ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

LTB 160/23 - Business Recovery, Transformation and Growth Agreement - Paragraph 6.4 Joint Working Group to look at sick absence levels...

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32612
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

LTB 160/23 - Business Recovery, Transformation and Growth Agreement - Paragraph 6.4 Joint Working Group to look at sick absence levels...

Post by POSTMAN »

https://www.cwu.org/ltb/ltb-160-23-b-r- ... h-6-4-jwg/

LTB 160/23 – B R T & G AGREEMENT – PARAGRAPH 6.4 JWG
No: 160/23

21st June 2023

Dear Colleague

ROYAL MAIL GROUP: BRT&G AGREEMENT PARAGRAPH 6.4 – JOINT WORKING GROUP

Branches and Representatives will recall the terms of paragraph 6.4 of the national Business Recovery, Transformation and Growth (BRT&G) Agreement and in particular the joint commitment in clauses 6.4.1 and 6.4.2 to establish a Joint Working Group (JWG) to look at sick absence levels, the causes of sick absence, cost of sick absence, the migration from one agreement to another, welcome back meetings and attendance standards.

In an attempt to move the aforementioned joint commitments ahead and in order to take the initiative, at a recent meeting the Postal Executive endorsed a proposed ‘Terms of Reference’ for the JWG. This has been sent to Royal Mail for their consideration.

It is now important the ‘Terms of Reference’ are quickly agreed and a mutually convenient date is set for an initial meeting and a further series of JWG meetings. In advance of this we will be requesting comprehensive ‘sick absence’ data from RMG to ensure the terms of the agreement are delivered.

Branches and representatives will appreciate the JWG will involve a comprehensive period of activity and there is much to be discussed. The CWU JWG members led by Carl Maden, will undertake this work with a positive mind-set and we have impressed upon RMG the need to mirror this approach.

Further updates will be provided in due course.

Any enquiries concerning the content of this LTB should be addressed to Carl Maden PTCS Department.

Yours sincerely



Andy Furey Carl Maden
Acting Deputy General Secretary (Postal) Assistant Secretary
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
hans solo
Posts: 3238
Joined: 06 Feb 2011, 18:08
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 160/23 - Business Recovery, Transformation and Growth Agreement - Paragraph 6.4 Joint Working Group to look at sick absence levels...

Post by hans solo »

It the f***ing CWU leadership and RM incompetence that has caused increases in sick due to mental health issues
k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

Re: LTB 160/23 - Business Recovery, Transformation and Growth Agreement - Paragraph 6.4 Joint Working Group to look at sick absence levels...

Post by k979aaa »

It's just another way to turnover staff but the new ones run to the hills as soon as they see this going on!
sindba
Posts: 1436
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 160/23 - Business Recovery, Transformation and Growth Agreement - Paragraph 6.4 Joint Working Group to look at sick absence levels...

Post by sindba »

"Joint Working Group" eh?

So RM say "jump", CWU say "how high, Sir?"

Job done, another groundbreaking agreement about crushing the most vulnerable part of the workforce is reached.
seaside
Posts: 266
Joined: 31 May 2013, 18:51
Gender: Female

Re: LTB 160/23 - Business Recovery, Transformation and Growth Agreement - Paragraph 6.4 Joint Working Group to look at sick absence levels...

Post by seaside »

The size of walks is the main reason that sickness is so high, 4 hours plus non stop in what ever weather. Maybe an idea if they at least looked at making the walks shorter, personally I would prefer to loose 2 hours a day pay, for 2 hours less out walking, less aches and pains, plus less chance of going sick with sore knees hips feet and back pain. Or made it more easier to do job share, it would give those that wanted it more time to recover.
toonshola
Posts: 872
Joined: 29 Jul 2011, 16:31
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 160/23 - Business Recovery, Transformation and Growth Agreement - Paragraph 6.4 Joint Working Group to look at sick absence levels...

Post by toonshola »

Ah the good old joint working group. Nice little meetings with tea and biscuits for the lazy feckless overpaid union bods whilst we are pummelled into the ground. Few weeks of talks and they will conclude Royal Mail were correct in the first place. Honestly can’t wait for my ballot this week, big cross in the no box then i can withdraw my financial support to this ridiculous corrupt “union”.
k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

Re: LTB 160/23 - Business Recovery, Transformation and Growth Agreement - Paragraph 6.4 Joint Working Group to look at sick absence levels...

Post by k979aaa »

seaside wrote:
21 Jun 2023, 16:51
The size of walks is the main reason that sickness is so high, 4 hours plus non stop in what ever weather. Maybe an idea if they at least looked at making the walks shorter, personally I would prefer to loose 2 hours a day pay, for 2 hours less out walking, less aches and pains, plus less chance of going sick with sore knees hips feet and back pain. Or made it more easier to do job share, it would give those that wanted it more time to recover.
When I started in the late 1980's we had a First and Second delivery with a meal break/relife in between it could be done and should be done with our union starting it!
seaside
Posts: 266
Joined: 31 May 2013, 18:51
Gender: Female

Re: LTB 160/23 - Business Recovery, Transformation and Growth Agreement - Paragraph 6.4 Joint Working Group to look at sick absence levels...

Post by seaside »

Remember it well, started in the early 80s. When we had a canteen.
seaside
Posts: 266
Joined: 31 May 2013, 18:51
Gender: Female

Re: LTB 160/23 - Business Recovery, Transformation and Growth Agreement - Paragraph 6.4 Joint Working Group to look at sick absence levels...

Post by seaside »

seaside wrote:
21 Jun 2023, 16:51
The size of walks is the main reason that sickness is so high, 4 hours plus non stop in what ever weather. Maybe an idea if they at least looked at making the walks shorter, personally I would prefer to loose 2 hours a day pay, for 2 hours less out walking, less aches and pains, plus less chance of going sick with sore knees hips feet and back pain. Or made it more easier to do job share, it would give those that wanted it more time to recover.
So if this could be brought in, it would cost royal mail nothing, and in my opinion would bring down sick absence levels. Would be nice to see the union trying to get this looked at.
X_hamster
Posts: 96
Joined: 07 Feb 2013, 10:53
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 160/23 - Business Recovery, Transformation and Growth Agreement - Paragraph 6.4 Joint Working Group to look at sick absence levels...

Post by X_hamster »

sindba wrote:
21 Jun 2023, 16:39
"Joint Working Group" eh?

So RM say "jump", CWU say "how high, Sir?"

Job done, another groundbreaking agreement about crushing the most vulnerable part of the workforce is reached.
Plenty of lovely union release time though to get told what to do.

Whilst the workers are out in the dark on a Saturday.

As if they will ever reverse the sick policy if voted through in the sell out. The reality is they will be licking their lips for more.
k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

Re: LTB 160/23 - Business Recovery, Transformation and Growth Agreement - Paragraph 6.4 Joint Working Group to look at sick absence levels...

Post by k979aaa »

seaside wrote:
21 Jun 2023, 17:19
seaside wrote:
21 Jun 2023, 16:51
The size of walks is the main reason that sickness is so high, 4 hours plus non stop in what ever weather. Maybe an idea if they at least looked at making the walks shorter, personally I would prefer to loose 2 hours a day pay, for 2 hours less out walking, less aches and pains, plus less chance of going sick with sore knees hips feet and back pain. Or made it more easier to do job share, it would give those that wanted it more time to recover.
So if this could be brought in, it would cost royal mail nothing, and in my opinion would bring down sick absence levels. Would be nice to see the union trying to get this looked at.
Your basically just voting for part time hours.
Why not do 37 hours the union get an agreement so no one can do more than 3 hours without a meal relife of 40 minutes . At least you can go rest and eat sit down and go to the toilet. And do the rest of your hours!
1560loopsayear
Posts: 230
Joined: 05 Mar 2019, 18:33
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 160/23 - Business Recovery, Transformation and Growth Agreement - Paragraph 6.4 Joint Working Group to look at sick absence levels...

Post by 1560loopsayear »

Jeez if there's one job out there that your more prone to being off sick it's this one. It used to be just down to fatigue, wear & tear, nasty 24hr bugs because your out all hours in all weather but now they added to our mental fragility too with harassment, bullying and the overall deconstruction of our morale. So they've only themselves to blame for sick absence levels.
seaside
Posts: 266
Joined: 31 May 2013, 18:51
Gender: Female

Re: LTB 160/23 - Business Recovery, Transformation and Growth Agreement - Paragraph 6.4 Joint Working Group to look at sick absence levels...

Post by seaside »

k979aaa wrote:
21 Jun 2023, 17:51
seaside wrote:
21 Jun 2023, 17:19
seaside wrote:
21 Jun 2023, 16:51
The size of walks is the main reason that sickness is so high, 4 hours plus non stop in what ever weather. Maybe an idea if they at least looked at making the walks shorter, personally I would prefer to loose 2 hours a day pay, for 2 hours less out walking, less aches and pains, plus less chance of going sick with sore knees hips feet and back pain. Or made it more easier to do job share, it would give those that wanted it more time to recover.
So if this could be brought in, it would cost royal mail nothing, and in my opinion would bring down sick absence levels. Would be nice to see the union trying to get this looked at.
Your basically just voting for part time hours.
Why not do 37 hours the union get an agreement so no one can do more than 3 hours without a meal relife of 40 minutes . At least you can go rest and eat sit down and go to the toilet. And do the rest of your hours!
Yes that would be a better idea, but less of a chance of the union trying to get it or being able to get it.
k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

Re: LTB 160/23 - Business Recovery, Transformation and Growth Agreement - Paragraph 6.4 Joint Working Group to look at sick absence levels...

Post by k979aaa »

seaside wrote:
21 Jun 2023, 18:06
k979aaa wrote:
21 Jun 2023, 17:51
seaside wrote:
21 Jun 2023, 17:19
seaside wrote:
21 Jun 2023, 16:51
The size of walks is the main reason that sickness is so high, 4 hours plus non stop in what ever weather. Maybe an idea if they at least looked at making the walks shorter, personally I would prefer to loose 2 hours a day pay, for 2 hours less out walking, less aches and pains, plus less chance of going sick with sore knees hips feet and back pain. Or made it more easier to do job share, it would give those that wanted it more time to recover.
So if this could be brought in, it would cost royal mail nothing, and in my opinion would bring down sick absence levels. Would be nice to see the union trying to get this looked at.
Your basically just voting for part time hours.
Why not do 37 hours the union get an agreement so no one can do more than 3 hours without a meal relife of 40 minutes . At least you can go rest and eat sit down and go to the toilet. And do the rest of your hours!
Yes that would be a better idea, but less of a chance of the union trying to get it or being able to get it.
Maybe we should insist on it we do have a say don't we!
worktotime
Posts: 2860
Joined: 14 May 2010, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 160/23 - Business Recovery, Transformation and Growth Agreement - Paragraph 6.4 Joint Working Group to look at sick absence levels...

Post by worktotime »

toonshola wrote:
21 Jun 2023, 16:53
Ah the good old joint working group. Nice little meetings with tea and biscuits for the lazy feckless overpaid union bods whilst we are pummelled into the ground. Few weeks of talks and they will conclude Royal Mail were correct in the first place. Honestly can’t wait for my ballot this week, big cross in the no box then i can withdraw my financial support to this ridiculous corrupt “union”.
:Applause , me to :thumbup