ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Outdoor Assistant Secretary Tony Bouch addresses the issue of rogue managers at Royal Mail acting outside the agreed terms of reference in relation to the USO pilot schemes.

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
norris9
Posts: 2621
Joined: 27 Feb 2019, 17:32
Gender: Female

Re: Outdoor Assistant Secretary Tony Bouch addresses the issue of rogue managers at Royal Mail acting outside the agreed terms of reference in relation to the USO pilot schemes.

Post by norris9 »

TopperGas wrote:
02 Apr 2025, 22:01

If we all know how RM is run why is the CWU rep now following the Simon Thompson line of rogue managers being to blame?

As others have suggested the CWU seem to have just become part of the management, not a union listening and acting on its members concerns.
How long have the union been saying something along the lines of 'we are pushing Royal Mail to improve the culture within RM offices'....yet nothing changes.

Tony Bouch is doing it wrong. We NEED a flexible 'job and finish' setup to get rid of the toxic culture in delivery. IMO there's no other way to get rid of the toxicity.

You can't have arguments with management about what to deliver or what you haven't delivered if every day you have to complete. On the easier days - no lapsing - you can go home early. At Xmas - you stay out late. Double mail days should be stopped. If you come into double mail you get paid £30 more to clear. If you get double mail more than 5 times a year - it goes up to £70 extra to clear each day.

I will bang on about this forever. WE NEED JOB AND FINISH!
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3190
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: Outdoor Assistant Secretary Tony Bouch addresses the issue of rogue managers at Royal Mail acting outside the agreed terms of reference in relation to the USO pilot schemes.

Post by Acca Dacca »

norris9 wrote:
03 Apr 2025, 07:18
TopperGas wrote:
02 Apr 2025, 22:01

If we all know how RM is run why is the CWU rep now following the Simon Thompson line of rogue managers being to blame?

As others have suggested the CWU seem to have just become part of the management, not a union listening and acting on its members concerns.
How long have the union been saying something along the lines of 'we are pushing Royal Mail to improve the culture within RM offices'....yet nothing changes.

Tony Bouch is doing it wrong. We NEED a flexible 'job and finish' setup to get rid of the toxic culture in delivery. IMO there's no other way to get rid of the toxicity.

You can't have arguments with management about what to deliver or what you haven't delivered if every day you have to complete. On the easier days - no lapsing - you can go home early. At Xmas - you stay out late. Double mail days should be stopped. If you come into double mail you get paid £30 more to clear. If you get double mail more than 5 times a year - it goes up to £70 extra to clear each day.

I will bang on about this forever. WE NEED JOB AND FINISH!
You need to stop banging on about job and finish

Its never going back to the way it was in its old form - any concept of job and finish in the future would be ''commit to deliver''

And if you think things are toxic now with a bullying culture? You havent seen anything like how it would be like if you never had the option to just work your hours

We would literally be bullied into completing the unmanageable workloads every day without recourse

And for a postie that posts a lot on here about struggling with the physical demands of the job - I really dont understand why you would want this
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
HTPostman
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1500
Joined: 01 Sep 2008, 23:53
Gender: Male

Re: Outdoor Assistant Secretary Tony Bouch addresses the issue of rogue managers at Royal Mail acting outside the agreed terms of reference in relation to the USO pilot schemes.

Post by HTPostman »

Job and finish is only manageable if rounds are achievable, which we know they aren’t. And few people with money got there by being nice - why would CEOs agree to an extra £30 for double mail, £70 if it’s happened 5 times a year?! That’s a cost of millions of pounds, for no actual return.

My own crazy proposal (which would be amusing to watch each morning) is everyone to be trained and therefore expected to do each role at a DO; postal worker, union, manager. Actual role would be handed out each morning.

For a start no need for managers (that can be handled from afar/central), you’d simply have team leaders. Postal workers would obviously remain. And everyone would be trained on company/union agreements so no need for day release for union.

Each morning, you’d be given one of the roles. Managers who previously spent all morning playing candy crush and eating donuts can now expect to strap on a postbag and crack on with a 13 mile delivery. Walsh and co can join them.
The day is gonna come when we’re all gonna have to testify.

526
Woody Guthrie
Posts: 5166
Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: Outdoor Assistant Secretary Tony Bouch addresses the issue of rogue managers at Royal Mail acting outside the agreed terms of reference in relation to the USO pilot schemes.

Post by Woody Guthrie »

There is actually some traction in returning to job and finish amongst management but the union wouldn't be keen.

There is something in the fact that encouraging performance in a low paid job requires some kind of incentive otherwise everyone simply does the bare minimum. When it's difficult even to put any kind of measure on what that bare minimum is without walking through a minefield of individual ability, age and disability discrimination that minimum can start to creep backwards.

What has become obvious with the new terms and conditions and how close we're getting to minimum wage is that the big stick attitude no longer works, people just keep leaving especially amongst the new starts.

Financial incentives are difficult to manage fairly and would have to first ensure workload was fair and balanced and any incentive was equally achievable in any function in any area of the country and I don't hold out much hope for that.
Only dead fish follow the current
Alfietherat
Posts: 75
Joined: 08 Feb 2011, 17:08
Gender: Male

Re: Outdoor Assistant Secretary Tony Bouch addresses the issue of rogue managers at Royal Mail acting outside the agreed terms of reference in relation to the USO pilot schemes.

Post by Alfietherat »

tramssirhc wrote:
02 Apr 2025, 16:02
Mickeybrowneyes wrote:
02 Apr 2025, 15:44
tramssirhc wrote:
02 Apr 2025, 15:33
Mickeybrowneyes wrote:
02 Apr 2025, 08:45
tramssirhc wrote:
02 Apr 2025, 06:45
Mickeybrowneyes wrote:
02 Apr 2025, 06:23
pinstripe wrote:
02 Apr 2025, 00:11
tramssirhc wrote:
01 Apr 2025, 20:14
chickenwittle wrote:
01 Apr 2025, 19:31
The usual suspects straight on to put the boot into the CWU , boring.
In fairness the CWU deserve it. It's an awful organisation.
Yeah, let’s all pull our subs and chuck the union. We don’t need a union. RM are are great employer, the CWU are holding us back. Without them we could be living a life of luxury with, dare I dream, commit to deliver, unpaid breaks, no representation, imposed pay rises, I could go on, but alas, the CWU are the ones preventing this utopia from happening
Exactly.
Never understood the constant bashing of an organisation thats sole existence is to make our working life better.
You can have opinions on their direction of travel of whether they are dealing with certain issues well enough but the way some on here speak about them you would think they were the enemy within.
Bizarre. If you hate them that much leave the union and be done with it.
It's classic trait of CWU loyalists to conflate critism with treachery. Only those not on the bag could consider the CWU a useful entity at the moment.
Criticism about elements of their effectiveness is different to just attacking the whole organisation at any opportunity.
Calling them an awful organisation suggest they are bad to the core.
If you are still in the union them why?
Why would you pay for something that you despise so much.
It is bad to the core. No representative should be sitting back and letting this happen. No one is saying no. The members, the reps, the branches. That's how bad the rot is.
Saying it's rotten to the core is strong.
Allot of reps are trying their best to serve the interest of it's members.
Its hard to get a grip of all these offices at once if they are being instructed to manage a certain way.
I agree it probably is a decision pushed from senior management to local managers.
Local managers don't need the grief of managing on the shop floor, but will do as they are instructed.
If you were a rep would you simply go along with whatever was going on? I wouldn't. I fully understand the reps are poorly trained and do not get trained to be industrially and politically independent. But ignorance is not an excuse. The workplace reps need to say enough is enough and take the area and div reps on. I understand its not easy as the branch will close ranks but I'd sooner fight them than be on my knees.
And that’s why so many local reps resign. It really is a thankless role.
Perseus
Posts: 959
Joined: 21 Feb 2024, 16:45
Gender: Male

Re: Outdoor Assistant Secretary Tony Bouch addresses the issue of rogue managers at Royal Mail acting outside the agreed terms of reference in relation to the USO pilot schemes.

Post by Perseus »

I think people are rightly getting annoyed/past the point of caring to be constantly told that something that they know about is happening, is getting raised higher/fixed/stopped only to go back to square one.
It's draining.
ted_e_bear
Posts: 3933
Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
Gender: Male

Re: Outdoor Assistant Secretary Tony Bouch addresses the issue of rogue managers at Royal Mail acting outside the agreed terms of reference in relation to the USO pilot schemes.

Post by ted_e_bear »

Perseus wrote:
03 Apr 2025, 16:50
I think people are rightly getting annoyed/past the point of caring to be constantly told that something that they know about is happening, is getting raised higher/fixed/stopped only to go back to square one.
It's draining.
Tell me about it, quite a few at our place hoping the only positive about the upcoming changes is a full office rehash to get the duties more equal even if it is equally s**t but oh no our manager already saying some will just stay on their piss easy singletons no need for a repick or anything
tramssirhc
Posts: 1640
Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
Gender: Male

Re: Outdoor Assistant Secretary Tony Bouch addresses the issue of rogue managers at Royal Mail acting outside the agreed terms of reference in relation to the USO pilot schemes.

Post by tramssirhc »

ted_e_bear wrote:
04 Apr 2025, 06:29
Perseus wrote:
03 Apr 2025, 16:50
I think people are rightly getting annoyed/past the point of caring to be constantly told that something that they know about is happening, is getting raised higher/fixed/stopped only to go back to square one.
It's draining.
Tell me about it, quite a few at our place hoping the only positive about the upcoming changes is a full office rehash to get the duties more equal even if it is equally s**t but oh no our manager already saying some will just stay on their piss easy singletons no need for a repick or anything
Singleton duties remain unaffected. Going out everyday. Whilst the CDV pairings get hammered. Only with the CWU.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
Woody Guthrie
Posts: 5166
Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: Outdoor Assistant Secretary Tony Bouch addresses the issue of rogue managers at Royal Mail acting outside the agreed terms of reference in relation to the USO pilot schemes.

Post by Woody Guthrie »

ted_e_bear wrote:
04 Apr 2025, 06:29

Tell me about it, quite a few at our place hoping the only positive about the upcoming changes is a full office rehash to get the duties more equal even if it is equally s**t but oh no our manager already saying some will just stay on their piss easy singletons no need for a repick or anything
At the moment the position would be that rurals and firms would be out of scope for the first 12 months or until such time as a full office revision is implemented however like everything else that will be subject to the outputs of the trial sites.

This will create a dilemma for those duties though because as they will not see any increase in workload they will not as it stands between able to move onto the proposed new attendance patterns unless there was a proportional increase in their delivery span. It will be interesting to see how that plays out.
Only dead fish follow the current
Londonsburning
Posts: 1018
Joined: 09 Oct 2024, 18:14
Gender: Male

Re: Outdoor Assistant Secretary Tony Bouch addresses the issue of rogue managers at Royal Mail acting outside the agreed terms of reference in relation to the USO pilot schemes.

Post by Londonsburning »

ted_e_bear wrote:
04 Apr 2025, 06:29
Perseus wrote:
03 Apr 2025, 16:50
I think people are rightly getting annoyed/past the point of caring to be constantly told that something that they know about is happening, is getting raised higher/fixed/stopped only to go back to square one.
It's draining.
Tell me about it, quite a few at our place hoping the only positive about the upcoming changes is a full office rehash to get the duties more equal even if it is equally s**t but oh no our manager already saying some will just stay on their piss easy singletons no need for a repick or anything
It's utterly embarrassing innit. Blatant favouritism is rife in this shitty job.
Mr Rush
Posts: 3069
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
Gender: Male

Re: Outdoor Assistant Secretary Tony Bouch addresses the issue of rogue managers at Royal Mail acting outside the agreed terms of reference in relation to the USO pilot schemes.

Post by Mr Rush »

Londonsburning wrote:
02 Apr 2025, 17:36
It was RM that coined the rogue manager spiel originally years ago. They know what they're doing and now the CWU are toeing the line like the good little lapdogs they have become unfortunately.
'Rogue Managers' was the company's excuse during the parliamentary enquiry for the instances of proof arising of the prioritisation of Tracked. I seem to recall the union, along with everyone else, scoffed at that. But they're real now!
The machine stops.
Londonsburning
Posts: 1018
Joined: 09 Oct 2024, 18:14
Gender: Male

Re: Outdoor Assistant Secretary Tony Bouch addresses the issue of rogue managers at Royal Mail acting outside the agreed terms of reference in relation to the USO pilot schemes.

Post by Londonsburning »

Mr Rush wrote:
04 Apr 2025, 20:33
Londonsburning wrote:
02 Apr 2025, 17:36
It was RM that coined the rogue manager spiel originally years ago. They know what they're doing and now the CWU are toeing the line like the good little lapdogs they have become unfortunately.
'Rogue Managers' was the company's excuse during the parliamentary enquiry for the instances of proof arising of the prioritisation of Tracked. I seem to recall the union, along with everyone else, scoffed at that. But they're real now!
They have always been real Mr Rush, the word rogue is misleading as I would estimate about 90% of managers are and always have been. It's been a requirement for the job for as long as I can remember.
Pidleypoo
Posts: 697
Joined: 17 Dec 2014, 10:05
Gender: Male

Re: Outdoor Assistant Secretary Tony Bouch addresses the issue of rogue managers at Royal Mail acting outside the agreed terms of reference in relation to the USO pilot schemes.

Post by Pidleypoo »

ted_e_bear wrote:
04 Apr 2025, 06:29
Perseus wrote:
03 Apr 2025, 16:50
I think people are rightly getting annoyed/past the point of caring to be constantly told that something that they know about is happening, is getting raised higher/fixed/stopped only to go back to square one.
It's draining.
Tell me about it, quite a few at our place hoping the only positive about the upcoming changes is a full office rehash to get the duties more equal even if it is equally s**t but oh no our manager already saying some will just stay on their piss easy singletons no need for a repick or anything
I thought Martin Walsh said on his YouTube video from a couple of days ago that when this comes in , every office will have to have a repick ?
Mickeybrowneyes
Posts: 410
Joined: 12 Sep 2021, 06:18
Gender: Male

Re: Outdoor Assistant Secretary Tony Bouch addresses the issue of rogue managers at Royal Mail acting outside the agreed terms of reference in relation to the USO pilot schemes.

Post by Mickeybrowneyes »

Pidleypoo wrote:
05 Apr 2025, 06:46
ted_e_bear wrote:
04 Apr 2025, 06:29
Perseus wrote:
03 Apr 2025, 16:50
I think people are rightly getting annoyed/past the point of caring to be constantly told that something that they know about is happening, is getting raised higher/fixed/stopped only to go back to square one.
It's draining.
Tell me about it, quite a few at our place hoping the only positive about the upcoming changes is a full office rehash to get the duties more equal even if it is equally s**t but oh no our manager already saying some will just stay on their piss easy singletons no need for a repick or anything
I thought Martin Walsh said on his YouTube video from a couple of days ago that when this comes in , every office will have to have a repick ?
I think you are going to have to.
How is it going to work otherwise. Passengers will be moved off their walk every other day.
Singletons different but if the letters barring 1st class aren't going out daily will they have workload to justify a day's work. I doubt it.
Woody Guthrie
Posts: 5166
Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: Outdoor Assistant Secretary Tony Bouch addresses the issue of rogue managers at Royal Mail acting outside the agreed terms of reference in relation to the USO pilot schemes.

Post by Woody Guthrie »

Pidleypoo wrote:
05 Apr 2025, 06:46
ted_e_bear wrote:
04 Apr 2025, 06:29
Perseus wrote:
03 Apr 2025, 16:50
I think people are rightly getting annoyed/past the point of caring to be constantly told that something that they know about is happening, is getting raised higher/fixed/stopped only to go back to square one.
It's draining.
Tell me about it, quite a few at our place hoping the only positive about the upcoming changes is a full office rehash to get the duties more equal even if it is equally s**t but oh no our manager already saying some will just stay on their piss easy singletons no need for a repick or anything
I thought Martin Walsh said on his YouTube video from a couple of days ago that when this comes in , every office will have to have a repick ?
Duties unaffected by major change would not necessarily be included in any repick.
Only dead fish follow the current