ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
CWU UPDATE
-
BELIAL
- Posts: 6758
- Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
- Gender: Female
- Location: Nowhere
-
Binsey
- Posts: 389
- Joined: 14 Aug 2015, 17:33
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU UPDATE
Whatever happened to free speech and sarcasm…..🥸
-
yellowbelly
- Posts: 3624
- Joined: 23 Jun 2015, 15:51
- Gender: Male
-
postieblueshirt
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: 01 Oct 2019, 22:05
- Gender: Male
-
freespeech
- MDEC
- Posts: 762
- Joined: 28 Jun 2007, 16:35
-
funkflex55
- Posts: 688
- Joined: 04 Sep 2022, 22:58
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU UPDATE
-
CRIBMAD
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 835
- Joined: 11 Oct 2016, 13:38
- Gender: Male
-
CRIBMAD
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 835
- Joined: 11 Oct 2016, 13:38
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU UPDATE
-
aiden01
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 7001
- Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
- Gender: Male
-
LouBarlow
- Posts: 4682
- Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56
Re: CWU UPDATE
It’s not going to happen. Sad excuse for a human being? I’m trying to look out for the OP and likewise this very forum. Where else would you go to scream incoherent ramblings if it closed down because of legal action? I’m trying to help you, despite your abuse. Be thankful not angry.
-
toonshola
- Posts: 888
- Joined: 29 Jul 2011, 16:31
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU UPDATE
Have you perhaps paid attention to the legal challenges and f**k ups the CWU has presented us over the last 5 years? I think the OP and this forum is pretty safe looking at past evidence.LouBarlow wrote: ↑16 Jun 2023, 05:03It’s not going to happen. Sad excuse for a human being? I’m trying to look out for the OP and likewise this very forum. Where else would you go to scream incoherent ramblings if it closed down because of legal action? I’m trying to help you, despite your abuse. Be thankful not angry.
-
LouBarlow
- Posts: 4682
- Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56
Re: CWU UPDATE
Libel and defamation action is definitely easier to bring about though, especially when the target is a union leader personally. You can’t make up something, plonk Dave’s name underneath it and be exempt. It is the easiest legal action to win. As I said, it was funny though. Just risky for everyone involved.toonshola wrote: ↑16 Jun 2023, 05:43Have you perhaps paid attention to the legal challenges and f**k ups the CWU has presented us over the last 5 years? I think the OP and this forum is pretty safe looking at past evidence.LouBarlow wrote: ↑16 Jun 2023, 05:03It’s not going to happen. Sad excuse for a human being? I’m trying to look out for the OP and likewise this very forum. Where else would you go to scream incoherent ramblings if it closed down because of legal action? I’m trying to help you, despite your abuse. Be thankful not angry.
-
CamPostie
- Posts: 178
- Joined: 17 Jan 2022, 18:56
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU UPDATE
No it’s not!LouBarlow wrote: ↑16 Jun 2023, 06:19Libel and defamation action is definitely easier to bring about though, especially when the target is a union leader personally. You can’t make up something, plonk Dave’s name underneath it and be exempt. It is the easiest legal action to win. As I said, it was funny though. Just risky for everyone involved.toonshola wrote: ↑16 Jun 2023, 05:43Have you perhaps paid attention to the legal challenges and f**k ups the CWU has presented us over the last 5 years? I think the OP and this forum is pretty safe looking at past evidence.LouBarlow wrote: ↑16 Jun 2023, 05:03It’s not going to happen. Sad excuse for a human being? I’m trying to look out for the OP and likewise this very forum. Where else would you go to scream incoherent ramblings if it closed down because of legal action? I’m trying to help you, despite your abuse. Be thankful not angry.
Libel and defamation cases are an expensive process - and to prove defamation (libel is spoken word) the party bringing the case would have to prove “serious harm” was caused to the reputation of the person(s)/party(s) involved.
So for starters, in this scenario any case brought would need to prove that this parody statement could have been believed to have been an actual statement by the CWU be a significant proportion of the union’s membership.
There is therefore very little prospect of a defamation case, if brought, being successful in this instance - especially as a high ranking member of the CWU commented that it was “very funny!”
TLDR; you’re talking dinkum!
-
Surfpostie
- Posts: 93
- Joined: 01 Apr 2014, 19:50
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU UPDATE
I did find it very funny,but of lighthearted fun at this time. But what it says is that the members think the Union bigwigs are a joke. I remember Webby saying there was going to be so much communication,that we would get peed off with all the comms! If Dave,Andy,Webby or Martin are reading all these posts,then please let us know what the hell is going on. Don’t forget how much we backed the CWU when you called for our support. Don’t forget how much money we all lost. Don’t forget we pay your wages,so give us a lowdown of what if anything is going on with RM & CWU. I don’t think it’s a lot to ask,then we can have more clarity.
-
postslippete
- Posts: 4099
- Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU UPDATE
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.