ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

RMCtv : Message from Martin Seidenberg and Grant McPherson: Delivering a great Christmas, including one-off quality of service incentive scheme

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
Valentina@1
Posts: 840
Joined: 13 Apr 2023, 16:48
Gender: Male

Re: RMCtv : Message from Martin Seidenberg and Grant McPherson: Delivering a great Christmas, including one-off quality of service incentive scheme

Post by Valentina@1 »

scotchy1962 wrote:
23 Oct 2023, 18:34
Everyone and i mean everyone is entitled to their opinion.
But everyone and i mean everyone is entitled to criticise that opinion.
If you put it out their and expect nobody to question it or criticise it perhaps you shouldn't put it out there in the first place.
I would like to think we are all thick-skinned enough to cope with it and not resort to "i am telling on you" but really i don't care.
If some self righteous person thinks people are stalking/harassing them, when in reality they are just being critical, they need to grow up.
We are all big boys/girls/thems? and should be able to take criticism on the chin.
And remember if you type it, own it, and be prepared for the onslaught.
👏 👏👏👏 well said
thefox
Posts: 1171
Joined: 24 Aug 2010, 20:09
Gender: Male

Re: RMCtv : Message from Martin Seidenberg and Grant McPherson: Delivering a great Christmas, including one-off quality of service incentive scheme

Post by thefox »

LouBarlow wrote:
23 Oct 2023, 17:34
thefox wrote:
23 Oct 2023, 15:48
LouBarlow wrote:
23 Oct 2023, 14:52
hans solo wrote:
23 Oct 2023, 11:45
Lou is prob one of them
One of what? If Oh we are back to that old chestnut. I’m not a miserable, moaning poster on here, so must be a manager? Ok. I suggest you read the rules of the forums in regard this. I wouldn’t want to see anyone else banned.
You were practically saying that cribmad guy was an alcoholic whats the forum rules about that kind of behaviour 🤔
Another one of my sycophants following me around. Interesting that it is always the same people. CRIBMAD was unhinged and obviously had problems. I hope he found help and is OK.

I’m just going to start reporting these posts now, as it isn’t fair on other users here that that same problem posters drag threads off topic with this personal nonsense.

You aren’t going to hound me off these forums. Get over yourself.
Your going to start reporting these posts🤣what exactly is there to report🤪
LouBarlow
Posts: 4709
Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56

Re: RMCtv : Message from Martin Seidenberg and Grant McPherson: Delivering a great Christmas, including one-off quality of service incentive scheme

Post by LouBarlow »

scotchy1962 wrote:
23 Oct 2023, 18:34
Everyone and i mean everyone is entitled to their opinion.
But everyone and i mean everyone is entitled to criticise that opinion.
If you put it out their and expect nobody to question it or criticise it perhaps you shouldn't put it out there in the first place.
I would like to think we are all thick-skinned enough to cope with it and not resort to "i am telling on you" but really i don't care.
If some self righteous person thinks people are stalking/harassing them, when in reality they are just being critical, they need to grow up.
We are all big boys/girls/thems? and should be able to take criticism on the chin.
And remember if you type it, own it, and be prepared for the onslaught.
Debate is fine scotchy. Following people round forums just to dish out insults is another thing. I get it, people post on here late at night, after they are perhaps a little ‘relaxed’ and might get carried away. I just don’t appreciate being followed around these forums by people who have beef with me in other threads, because they are still *still* bitter that they lost the vote on the agreement.

They drag these threads off topic by doing so and ruin the place for everyone. Attack the opinion, not the poster. That or just ignore.
TopperGas
Posts: 3458
Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
Gender: Male

Re: RMCtv : Message from Martin Seidenberg and Grant McPherson: Delivering a great Christmas, including one-off quality of service incentive scheme

Post by TopperGas »

LouBarlow wrote:
23 Oct 2023, 19:41
scotchy1962 wrote:
23 Oct 2023, 18:34
Everyone and i mean everyone is entitled to their opinion.
But everyone and i mean everyone is entitled to criticise that opinion.
If you put it out their and expect nobody to question it or criticise it perhaps you shouldn't put it out there in the first place.
I would like to think we are all thick-skinned enough to cope with it and not resort to "i am telling on you" but really i don't care.
If some self righteous person thinks people are stalking/harassing them, when in reality they are just being critical, they need to grow up.
We are all big boys/girls/thems? and should be able to take criticism on the chin.
And remember if you type it, own it, and be prepared for the onslaught.
Debate is fine scotchy. Following people round forums just to dish out insults is another thing. I get it, people post on here late at night, after they are perhaps a little ‘relaxed’ and might get carried away. I just don’t appreciate being followed around these forums by people who have beef with me in other threads, because they are still *still* bitter that they lost the vote on the agreement.

They drag these threads off topic by doing so and ruin the place for everyone. Attack the opinion, not the poster. That or just ignore.
I doubt anybody follows you around they just see your posts on the most recent threads, as I regularly do, given you seem to post on most recent threads I'd imagine it would be hard to not see your recent posts TBH.
LouBarlow
Posts: 4709
Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56

Re: RMCtv : Message from Martin Seidenberg and Grant McPherson: Delivering a great Christmas, including one-off quality of service incentive scheme

Post by LouBarlow »

TopperGas wrote:
23 Oct 2023, 19:59
LouBarlow wrote:
23 Oct 2023, 19:41
scotchy1962 wrote:
23 Oct 2023, 18:34
Everyone and i mean everyone is entitled to their opinion.
But everyone and i mean everyone is entitled to criticise that opinion.
If you put it out their and expect nobody to question it or criticise it perhaps you shouldn't put it out there in the first place.
I would like to think we are all thick-skinned enough to cope with it and not resort to "i am telling on you" but really i don't care.
If some self righteous person thinks people are stalking/harassing them, when in reality they are just being critical, they need to grow up.
We are all big boys/girls/thems? and should be able to take criticism on the chin.
And remember if you type it, own it, and be prepared for the onslaught.
Debate is fine scotchy. Following people round forums just to dish out insults is another thing. I get it, people post on here late at night, after they are perhaps a little ‘relaxed’ and might get carried away. I just don’t appreciate being followed around these forums by people who have beef with me in other threads, because they are still *still* bitter that they lost the vote on the agreement.

They drag these threads off topic by doing so and ruin the place for everyone. Attack the opinion, not the poster. That or just ignore.
I doubt anybody follows you around they just see your posts on the most recent threads, as I regularly do, given you seem to post on most recent threads I'd imagine it would be hard to not see your recent posts TBH.
Oh come on. You always get the same three people pop up after every time I post something. You can guarantee it. If I were so inclined I’d be flattered but it’s getting a bit creepy to be honest.
postslippete
Posts: 4188
Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
Gender: Male

Re: RMCtv : Message from Martin Seidenberg and Grant McPherson: Delivering a great Christmas, including one-off quality of service incentive scheme

Post by postslippete »

I'm all for differences in opinions. If I were in charge of RM I would do away with all bonuses, except the one we all get at Xmas.

You already said Lou that if you worry what bonuses managers get then you drive yourself crazy, well, I remember a manager being annoyed because they didn't get the bonuses that other managers got. He wouldn't speculate what this amount actually was though.

That's often the problem with the bonus culture as it often creates issues and tensions that it doesn't need. Like I said before, if you want more money, you work more overtime.

For me personally, the best bonus the company could give me isn't more money, it's more time off and I'll only get that if they actually employed more staff instead of expecting staff to not go sick, work 6 days a week and come in early and finish work late!!
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.
mrcurve
Posts: 112
Joined: 23 Nov 2011, 19:27
Gender: Male

Re: RMCtv : Message from Martin Seidenberg and Grant McPherson: Delivering a great Christmas, including one-off quality of service incentive scheme

Post by mrcurve »

What Christmas bonus, pretty sure the 2 payments have never been a bonus just fixed payments, its been decades since we had a bonus scheme.
LouBarlow
Posts: 4709
Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56

Re: RMCtv : Message from Martin Seidenberg and Grant McPherson: Delivering a great Christmas, including one-off quality of service incentive scheme

Post by LouBarlow »

postslippete wrote:
23 Oct 2023, 21:30

You already said Lou that if you worry what bonuses managers get then you drive yourself crazy, well, I remember a manager being annoyed because they didn't get the bonuses that other managers got. He wouldn't speculate what this amount actually was though.
Yeah I would be peeved if there was a performance related bonus that varies inside the same office too. In our case I’m not even sure how such a thing could be measured. Would it incentivise people to come in early unpaid to get it. It is definitely a slippery slope.
Valentina@1
Posts: 840
Joined: 13 Apr 2023, 16:48
Gender: Male

Re: RMCtv : Message from Martin Seidenberg and Grant McPherson: Delivering a great Christmas, including one-off quality of service incentive scheme

Post by Valentina@1 »

If people accept this l £500 bonus,run around like crazy,start before time, then rest assured “commit to deliver” will be phased in,probably with sone kind of”CWU” agreed bonus attached to it,to make us feel like it’s a good deal,when clearly will will be like donkeys🤯🤯
Valentina@1
Posts: 840
Joined: 13 Apr 2023, 16:48
Gender: Male

Re: RMCtv : Message from Martin Seidenberg and Grant McPherson: Delivering a great Christmas, including one-off quality of service incentive scheme

Post by Valentina@1 »

In March my office will become around an 8am start,this coupled with commit to deliver all year round,I’ll still be delivering at 5-6pm😡😡😡😡😡
Philbag70
Posts: 114
Joined: 09 Aug 2019, 13:35
Gender: Male

Re: RMCtv : Message from Martin Seidenberg and Grant McPherson: Delivering a great Christmas, including one-off quality of service incentive scheme

Post by Philbag70 »

Commit to deliver is utter bullspit. It's yet another stick to beat us with. I dread to think about the amount of employees that'll be forced to leave due to other life commitments...but I suspect that's their plan.
luddite
Posts: 451
Joined: 06 May 2008, 20:24

Re: RMCtv : Message from Martin Seidenberg and Grant McPherson: Delivering a great Christmas, including one-off quality of service incentive scheme

Post by luddite »

If people didn't work through their holidays at our depot the place would fall apart. I'd love £500 at Xmas because we've had an overtime ban for years here.
2yearpostie
Posts: 1839
Joined: 03 Mar 2020, 15:36
Gender: Male

Re: RMCtv : Message from Martin Seidenberg and Grant McPherson: Delivering a great Christmas, including one-off quality of service incentive scheme

Post by 2yearpostie »

Plan on doing the same work days off NOV/DEC normal hours what gets done, gets done, What doesnt goes the next day, If I get a bonus or not im not overly bothered.
thefox
Posts: 1171
Joined: 24 Aug 2010, 20:09
Gender: Male

Re: RMCtv : Message from Martin Seidenberg and Grant McPherson: Delivering a great Christmas, including one-off quality of service incentive scheme

Post by thefox »

TopperGas wrote:
23 Oct 2023, 19:59
LouBarlow wrote:
23 Oct 2023, 19:41
scotchy1962 wrote:
23 Oct 2023, 18:34
Everyone and i mean everyone is entitled to their opinion.
But everyone and i mean everyone is entitled to criticise that opinion.
If you put it out their and expect nobody to question it or criticise it perhaps you shouldn't put it out there in the first place.
I would like to think we are all thick-skinned enough to cope with it and not resort to "i am telling on you" but really i don't care.
If some self righteous person thinks people are stalking/harassing them, when in reality they are just being critical, they need to grow up.
We are all big boys/girls/thems? and should be able to take criticism on the chin.
And remember if you type it, own it, and be prepared for the onslaught.
Debate is fine scotchy. Following people round forums just to dish out insults is another thing. I get it, people post on here late at night, after they are perhaps a little ‘relaxed’ and might get carried away. I just don’t appreciate being followed around these forums by people who have beef with me in other threads, because they are still *still* bitter that they lost the vote on the agreement.

They drag these threads off topic by doing so and ruin the place for everyone. Attack the opinion, not the poster. That or just ignore.
I doubt anybody follows you around they just see your posts on the most recent threads, as I regularly do, given you seem to post on most recent threads I'd imagine it would be hard to not see your recent posts TBH.
Correct,nobody is following him about🤣🤣🤣
scotchy1962
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 865
Joined: 25 Mar 2020, 16:55
Gender: Male

Re: RMCtv : Message from Martin Seidenberg and Grant McPherson: Delivering a great Christmas, including one-off quality of service incentive scheme

Post by scotchy1962 »

TopperGas wrote:
23 Oct 2023, 19:59
LouBarlow wrote:
23 Oct 2023, 19:41
scotchy1962 wrote:
23 Oct 2023, 18:34
Everyone and i mean everyone is entitled to their opinion.
But everyone and i mean everyone is entitled to criticise that opinion.
If you put it out their and expect nobody to question it or criticise it perhaps you shouldn't put it out there in the first place.
I would like to think we are all thick-skinned enough to cope with it and not resort to "i am telling on you" but really i don't care.
If some self righteous person thinks people are stalking/harassing them, when in reality they are just being critical, they need to grow up.
We are all big boys/girls/thems? and should be able to take criticism on the chin.
And remember if you type it, own it, and be prepared for the onslaught.
Debate is fine scotchy. Following people round forums just to dish out insults is another thing. I get it, people post on here late at night, after they are perhaps a little ‘relaxed’ and might get carried away. I just don’t appreciate being followed around these forums by people who have beef with me in other threads, because they are still *still* bitter that they lost the vote on the agreement.

They drag these threads off topic by doing so and ruin the place for everyone. Attack the opinion, not the poster. That or just ignore.
I doubt anybody follows you around they just see your posts on the most recent threads, as I regularly do, given you seem to post on most recent threads I'd imagine it would be hard to not see your recent posts TBH.
God you love to play the victim Lou, you post something, somebody criticises it, they must be stalking/harassing me.
It doesn't matter who is commenting on it, that's what happens, if it's the same person every time it makes no difference, if you post something expect criticism and to complain about it is daft as everyone who posts online want a reaction.