LTB 083/23 - ROYAL MAIL DISPUTE - CLAIMS RELATED TO INDUSTRIAL ACTION - EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER - ENGLAND & WALES

[enskied]

Grow up

No one listening Len.
All watching you

[redlen]

Seems the CWU bully boys are out in force tonight stifling debate and expression and behaving like pack animals, yet have a nerve saying managers do exactly the same to them

[enskied]

What do you do Len?
One of your friends came on to tell us that you are not a bad boy.
You aren't anything to do with delivery.

So what do you do Len?

You know nothing about our daily activity on post. Yest you constantly post on here.
Come on Len.
I'm a postman ... What is your role?

[enskied]

It's so quiet...

[clashcityrocker]

This obsession with Len and what he does is bordering on the homoerotic.
It really isn't very interesting.

Len could you post a picture of yourself dressed as a construction worker. A lot of people on this forum could get off on it.

[redlen]

They seem to be getting off/turned on to vent their pent up frustration on me as some sort of sexual fetish. A doctor would prescribe a cold shower, or a puncture repair kit.

[enskied]

Or you just say what your job is.
Then show your dick.

[TopperGas]

You cannot retrospect legislation

The Difficulty is these transgressions by CWU reps were committed after the EAT decision in Mercer -v- Alternative Future Group Ltd so already case law and precedent

The case of Alan Turing given a pardon is a prime example as at the time of the offence it was contrary to law, though repealed years later

Or how about you committed an act last week that was not contrary to law, but the following week contrary to a new law. You would not expect to be prosecuted

I think you are confusing criminal law with employment law, I'm content that my POV is correct in that if Employment Law is changed then any outstanding cases will follow on from that decision.

[redlen]

English Common law has a presumption that statutes do not have retrospective effect.

Employment Tribunals come under various statutory acts of parliament such as the Employment Rights Act 1996.

The Employment Tribunals being a court of law cannot change statute, only interpret the law and the will of parliament

Employment Appeal Tribunal decisions are civil law as they set case law

Employment Appeal Tribunal Decisions set case law and legal precedent from judgement with any future action from date of judgement as in let the decision stand unless appealed to an appellate court.

Any new cases after the EAT decision on the same/similar case history will follow that EAT decision, but not previous cases as the judgement has already been made.

So any OUTSTANDING claims to the Tribunal service NOT YET subject to judgement will follow the previous EAT decision

To be fair I could have been more clear in my post as wires seems to have been crossed

[scotchy1962]

English Common law has a presumption that statutes do not have retrospective effect.

Employment Tribunals come under various statutory acts of parliament such as the Employment Rights Act 1996.

The Employment Tribunals being a court of law cannot change statute, only interpret the law and the will of parliament

Employment Appeal Tribunal decisions are civil law as they set case law

Employment Appeal Tribunal Decisions set case law and legal precedent from judgement with any future action from date of judgement as in let the decision stand unless appealed to an appellate court.

Any new cases after the EAT decision on the same/similar case history will follow that EAT decision, but not previous cases as the judgement has already been made.

So any OUTSTANDING claims to the Tribunal service NOT YET subject to judgement will follow the previous EAT decision

To be fair I could have been more clear in my post as wires seems to have been crossed

Do you work in RMs legal dept? But not a part of the legal team just a clerk. Your google responses show no flair or insight but a flat word for word plagiarism of whatever you have looked up online. Its a bit sad that you feel the need to interact with us mere mortals daijy to feed your delusions, perhaps you could find another outlet for your undoubted talents. Just a thought Red.

[redlen]

What is it with this sexual animal attraction you have for me??

You are really not my type and not healthy this stalking.

Have you considered counseling as a sex addict or controlling your own personal narcissism being a major character flaw.

The definition of a bully being

A person who habitually seeks to harm or intimidate those whom they perceive as vulnerable.
"he is a ranting, domineering bully"

cyber-bullying is causing ‘alarm or distress’ to the victim (under the Harassment Act 1997). Or can be considered ‘grossly offensive’ (Malicious Communications Act 1988.

Cyber-Bullying is a type of bullying which can involve the victim being harassed, humiliated, embarrassed or otherwise targeted via the internet, social media or by mobile phone.

The Internet Forum owners and internet web hosting also have a legal duty to prevent all forms of bullying

You tick all the boxes

[clashcityrocker]

Do you work in RMs legal dept?

Why would anyone tell you where they work?
Do we all give the names of the office we work in?

For valid personal security issues some things should remain private.
Why this obsession?

[redlen]

Think it is about time the Forum moderators started taking a more active roll with a small minority of posters on this forum before things really start to get out of hand. Their continued conduct is unacceptable. If they are capable of this conduct on social media, what about colleagues at work?

[Acca Dacca]

What is it with this sexual animal attraction you have for me??

You are really not my type and not healthy this stalking.

Have you considered counseling as a sex addict or controlling your own personal narcissism being a major character flaw.

The definition of a bully being

A person who habitually seeks to harm or intimidate those whom they perceive as vulnerable.
"he is a ranting, domineering bully"

cyber-bullying is causing ‘alarm or distress’ to the victim (under the Harassment Act 1997). Or can be considered ‘grossly offensive’ (Malicious Communications Act 1988.

Cyber-Bullying is a type of bullying which can involve the victim being harassed, humiliated, embarrassed or otherwise targeted via the internet, social media or by mobile phone.

The Internet Forum owners and internet web hosting also have a legal duty to prevent all forms of bullying

You tick all the boxes

For your own sake len, please don’t defend yourself in court

Seek proper legal advice

[redlen]

Now what did I say about a small minority of posters that just seem incapable of leaving me alone?

Ask yourself, do you really want these sort of people to represent you at work in a disciplinary when capable of such conduct??