D 2 D what would you prefer?

dropbag_clone · Post by **dropbag_clone** » 19 Mar 2008, 19:15

D2D plans, does any of these ideas grab you?

[/img]

DGP1 · Post by **DGP1** » 19 Mar 2008, 19:27

Just get rid of the f***ers

Morethan16KG · Post by **Morethan16KG** » 19 Mar 2008, 19:30

Shove em where the sun don't shine!!!!

Post by **dvbuk55** » 19 Mar 2008, 19:33

dropbag_clone wrote:D2D plans, does any of these ideas grab you?

Are these serious proposals?

Post by **TrueBlueTerrier** » 19 Mar 2008, 19:34

not happy with the Â£12 and Â£7 deals - I have over 600 drop points and can take home anywhere from Â£20 to Â£30 on an average week. Thats a pay cut of Â£8 to Â£23 per week.

I do like the idea of a dedicated delivery duty for them, that could be set up on a casual basis and would be easier for RM to track.

The 5 x 1.67 would be the lowest I would go to and they would have to absorb it into duty time, ie increase prep time.

k979aaa · Post by **k979aaa** » 19 Mar 2008, 19:52

dropbag_clone wrote:D2D plans, does any of these ideas grab you?

[/img]

I may not be the first to say this but billy hayes and dave ward may well recommenend this as a good deal!.

IN GOD'S NAME WHY DID WE CONCEDE OUR POSITION IN OCTOBER FOR EVERYTHING COULD HAVE BEEN DECIDED THEN OR SOON AFTER!. FOR NOW ROYALMAIL SEE US AS PICK AND MIX PICK HERE AND THEIR AND MIX HERE AND THEIR!. :lfo & :cfo

madelin4 · Post by **madelin4** » 19 Mar 2008, 20:19

5 items every week i could just not manage that two well at all never mind the payments!!!!!!!!!!!

RobRoyThePostie · Post by **RobRoyThePostie** » 19 Mar 2008, 20:47

I can see the union going for options 1 or 2. Possibly option 2, as with the CWU campaign to increase basic pay, RM may dangle this carrot in front of the union as an acceptable choice. The last time I spoke to my boss about D2D he reckoned it would be incorporated into basic, as RM want to "simplify" pay. The problem is as TrueBlueTerrier says, that with Option 1 and 2, a lot of posties will be taking a pay cut if this were the case.

BELIAL · Post by **BELIAL** » 19 Mar 2008, 20:49

Somebody's taking the piss

councillor · Post by **councillor** » 19 Mar 2008, 21:12

I was 2 hours over today without D2D's........I CAN'T FEKKKKKKIN "ABSORB" ANY MORE.

vigilante · Post by **vigilante** » 19 Mar 2008, 21:25

Hey Royal Mail!!

Absorb this f*****r!!

DGP1 · Post by **DGP1** » 19 Mar 2008, 21:28

councillor wrote:I was 2 hours over today without D2D's........I CAN'T FEKKKKKKIN "ABSORB" ANY MORE.

That would be the great reduction in volume then. No D2D's anymore, let our competitors deliver them

Darren Bent · Post by **Darren Bent** » 19 Mar 2008, 22:17

I hated them. I think there should be an option for 10p for every 5 doors to doors bundle already prepared before delivering them. So we can just use what we want and none of preparation. So this way we get more money, reduced workload on preparation and Royal D2D get more money.

madelin4 · Post by **madelin4** » 19 Mar 2008, 22:21

I dont mind them but i dont want 5!!! max 3 and no more!!!!!!!!!!!!! god knows what we will suffer in the not 2 distant future if we have to cart around 5 door 2 doors!!!! its not worth the wear and tear on our bodies, we only will ever have 1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :cfo

Post by **POSTMAN** » 19 Mar 2008, 22:29

Heard from a good source that RM are dropping plans for more D2D'S as they can't get enough contracts to up it all.

ROYALMAILCHAT

D 2 D what would you prefer?

D 2 D what would you prefer?

Re: D 2 D what would you prefer?

Re: D 2 D what would you prefer?

absorb d2d