ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Glasgow reject deal

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
aiden01
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 7001
Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
Gender: Male

Re: Glasgow reject deal

Post by aiden01 »

Acca Dacca wrote:
12 May 2023, 11:19
aiden01 wrote:
12 May 2023, 09:51
Acca Dacca wrote:
11 May 2023, 22:14
aiden01 wrote:
11 May 2023, 21:44
DirtyHarry wrote:
11 May 2023, 21:23
Well done, Glasgow. :Applause
What if the members of the glasgow branch come back with a yes vote will mean nothing.like ive already said members make their own minds up.if you have to rely on your branch telling you how to vote god help us all.im sure the branches rejecting the agreement now probably recommended most of the pec.
It still takes balls for the branch to go against the leadership's recommendations no matter how you think the vote will go

I would be easier for some of them to just ''play the game'' and go along with it
Don,t understand how it takes balls its either a yes or a no.seems like a helluva lot of cwu members are voting no does that take balls also seeing leadership are recommending it.
I think it does take balls yes

It’s easier to accept defeat and just take what’s on offer and move on with a crap deal than it is to vote no and take a gamble that we deserve and can do better than that

We don’t know what the future looks like without this agreement but we certainly know how the future looks like with it…..
Just my opinion but don't think there will be a future without support for this agreement. def cannot see any more strikes being called so what is the way forward in the event of no deal.
jahbalon
Posts: 149
Joined: 21 Apr 2023, 18:43
Gender: Male

Re: Glasgow reject deal

Post by jahbalon »

I think the mood music will change with news of Thompson's imminent departure, and postal workers will vote with their pockets and common sense to accept the deal.

The stark alternative does not bear thinking about.
77SAMPOST77
PARCELFORCE
Posts: 365
Joined: 20 Sep 2022, 15:49
Gender: Male

Re: Glasgow reject deal

Post by 77SAMPOST77 »

jahbalon wrote:
12 May 2023, 15:22
I think the mood music will change with news of Thompson's imminent departure, and postal workers will vote with their pockets and common sense to accept the deal.

The stark alternative does not bear thinking about.
Nonsense , It is terrible deal whether Thompson is here or not , surely people are not stupid enough to vote this pathetic deal in ,

(The stark alternative) what nonsense are you on about , You have no clue what will happen so stop your pathetic childish scaremongering .
jahbalon
Posts: 149
Joined: 21 Apr 2023, 18:43
Gender: Male

Re: Glasgow reject deal

Post by jahbalon »

And your alternative is to lead postal workers by the nose like the Pied Piper over the cliff to joblessness, poverty, and destitution.? :oops: :oops:

Thank God the majority of postal workers are not as hare brained as you.
77SAMPOST77
PARCELFORCE
Posts: 365
Joined: 20 Sep 2022, 15:49
Gender: Male

Re: Glasgow reject deal

Post by 77SAMPOST77 »

jahbalon wrote:
12 May 2023, 15:35
And your alternative is to lead postal workers by the nose like the Pied Piper over the cliff to joblessness, poverty, and destitution.? :oops: :oops:

Thank God the majority of postal workers are not as hare brained as you.
Poverty and destitution what planet are you on ,

You might be a scared little rabbit but most of us are made of sterner stuff and will not give in to these bullies .
Burghboy
Posts: 224
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 09:19
Gender: Male

Re: Glasgow reject deal

Post by Burghboy »

jahbalon wrote:
12 May 2023, 15:35
And your alternative is to lead postal workers by the nose like the Pied Piper over the cliff to joblessness, poverty, and destitution.? :oops: :oops:

Thank God the majority of postal workers are not as hare brained as you.
No the alternative is to do what any true trade unionist should do and reject any deal that incorporates a two tier workforce. It goes against everything I believe in.
Am actually disgusted that union officials would even consider such an agreement.
Dave Ward has said himself the new contract are ‘disgusting’
X_hamster
Posts: 96
Joined: 07 Feb 2013, 10:53
Gender: Male

Re: Glasgow reject deal

Post by X_hamster »

jahbalon wrote:
12 May 2023, 15:35
And your alternative is to lead postal workers by the nose like the Pied Piper over the cliff to joblessness, poverty, and destitution.? :oops: :oops:

Thank God the majority of postal workers are not as hare brained as you.
Just be glad to have a job etc etc

Vote for this pish and see what they come for next and it won't be in 2025
FirstPost
Posts: 644
Joined: 16 Aug 2018, 09:37
Gender: Female

Re: Glasgow reject deal

Post by FirstPost »

Dave Fraud OUT!
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: Glasgow reject deal

Post by DirtyHarry »

aiden01 wrote:
11 May 2023, 21:44
DirtyHarry wrote:
11 May 2023, 21:23
Well done, Glasgow. :Applause
What if the members of the glasgow branch come back with a yes vote will mean nothing.like ive already said members make their own minds up.if you have to rely on your branch telling you how to vote god help us all.im sure the branches rejecting the agreement now probably recommended most of the pec.
I don't rely on my branch telling me how to vote.
What, in the name of God, gives you that ludicrous idea? :crazy:
pieoftheday
Posts: 1829
Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 16:43
Gender: Male

Re: Glasgow reject deal

Post by pieoftheday »

DirtyHarry wrote:
12 May 2023, 20:30
aiden01 wrote:
11 May 2023, 21:44
DirtyHarry wrote:
11 May 2023, 21:23
Well done, Glasgow. :Applause
What if the members of the glasgow branch come back with a yes vote will mean nothing.like ive already said members make their own minds up.if you have to rely on your branch telling you how to vote god help us all.im sure the branches rejecting the agreement now probably recommended most of the pec.
I don't rely on my branch telling me how to vote.
What, in the name of God, gives you that ludicrous idea? :crazy:
Well in the past we have relied on our union to recommend how to vote , trust. However this seems to have gone for many, myself included
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: Glasgow reject deal

Post by DirtyHarry »

pieoftheday wrote:
12 May 2023, 20:42
DirtyHarry wrote:
12 May 2023, 20:30
aiden01 wrote:
11 May 2023, 21:44
DirtyHarry wrote:
11 May 2023, 21:23
Well done, Glasgow. :Applause
What if the members of the glasgow branch come back with a yes vote will mean nothing.like ive already said members make their own minds up.if you have to rely on your branch telling you how to vote god help us all.im sure the branches rejecting the agreement now probably recommended most of the pec.
I don't rely on my branch telling me how to vote.
What, in the name of God, gives you that ludicrous idea? :crazy:
Well in the past we have relied on our union to recommend how to vote , trust. However this seems to have gone for many, myself included
And that's why the job has nosedived so dramatically these last 20 years.

I can't remember the last time I voted for a deal negotiated by the CWU.

In fact, I don't think I ever have.
aiden01
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 7001
Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
Gender: Male

Re: Glasgow reject deal

Post by aiden01 »

DirtyHarry wrote:
12 May 2023, 20:30
aiden01 wrote:
11 May 2023, 21:44
DirtyHarry wrote:
11 May 2023, 21:23
Well done, Glasgow. :Applause
What if the members of the glasgow branch come back with a yes vote will mean nothing.like ive already said members make their own minds up.if you have to rely on your branch telling you how to vote god help us all.im sure the branches rejecting the agreement now probably recommended most of the pec.
I don't rely on my branch telling me how to vote.
What, in the name of God, gives you that ludicrous idea? :crazy:
So why say well done glasgow.well done what only because they are saying no would you say the same well done to branches who have voted yes.no i doubt it ile say it again some great no people on here would love to see what box they actually tick when nobody else can see.
steve2zaf
Posts: 76
Joined: 22 Jan 2010, 16:21
Gender: Male

Re: Glasgow reject deal

Post by steve2zaf »

aiden01 wrote:
12 May 2023, 22:41
DirtyHarry wrote:
12 May 2023, 20:30
aiden01 wrote:
11 May 2023, 21:44
DirtyHarry wrote:
11 May 2023, 21:23
Well done, Glasgow. :Applause
What if the members of the glasgow branch come back with a yes vote will mean nothing.like ive already said members make their own minds up.if you have to rely on your branch telling you how to vote god help us all.im sure the branches rejecting the agreement now probably recommended most of the pec.
I don't rely on my branch telling me how to vote.
What, in the name of God, gives you that ludicrous idea? :crazy:
So why say well done glasgow.well done what only because they are saying no would you say the same well done to branches who have voted yes.no i doubt it ile say it again some great no people on here would love to see what box they actually tick when nobody else can see.
Why don't you take your propaganda and shove it where the sun doesn't shine . You are constantly questioning/challenging anyone who actually has the courage to say NO to the injustice happening. Just go back to your cushy , dry ,easy factory work . You are not a postie. you are an annoying doom monger stirring animosity because the vast majority on here have the opposite view to yourself . It annoys you immensely , which is quite satisfying.
enskied
Posts: 1876
Joined: 16 Aug 2013, 17:14
Gender: Male

Re: Glasgow reject deal

Post by enskied »

aiden01 wrote:
12 May 2023, 13:30
Acca Dacca wrote:
12 May 2023, 11:19
aiden01 wrote:
12 May 2023, 09:51
Acca Dacca wrote:
11 May 2023, 22:14
aiden01 wrote:
11 May 2023, 21:44
DirtyHarry wrote:
11 May 2023, 21:23
Well done, Glasgow. :Applause
What if the members of the glasgow branch come back with a yes vote will mean nothing.like ive already said members make their own minds up.if you have to rely on your branch telling you how to vote god help us all.im sure the branches rejecting the agreement now probably recommended most of the pec.
It still takes balls for the branch to go against the leadership's recommendations no matter how you think the vote will go

I would be easier for some of them to just ''play the game'' and go along with it
Don,t understand how it takes balls its either a yes or a no.seems like a helluva lot of cwu members are voting no does that take balls also seeing leadership are recommending it.
I think it does take balls yes

It’s easier to accept defeat and just take what’s on offer and move on with a crap deal than it is to vote no and take a gamble that we deserve and can do better than that

We don’t know what the future looks like without this agreement but we certainly know how the future looks like with it…..
Just my opinion but don't think there will be a future without support for this agreement. def cannot see any more strikes being called so what is the way forward in the event of no deal.
We can see our future Aiden and it's one we can not accept.

I will strike if that's my only option, for myself and for you . I'd rather not, no one wants to do that.

But I will .
aiden01
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 7001
Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
Gender: Male

Re: Glasgow reject deal

Post by aiden01 »

enskied wrote:
12 May 2023, 23:10
aiden01 wrote:
12 May 2023, 13:30
Acca Dacca wrote:
12 May 2023, 11:19
aiden01 wrote:
12 May 2023, 09:51
Acca Dacca wrote:
11 May 2023, 22:14
aiden01 wrote:
11 May 2023, 21:44
DirtyHarry wrote:
11 May 2023, 21:23
Well done, Glasgow. :Applause
What if the members of the glasgow branch come back with a yes vote will mean nothing.like ive already said members make their own minds up.if you have to rely on your branch telling you how to vote god help us all.im sure the branches rejecting the agreement now probably recommended most of the pec.
It still takes balls for the branch to go against the leadership's recommendations no matter how you think the vote will go

I would be easier for some of them to just ''play the game'' and go along with it
Don,t understand how it takes balls its either a yes or a no.seems like a helluva lot of cwu members are voting no does that take balls also seeing leadership are recommending it.
I think it does take balls yes

It’s easier to accept defeat and just take what’s on offer and move on with a crap deal than it is to vote no and take a gamble that we deserve and can do better than that

We don’t know what the future looks like without this agreement but we certainly know how the future looks like with it…..
Just my opinion but don't think there will be a future without support for this agreement. def cannot see any more strikes being called so what is the way forward in the event of no deal.
We can see our future Aiden and it's one we can not accept.

I will strike if that's my only option, for myself and for you . I'd rather not, no one wants to do that.

But I will .
Nothing to worry about mate yes we have different opinions but if deal is rejected an cwu call another strike ( which i seriously doubt) i will be on picket line again.