ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Financial difficulties

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
datasaint
Posts: 1541
Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 17:19
Gender: Male

Re: Financial difficulties

Post by datasaint »

Rommagic wrote:
27 Mar 2023, 15:43
Daniel Kretinsky Sake is 24 per cent now.
Yeah in IDS, not Royal Mail.

It's obvious GLS is the prize here.
TopperGas
Posts: 3500
Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
Gender: Male

Re: Financial difficulties

Post by TopperGas »

CamPostie wrote:
27 Mar 2023, 19:12
Rommagic wrote:
27 Mar 2023, 15:43
Daniel Kretinsky Sake is 24 per cent now.
That should put paid to the administration rumours - he’s not upping his stake if the shares are about to become worthless.
IDS aren't just Royal Mail though , it looks like DK either been told that a pay deal is imminent or RM is going to be put into admin and become somebody else's problem,
theotherone
Posts: 430
Joined: 04 Jun 2020, 21:58
Gender: Male

Re: Financial difficulties

Post by theotherone »

I think this is just another ploy to rid of the USO.
The administration order according to The Telegraph would only be for the letters (i.e the USO)
How do they go to the Government cap in hand the same time as being referred to OFCOM for the systematic failure of the USO?
redlen
Posts: 1347
Joined: 21 Dec 2021, 12:05
Gender: Male

Re: Financial difficulties

Post by redlen »

The USO includes packets/parcels and special delivery
TopperGas
Posts: 3500
Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
Gender: Male

Re: Financial difficulties

Post by TopperGas »

theotherone wrote:
27 Mar 2023, 21:33
I think this is just another ploy to rid of the USO.
The administration order according to The Telegraph would only be for the letters (i.e the USO)
How do they go to the Government cap in hand the same time as being referred to OFCOM for the systematic failure of the USO?
IDS won't be going "cap in hand" they'll be asking them to take over the running of RM from them, they'll earn nothing from the deal apart from getting RM off the books

If it does only relate to the USO will IDS still keep the parcel side of the business, if so, you can now see why they've been building hubs whilst spending little money on DO's/MCs. There could be 3 companies involved in the split, RM letter & packets, RM Tracked & large parcels/Parcel Force & GLS. the last two groups all then being merged into one big group in the UK, was this KW's/ST's plan all along hence why they proposed T&C's which were never likely to be agreed in order to manufacture a major dispute and also managed to keep the parcel side of the business ticking over during the dispute?