TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
I think it was a case of RM playing the CWU for a chump. While the horse bolted in the background, the union was trying to decide if it was a Unicorn or a thoroughbred, in fact it turned out to be a donkey.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
ALL IS NOT LOST
-
Carnoustie
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 793
- Joined: 31 Jan 2007, 22:00
-
BELIAL
- Posts: 6758
- Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
- Gender: Female
- Location: Nowhere
-
pinstripe
- Posts: 2462
- Joined: 25 May 2007, 16:42
- Gender: Male
- Location: 2 left turns from reality
-
Night Tonic
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: 23 Oct 2007, 21:35
You're quite right pinstripe although it might be a bit simplistic to narrow it down to fighters and those who give up. Generally most of us have mixed feelings. I'm a stong believer in not being beaten by bigger people but I watched the entire parliament debate on PO closures today and one thing both Hutton and McFadden made clear was that biggest reason for shutting PO's was affordability and what the tax payer would put up with. Pan that out on paying pensions and its pretty obvious that NO money will be coming from government. This country has I think,the biggest debt in Europe.
Fight yes, but with what in mind? The best we're likely to get out of this is some climb-down on elements of RM's proposal but if there is, there won't be much. Every single public pension plan (and lots of private ones) is struggling with the fact that people are living longer and pension providers paying out more. Even if there wasn't a deficit (and some doubt that), we'd still have to have revised pension plans. That doesn't mean I'd roll over, I won't, but best we'll get is small change - particularly when the unions left the decision on pensions so ambiguous.
Fight yes, but with what in mind? The best we're likely to get out of this is some climb-down on elements of RM's proposal but if there is, there won't be much. Every single public pension plan (and lots of private ones) is struggling with the fact that people are living longer and pension providers paying out more. Even if there wasn't a deficit (and some doubt that), we'd still have to have revised pension plans. That doesn't mean I'd roll over, I won't, but best we'll get is small change - particularly when the unions left the decision on pensions so ambiguous.