Am I right that the principles within the Conduct Code still require a 1st day letter, a 48 hour review and a weekly letter when Precautionary suspended?
That a request or invite to a Formal Fact Finding meeting requires a 48 hour notice period in writing?
And when a case is passed up from a Fact Finding meeting to a 2nd Line manager, it requires a letter stating the case is being passed up as the decision may be outside the authority of the initial investigating manager?
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Conduct Code
-
ninja
- Posts: 193
- Joined: 08 Sep 2010, 20:16
- Gender: Male
Re: Conduct Code
Mostly correct but 2 days could be 5 days for serious cases.
Refer to page 27 managers role to actively look for mitigation.
Passing case up requires more then outside my level as you should understand what investigation had taken place for them to reach passing up
Key point corrective process and not punitive.
Refer to keeping records process as managers rarely document
Refer to page 27 managers role to actively look for mitigation.
Passing case up requires more then outside my level as you should understand what investigation had taken place for them to reach passing up
Key point corrective process and not punitive.
Refer to keeping records process as managers rarely document
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.