http://www.mad.co.uk/Main/News/Articlex ... imity.html
Royal Mail has extended its relationship with Abbott Mead Vickers BBDO and Proximity London to handle the company’s above and below-the-line accounts respectively for another four years.
The new contracts follow a statutory review of the accounts. AMV BBDO fought off competition from Rainey Kelly Campbell Roalfe/Y&R and Leagas Delaney, while Proximity successfully pitched against EHS Brann, Tequila and Rapier.
Royal Mail has also appointed Wolff Olins, the agency behind the London 2012 Olympic imagery, to handle its brand development.
Banner Ad
Tom Hings, director of brand marketing at Royal Mail, said: "We are delighted to have finalised our above and below the line agency roster review after a thorough and competitive process over the past few months.
"The agencies that pitched for the work demonstrated a good understanding of our needs and their work was of an extremely high standard which made our decision particularly difficult.
“However, after careful consideration, we have recruited a team of agencies that we feel will best support the integrated marketing needs of Royal Mail as it continues to meet the challenges of a fully competitive postal market."
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Royal Mail reappoints AMV and Proximity (ACCOUNTANTS)
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72596
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Royal Mail reappoints AMV and Proximity (ACCOUNTANTS)
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
Stormproof
- Posts: 6116
- Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 21:03
- Gender: Female
and what a success that wasRoyal Mail has also appointed Wolff Olins, the agency behind the London 2012 Olympic imagery, to handle its brand development.
So keep on moving, moving, moving your feet
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets
Illegitimi non carborundum
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets
Illegitimi non carborundum
-
DGP1
- Posts: 15551
- Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
- Gender: Male
- Location: Terminus
I've done a bit of accountancy but I've never heard of below the line accounts, as far as I'm aware there are only accounts otherwise the tax man gets a bit upset and fines you for false accounting.above and below-the-line accounts
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72596
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
http://www.businessdictionary.com/defin ... -line.htmldisgruntledpostie1 wrote:I've done a bit of accountancy but I've never heard of below the line accounts, as far as I'm aware there are only accounts otherwise the tax man gets a bit upset and fines you for false accounting.above and below-the-line accounts
Below the line
Definition 1
Accounting: Items in an account which are excluded from the account total, such as appropriations and extraordinary items that have no effect on the profit or loss in the current accounting period.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
jemima
- Posts: 272
- Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 10:52
- Location: Cantre'r Gwaelod
-
BELIAL
- Posts: 6758
- Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
- Gender: Female
- Location: Nowhere
Appropriation is a very useful tool if you want to paint a particular picture. As last years auditors stated ,appropriation was carried out on an arbitrary basis,ie the industry is segmented and costs and revenues are decided at will,so black could be red and vice versa , whatever suits your ultimate purpose. Whats real? not RM figures according to their independent auditors!
-
jemima
- Posts: 272
- Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 10:52
- Location: Cantre'r Gwaelod
-
F0zziebear
- MYSTERY MAN
- Posts: 637
- Joined: 31 Jan 2007, 23:45
re: Thsi refers to marketing agencies and not accountancy
Time for a little bit of RM Marketing:
1. Royal Mail had a habit of employing the largest agencies to do the marketing for a monopoly. Madness I know. We also had a habit of going into these agencies telling them what are budget was and surprise surprise the advertising they did for us used up the whole budget. This is partly why you got stupid CGI effects on TV adverts as a way to justify the huge marketing budget.
In Royal Mail unless you use your budget there is a big chance it will get taken away. A classic example of inefficient use of public money that happens across the entire public sector.
2. There are numerous over-paid marketing middle-management who manage these accounts, and have the wool pulled over their eyes. I thought this had stopped but obviously not.
3. The same large agencies who were doing all the ATL and BTL line have won the new contracts. Don't ask me how considering the Chief Exec. is a former Marketing whizz kid at Saatchi & Saatchi you'd think this was a part of the company that knew what it was doing. It also has a former European Marketing Director for Orange called Alex batchelor running the show for the last 2 1/2 yrs.
I am disappointed to see what has happened.
However, one should point that a review of this area saw that The Post Office Ltd was actually get a much better deal from these agencies than Royal Mail. Yes we have two marketind departments one for PO and one for RM Letters. I just hope the new contracts have been written better, and managed better. However, with a change in personnel to manage these I have my doubts.
Hope this provides some light on the matter
p.s. If RM is delivering 99% of Mail then you may ask why there is a need to psend so much on marketing in general? The DSA companies rely on RM to deliver their accounts, so no RM no Mail full-stop. Might be about time that TNT, DHL, Uk Mail etc... spent more on their advertising won more contracts and then paid RM more to deliver their mail. Wonder what people think about that?
F0zz in the trenches
1. Royal Mail had a habit of employing the largest agencies to do the marketing for a monopoly. Madness I know. We also had a habit of going into these agencies telling them what are budget was and surprise surprise the advertising they did for us used up the whole budget. This is partly why you got stupid CGI effects on TV adverts as a way to justify the huge marketing budget.
In Royal Mail unless you use your budget there is a big chance it will get taken away. A classic example of inefficient use of public money that happens across the entire public sector.
2. There are numerous over-paid marketing middle-management who manage these accounts, and have the wool pulled over their eyes. I thought this had stopped but obviously not.
3. The same large agencies who were doing all the ATL and BTL line have won the new contracts. Don't ask me how considering the Chief Exec. is a former Marketing whizz kid at Saatchi & Saatchi you'd think this was a part of the company that knew what it was doing. It also has a former European Marketing Director for Orange called Alex batchelor running the show for the last 2 1/2 yrs.
I am disappointed to see what has happened.
However, one should point that a review of this area saw that The Post Office Ltd was actually get a much better deal from these agencies than Royal Mail. Yes we have two marketind departments one for PO and one for RM Letters. I just hope the new contracts have been written better, and managed better. However, with a change in personnel to manage these I have my doubts.
Hope this provides some light on the matter
p.s. If RM is delivering 99% of Mail then you may ask why there is a need to psend so much on marketing in general? The DSA companies rely on RM to deliver their accounts, so no RM no Mail full-stop. Might be about time that TNT, DHL, Uk Mail etc... spent more on their advertising won more contracts and then paid RM more to deliver their mail. Wonder what people think about that?
F0zz in the trenches
-
jemima
- Posts: 272
- Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 10:52
- Location: Cantre'r Gwaelod
Re: re: Thsi refers to marketing agencies and not accountanc
RM collecting and delivering systems aren't separate, they normally use the same offices/vans/lorries/posties etc in synergy, which makes the system as a whole very cost-efficient. So a reduction in RM mail-gathering would mean increasing DSA delivery costs by quite a lot to make DSA cost-effective. Postcomm probably wouldn't like that.F0zziebear wrote:
p.s. If RM is delivering 99% of Mail then you may ask why there is a need to psend so much on marketing in general? The DSA companies rely on RM to deliver their accounts, so no RM no Mail full-stop. Might be about time that TNT, DHL, Uk Mail etc... spent more on their advertising won more contracts and then paid RM more to deliver their mail. Wonder what people think about that?
Re marketing expenses - I haven't seen any details anywhere about £s returned in business for £s spent. Is any information available?