ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Agreement on agreement reached

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
LouBarlow
Posts: 4682
Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56

Re: Agreement on agreement reached

Post by LouBarlow »

chickenwittle wrote:
15 Jun 2023, 10:50

And what about the next agreement in a couple of years time ? Same again, more erosion of t&cs , where does it end ? If you roll over now and accept this , it’s just the start.
You don’t seem to understand. We have no leverage here. That came and went when we were on strike on Christmas Eve, when ultimately any power we had by withdrawing labour evaporated. The reason for this, is both the CWU and RM are now in acquiescence at the state of the company. You can’t squeeze blood out of a stone. RM pissed away the profits we all made for them, during the pandemic, and now that traffic has dried up, and costs are sky high, the coffers are bare.

We have been screwed over, but you have to think logically and realise that voting no hurts us all. Your protest vote will not lead to an improved deal on the table, and it will not in any way hurt the rich bosses running the company. Even if the unlikely happens and RM goes under, do you think that the wealthy board will give a s**t? No, it will be me and you that suffer. Hell, even if you believe the CWU upper echelon are somehow conspiring against you, they have nothing to lose either way. Think what is best for you going forward.
hans solo
Posts: 3256
Joined: 06 Feb 2011, 18:08
Gender: Male

Re: Agreement on agreement reached

Post by hans solo »

No mate I’m voting no
And I don’t give a s**t about the company any more
Treat them with the same contempt they have me/us
If it goes under so be it
Everything comes to and end
LancePercival
Posts: 26
Joined: 11 Jun 2023, 18:08
Gender: Male

Re: Agreement on agreement reached

Post by LancePercival »

Its a no from me,
fonic
Posts: 11
Joined: 30 Jul 2013, 20:37
Gender: Male

Re: Agreement on agreement reached

Post by fonic »

For the algorithm, hoping for a massive no vote like we've never seen before 99.9 percent no vote would be amazing :Very Happy
richietns
Posts: 1070
Joined: 17 Oct 2011, 18:09
Gender: Male

Re: Agreement on agreement reached

Post by richietns »

chickenwittle wrote:
15 Jun 2023, 10:50
LouBarlow wrote:
15 Jun 2023, 09:55
Neebs wrote:
15 Jun 2023, 09:37

So we only get the gospel truth on here .
I think not .
If it's a no vote the the union have no choice but to get back in the room and really is that simple .
I'm don't care about the s**t pay rise but I do care about my t&C's and the extra 1.30hr out door work that's hidden within the agreement, that most people haven't read from start to finish so won't realise what's about to hit them if the listen to folk like yourself .
Remove the attacks on our t&C's then we may get somewhere ,but I'm not holding my breath on this as the cwu have shown us who they really are in bed with and it's not it's members.
Still voting no
I can understand not believing Royal Mail, but why are you doubting what the CWU are telling you? What evidence do you have to back up your claim? I get it, we exist in a world now, where people believe everything is a conspiracy, but the facts have been laid out clearly before you, especially so on here.

And again, how does voting no prevent anything you are (rightly) worried about being forced through regardless, and then some? Having no agreement in place doesn’t prevent RM from instigating the change necessary required to turn around the company’s finances. It leaves us all exposed to even more attacks on our T&Cs not less. As I’ve said multiple times now, the deal is bad, but not having an agreement will be worse and will not stop us being hit by change. It is coming regardless. Better to have at least some control of it.

I understand people voting no out of anger or under protest, but ultimately you are spiting yourself as RM will not give a toss. Think rationally about what is best for you.
And what about the next agreement in a couple of years time ? Same again, more erosion of t&cs , where does it end ? If you roll over now and accept this , it’s just the start.
It started a decade ago Moya and back have just paved the way,it was back who started the superhubs Thompson just accelerated it.
LouBarlow
Posts: 4682
Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56

Re: Agreement on agreement reached

Post by LouBarlow »

richietns wrote:
15 Jun 2023, 14:32

It started a decade ago Moya and back have just paved the way,it was back who started the superhubs Thompson just accelerated it.
Yes, it started when we were privatised. It is a miracle we have had it so good to this point. There is no going back when a company is designated as a private enterprise, as capitalism doesn’t care about the people employed to fuel it. You and I are just a cog in the machine, there to make as much money, as fast as possible, with no regard for our wellbeing.
Rommagic
Posts: 1454
Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 16:52

Re: Agreement on agreement reached

Post by Rommagic »

Update today?.
Jb1969
Posts: 376
Joined: 29 May 2014, 13:06
Gender: Male

Re: Agreement on agreement reached

Post by Jb1969 »

Next week apparently!
ted_e_bear
Posts: 3932
Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
Gender: Male

Re: Agreement on agreement reached

Post by ted_e_bear »

LouBarlow wrote:
15 Jun 2023, 14:39
richietns wrote:
15 Jun 2023, 14:32

It started a decade ago Moya and back have just paved the way,it was back who started the superhubs Thompson just accelerated it.
Yes, it started when we were privatised. It is a miracle we have had it so good to this point. There is no going back when a company is designated as a private enterprise, as capitalism doesn’t care about the people employed to fuel it. You and I are just a cog in the machine, there to make as much money, as fast as possible, with no regard for our wellbeing.
I agree with that, it's taken ages to get down to this all time low point, until quite recently at DO level it was as though nothing had changed, although it's clear the pace has accelerated rapidly these last few months.
Wigglypark
Posts: 48
Joined: 21 Dec 2017, 08:01
Gender: Male

Re: Agreement on agreement reached

Post by Wigglypark »

:dance
hans solo wrote:
15 Jun 2023, 14:19
No mate I’m voting no
And I don’t give a s**t about the company any more
Treat them with the same contempt they have me/us
If it goes under so be it
Everything comes to and end
Too right, if this company needs to exploit the workers and lower their conditions (race to the bottom) just so they can make shareholders happy the company should be let to go to the wall, other companies will pick up the work and employ more staff.
The union officials are bricking themselves because it looks like the gravy train is about to eject them for not having a valid ticket, all reps and officials if they had an ounce of dignity would step down
richj2009
Posts: 256
Joined: 22 Oct 2009, 17:24
Gender: Male

Re: Agreement on agreement reached

Post by richj2009 »

Ok so we agree to everything else within the agreement but sick pay really???. If that needs to happen to save the business then it's already dead and buried.
thefox
Posts: 1143
Joined: 24 Aug 2010, 20:09
Gender: Male

Re: Agreement on agreement reached

Post by thefox »

It's a no from me,i don't have any idea where we go next if it comes back a no,i have no plan b nor do i have any idea who replaces ward and co i only know i can't vote yes for such a terrible deal and will take my chances.if it gets as bad as some have predicted i will leave and find another job.
stevejm
Posts: 488
Joined: 09 Dec 2017, 16:16
Gender: Male

Re: Agreement on agreement reached

Post by stevejm »

LouBarlow wrote:
15 Jun 2023, 14:14
chickenwittle wrote:
15 Jun 2023, 10:50

And what about the next agreement in a couple of years time ? Same again, more erosion of t&cs , where does it end ? If you roll over now and accept this , it’s just the start.
You don’t seem to understand. We have no leverage here. That came and went when we were on strike on Christmas Eve, when ultimately any power we had by withdrawing labour evaporated. The reason for this, is both the CWU and RM are now in acquiescence at the state of the company. You can’t squeeze blood out of a stone. RM pissed away the profits we all made for them, during the pandemic, and now that traffic has dried up, and costs are sky high, the coffers are bare.

We have been screwed over, but you have to think logically and realise that voting no hurts us all. Your protest vote will not lead to an improved deal on the table, and it will not in any way hurt the rich bosses running the company. Even if the unlikely happens and RM goes under, do you think that the wealthy board will give a s**t? No, it will be me and you that suffer. Hell, even if you believe the CWU upper echelon are somehow conspiring against you, they have nothing to lose either way. Think what is best for you going forward.
Bolded >the company is not about to go under nor is it close to being broke. At the results conference Williams painted an upbeat picture to institutional investors regards the company's future revenue/profit trajectory.

A no vote sends a message to the company (and Union) that destruction of our T&C will never be accepted lightly. This is a good message to be sent by us and internalised by them. If we meekly accept the wanton destruction of our T&C then they will be back for what remains of out T&C the moment this agreement expires in 21 months time.

For those who say a no vote will see RM pile in and make all the changes as they see fit I ask a simple question - why haven't they done so already then?
ted_e_bear
Posts: 3932
Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
Gender: Male

Re: Agreement on agreement reached

Post by ted_e_bear »

richj2009 wrote:
15 Jun 2023, 16:30
Ok so we agree to everything else within the agreement but sick pay really???. If that needs to happen to save the business then it's already dead and buried.
It's the enforced extra hour or so out on delivery in the winter months that's unacceptable to me, now you've mentioned the sick pay I certainly don't want punishing if in a 12 month period I have to have a 2nd absence with the trots or something else that only causes a day or two off due to RM's inability to deal with the piss takers.
Woody Guthrie
Posts: 5166
Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: Agreement on agreement reached

Post by Woody Guthrie »

For those who say a no vote will see RM pile in and make all the changes as they see fit I ask a simple question - why haven't they done so already then?
I thought that was one of the major complaints during this dispute.
That the company was just implementing change as they saw fit?

You know..
Changes to VR..
Imposed revisions.
Changing start times.
Changing attendance patterns.

That sort of thing.
It was kind of a big deal.
Only dead fish follow the current