Friday as they know its the logical shift pattern
Anything else is simply trying to fit round pegs in square holes
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
-
chickenwittle
- Posts: 2063
- Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 09:43
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
-
Mr Rush
- Posts: 2913
- Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
Martin had previously stated:
It's possible the numbers being supplied from branches have since been updated.Martin Walsh wrote: ↑05 Apr 2025, 14:56On Non Drivers there are 8400 non drivers out of 60 thousand Delivery Staff.
The machine stops.
-
jessicarabbit
- Posts: 605
- Joined: 05 Nov 2009, 19:57
- Gender: Female
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
1000s of legacy contracts will then simply refuse to do the 6 monthly checks on their licence to get the Mon-Fri attendance and the whole business will collapse like a flan in cupboard.
-
Acca Dacca
- Posts: 3178
- Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
It states;
''There is estimated to be circa 8,400 non-drivers in delivery out of over 83,000 delivery staff. 60% of that number do not have a driving license''
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
-
Perseus
- Posts: 839
- Joined: 21 Feb 2024, 16:45
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
And probably another 40,000 staff who drive but don't contractually need to.
There isn't a single person in our office who doesn't drive that wouldn't take a permanent Mon-Fri regardless of the 2-3 days mail issue. Not one.
Same with just about every other member of staff, barring a few who aren't bothered.
-
Broxi51
- Posts: 1154
- Joined: 30 Jul 2007, 19:04
- Location: Scotland
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
The pilots are struggling during a quiet period, what chance Xmas?
The time has come to stop turning the other cheek, time to stop shaking our heads in bitter dismay, time to stop mumbling our angry words.
The time has come for union.
The time has come for union.
-
Acca Dacca
- Posts: 3178
- Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
There would be the risk that should it ever transpire that thousands of people suddenly stopped doing something they were doing for years on a 'custom and practise' basis it could be argued by Royal Mail to be a form of industrial action.jessicarabbit wrote: ↑15 Apr 2025, 20:161000s of legacy contracts will then simply refuse to do the 6 monthly checks on their licence to get the Mon-Fri attendance and the whole business will collapse like a flan in cupboard.
Maybe not. But I dont think theyd make it easy.
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
-
Phantom
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: 27 Dec 2007, 18:17
- Gender: Female
- Location: New York
-
jessicarabbit
- Posts: 605
- Joined: 05 Nov 2009, 19:57
- Gender: Female
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
I did job and finish for 20 years as my custom and practice. Things change. I no longer want to drive for RM as I don't feel safe and my contract doesn't require me to.
Fire and Rehire is the only way they can force 50,000 people to drive.
Fire and Rehire is the only way they can force 50,000 people to drive.
-
Pidleypoo
- Posts: 692
- Joined: 17 Dec 2014, 10:05
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
The union should just come out and say that they’re going to throw non-drivers under the bus.
If the only way to reduce fatigue for them is to be indoors on a Saturday ( which will never ever happen ) then why are they suggesting that they could be outdoors on Saturdays also ? Absolutely gormless .
If the only way to reduce fatigue for them is to be indoors on a Saturday ( which will never ever happen ) then why are they suggesting that they could be outdoors on Saturdays also ? Absolutely gormless .
-
Acca Dacca
- Posts: 3178
- Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
.
Last edited by Acca Dacca on 15 Apr 2025, 20:58, edited 1 time in total.
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
-
Perseus
- Posts: 839
- Joined: 21 Feb 2024, 16:45
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
If someone is working indoors on a Saturday, or part of a 2 in a van out doing parcels then they would both come with a day off during the week, (eg Wednesday) thus breaking the Mon-Fri slog and help with fatigue. No?Pidleypoo wrote: ↑15 Apr 2025, 20:40The union should just come out and say that they’re going to throw non-drivers under the bus.
If the only way to reduce fatigue for them is to be indoors on a Saturday ( which will never ever happen ) then why are they suggesting that they could be outdoors on Saturdays also ? Absolutely gormless .
Not a very efficient way of doing things, but surely better than a Mon-Fri walking role doing 2-3 days mail every day?
-
Pidleypoo
- Posts: 692
- Joined: 17 Dec 2014, 10:05
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
Non drivers will be walking further and for longer even under the method you’ve suggested here.Perseus wrote: ↑15 Apr 2025, 20:54If someone is working indoors on a Saturday, or part of a 2 in a van out doing parcels then they would both come with a day off during the week, (eg Wednesday) thus breaking the Mon-Fri slog and help with fatigue. No?Pidleypoo wrote: ↑15 Apr 2025, 20:40The union should just come out and say that they’re going to throw non-drivers under the bus.
If the only way to reduce fatigue for them is to be indoors on a Saturday ( which will never ever happen ) then why are they suggesting that they could be outdoors on Saturdays also ? Absolutely gormless .
Not a very efficient way of doing things, but surely better than a Mon-Fri walking role doing 2-3 days mail every day?
The union have already identified that it’s a big problem in regards to fatigue for non drivers.
You’d still be walking miles with 2 of you doing parcels on a Saturday.
In all honesty, the only solution is for them to be indoors on a Saturday but that simply won’t happen and the union know that so they should just admit that.
They’re forcing non-drivers out of a job through exhaustion. It really is that simple.
-
Perseus
- Posts: 839
- Joined: 21 Feb 2024, 16:45
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
There will be drastically less walking for anyone working on a Saturday, either indoor or outdoor, unless you get a duty that is full of houses with no vehicle access anywhere near them. For example, I'm usually 12-13 miles a day on a shared van. Same shared van with parcels only - 3-4 miles at a push.Pidleypoo wrote: ↑15 Apr 2025, 20:59Non drivers will be walking further and for longer even under the method you’ve suggested here.Perseus wrote: ↑15 Apr 2025, 20:54If someone is working indoors on a Saturday, or part of a 2 in a van out doing parcels then they would both come with a day off during the week, (eg Wednesday) thus breaking the Mon-Fri slog and help with fatigue. No?Pidleypoo wrote: ↑15 Apr 2025, 20:40The union should just come out and say that they’re going to throw non-drivers under the bus.
If the only way to reduce fatigue for them is to be indoors on a Saturday ( which will never ever happen ) then why are they suggesting that they could be outdoors on Saturdays also ? Absolutely gormless .
Not a very efficient way of doing things, but surely better than a Mon-Fri walking role doing 2-3 days mail every day?
The union have already identified that it’s a big problem in regards to fatigue for non drivers.
You’d still be walking miles with 2 of you doing parcels on a Saturday.
In all honesty, the only solution is for them to be indoors on a Saturday but that simply won’t happen and the union know that so they should just admit that.
They’re forcing non-drivers out of a job through exhaustion. It really is that simple.
-
Pidleypoo
- Posts: 692
- Joined: 17 Dec 2014, 10:05
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 075/25 - Update on USO Pilot Sites
But drastically more during the week.Perseus wrote: ↑15 Apr 2025, 21:12There will be drastically less walking for anyone working on a Saturday, either indoor or outdoor, unless you get a duty that is full of houses with no vehicle access anywhere near them. For example, I'm usually 12-13 miles a day on a shared van. Same shared van with parcels only - 3-4 miles at a push.Pidleypoo wrote: ↑15 Apr 2025, 20:59Non drivers will be walking further and for longer even under the method you’ve suggested here.Perseus wrote: ↑15 Apr 2025, 20:54If someone is working indoors on a Saturday, or part of a 2 in a van out doing parcels then they would both come with a day off during the week, (eg Wednesday) thus breaking the Mon-Fri slog and help with fatigue. No?Pidleypoo wrote: ↑15 Apr 2025, 20:40The union should just come out and say that they’re going to throw non-drivers under the bus.
If the only way to reduce fatigue for them is to be indoors on a Saturday ( which will never ever happen ) then why are they suggesting that they could be outdoors on Saturdays also ? Absolutely gormless .
Not a very efficient way of doing things, but surely better than a Mon-Fri walking role doing 2-3 days mail every day?
The union have already identified that it’s a big problem in regards to fatigue for non drivers.
You’d still be walking miles with 2 of you doing parcels on a Saturday.
In all honesty, the only solution is for them to be indoors on a Saturday but that simply won’t happen and the union know that so they should just admit that.
They’re forcing non-drivers out of a job through exhaustion. It really is that simple.