ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

The CWU Update on Facebook

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
hans solo
Posts: 3256
Joined: 06 Feb 2011, 18:08
Gender: Male

Re: The CWU Update on Facebook

Post by hans solo »

Anyone who works in delivery needs their head looked at if voting yes
This is total surrender from CWU
Timetomoveon
Posts: 82
Joined: 12 Apr 2023, 18:14
Gender: Male

Re: The CWU Update on Facebook

Post by Timetomoveon »

ebbzie wrote:
22 Jun 2023, 18:20
I could only manage 10 minutes of it. They are so out of touch with what all these changes will do to us.
They banging on about needing change. What happened to the no strings pay rise ?? What happened to "we no you dont want later start/finishing times?
This deal is a complete sell out
NO from me
Definitely looks like they’ve been got at. Was it the threat of stopping subs being taken from wages🤔
18 f***ing pay and A/L lost for that!
ted_e_bear
Posts: 3932
Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
Gender: Male

Re: The CWU Update on Facebook

Post by ted_e_bear »

heraldmoth wrote:
22 Jun 2023, 19:04
Is it me or have they both put on weight since all this began and while we’ve been flogged for f***ing 6%
Perhaps we could suggest they, and Chris Webb plus that other guy Tony Bouch who just put a massive post on here all come down to work at a DO for a while, maybe even as new starters (hopefully no one will recognise them) I'm sure after a month or so being swapped about on different van share duties they'll see everything from a different perspective.
Neebs
Posts: 55
Joined: 08 May 2023, 15:14
Gender: Male

Re: The CWU Update on Facebook

Post by Neebs »

If you have kids to pick up or other commitments you need to start looking for new work if this gets voted in ..they don't care and don't understand what local management are link .
Watched the whole thing .
they have no idea what posties are facing day in day out .
If and buts on start times
Still can't bring themselves to say statutory sick pay =£0 per day for the first 4 days .
I could go on but I need a rest .
Still voting no
scotchy1962
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 847
Joined: 25 Mar 2020, 16:55
Gender: Male

Re: The CWU Update on Facebook

Post by scotchy1962 »

Looks like even the union have deserted us now.
They may hope they get their yes vote, as our plan B doesn't include any of them in it.
Piss poor effort i may add and not even a good defence of the indefensible agreement.
I will vote No and see what way it falls, i now have a rather morbid delight in the prospect of a no vote as i want to see the reaction of these three surrender monkeys as their world implodes.
Just like ours in delivery are with this agreement.
ANDREW CROCOMBE
Posts: 247
Joined: 06 Apr 2018, 18:36
Gender: Male

Re: The CWU Update on Facebook

Post by ANDREW CROCOMBE »

Well interesting eh. So Royal Mail are going to cut revisions and employ thousands to achieve QOS and the USO with 100% clearance. All for probs around £1,000 at best and with a 3-4pm finish time ( for length of agreement) then it will be later again. Why with a 24/7 operation does everything have to be later. ? R.M are not well organised, well ran, or have any plans how to make this work. Get some proper Logistics folk to sort this sorry mob out once and for all.
kazardaimenu
Posts: 1391
Joined: 13 Apr 2022, 19:11
Gender: Male

Re: The CWU Update on Facebook

Post by kazardaimenu »

These have no idea how the job is done. Full of bluster but no real explanation. Raising the point of ‘expanding the role of postal workers’ again, what’s this all about? Delivering into the evening? No thanks.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32660
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: The CWU Update on Facebook

Post by POSTMAN »

'Apparently', Ward said this...

by voting yes for this agreement, it will allow us to fight in the future to change what is in the agreement.

new entrant T&C's are that bad Royal Mail will have to change them.


No doubt they will have the video snippets again in the next few days, will post than as they come.

:funneh
Also 3.5k comments, 3k are peeps saying where they are from.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
TopperGas
Posts: 3273
Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
Gender: Male

Re: The CWU Update on Facebook

Post by TopperGas »

hans solo wrote:
22 Jun 2023, 18:50
Prepared to give up 6 day uso now
Everything we stood against last year is being accepted
They have deffo been got at
Tell you what Dave why don’t you try a delivery
I'm shocked any union would approve an employer's move which will lead to 10K's of job losses, evening considering a joint approach to the Government!
guardianangel
Posts: 1782
Joined: 21 Feb 2020, 19:40
Gender: Male

Re: The CWU Update on Facebook

Post by guardianangel »

Yes we need change but the members need better t's and c's and pay to make that change not worse,what planet are the CWU from,i wouldn't like to say what our fathers and grandfathers would of done to you.
FilthyBloke
Posts: 685
Joined: 03 Jun 2018, 11:41
Gender: Male

Re: The CWU Update on Facebook

Post by FilthyBloke »

It was poorly managed by the CWU from the word go.
Empty slogans and nothing more.
Royal Mail knew they had to ride out the storm and yet the storm never really came.

It was inevitable that RM and ST were not going to budge because in my opinion they knew that this CWU is as weak as it’s ever been. Not the members. But the union itself. They tried to tag along with the other news worthy strikes going on in the country at the time and seemed to spend most of their arguments insulting ST and going around in circles. It probably became too personal between dave ward and ST but ST had all the aces.

Once the empty slogans ran their course the union had no choice but to pretty much surrender. At first the union came out waving a feather duster and by the end it was a white flag.

I still think a two week strike in august and then October could, possibly, have had more of a grip than the pointless one and two day strikes. It would also have given the postie opportunity to find a temp job for that week or two as it’s easy to join an agency for a couple of weeks than it is for an odd day here and an odd day there.

But now the union seem pleased with their ‘victory’.
The postie has lost. It’s still an ok job to those who it suits but the job most of us know has gone. I don’t blame the union as such. They ain’t my union. I never thought they would win anyway. But their lack of understanding to the average postie who now has to look at child care issues or working longer in the heat or cold is actually insulting to those who pay subs.
Last edited by FilthyBloke on 22 Jun 2023, 20:16, edited 1 time in total.
hans solo
Posts: 3256
Joined: 06 Feb 2011, 18:08
Gender: Male

Re: The CWU Update on Facebook

Post by hans solo »

There s**t scared they have been told to get this deal through or RM will cut their CWU subsidies and the f***ers will be out working
George Orwell animal farm
jahbalon
Posts: 149
Joined: 21 Apr 2023, 18:43
Gender: Male

Re: The CWU Update on Facebook

Post by jahbalon »

The agitators on this forum who are spouting they are going to vote no, no matter what concessions and improvements the CWU attain, should do us all a favour and just quit the job if they are so unhappy. :cuppa

The Silent Majority on here at sick to our back teeth hearing your ungrateful whining and complaining, and are just happy to have a job, pay increase and lump sum to get on with our lives and protecting our families futures and prospects. :no no

Sabotaging our precious jobs and the Company is not Democracy, it's Communism :thumbdown
Mickeybrowneyes
Posts: 410
Joined: 12 Sep 2021, 06:18
Gender: Male

Re: The CWU Update on Facebook

Post by Mickeybrowneyes »

Neebs wrote:
22 Jun 2023, 19:41
If you have kids to pick up or other commitments you need to start looking for new work if this gets voted in ..they don't care and don't understand what local management are link .
Watched the whole thing .
they have no idea what posties are facing day in day out .
If and buts on start times
Still can't bring themselves to say statutory sick pay =£0 per day for the first 4 days .
I could go on but I need a rest .
Still voting no
They have served notice on the planes.
The work will arrive later. A No vote will not change that.
At least with a yes vote family friendly options can be explored and alternative attendance patterns.
It is too expensive to fly the work now and there is a capacity issue transporting parcels on planes now.
This will not change.
People that are voting no for this sole reason really need to grasp this fact.
We are starting later whatever the outcome.
Our sick policy is still better than most firms even with the changes.
Voting No is people's porogative but voting down an agreement for something that cannot be changed now is futile.
FilthyBloke
Posts: 685
Joined: 03 Jun 2018, 11:41
Gender: Male

Re: The CWU Update on Facebook

Post by FilthyBloke »

jahbalon wrote:
22 Jun 2023, 20:19
The agitators on this forum who are spouting they are going to vote no, no matter what concessions and improvements the CWU attain, should do us all a favour and just quit the job if they are so unhappy. :cuppa

The Silent Majority on here at sick to our back teeth hearing your ungrateful whining and complaining, and are just happy to have a job, pay increase and lump sum to get on with our lives and protecting our families futures and prospects. :no no

Sabotaging our precious jobs and the Company is not Democracy, it's Communism :thumbdown
Yep. For me it’s still an ideal job. Decent pay for what it is and still flexible enough.