ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Martin Walsh has provided an update 24/3.
-
sixfoottwo
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 569
- Joined: 11 May 2017, 15:15
- Gender: Male
Re: Martin Walsh has provided an update 24/3.
Where's the actual update of the update that was promised to us today?
-
smartin1982
- Posts: 153
- Joined: 03 Sep 2020, 16:32
- Gender: Male
Re: Martin Walsh has provided an update 24/3.
You would have thought they’d have put up a decent fight to try and stop it then, wouldn’t you. Especially after having “the greatest voting turnout and result in union history”.walthmstowman wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 17:21Everything the Union warned us what could happen has pretty much happened.
They knew it was coming and they fu£&ked us with their incompetence
-
needadvice
- MDEC
- Posts: 244
- Joined: 20 Jun 2012, 23:39
- Gender: Female
Re: Martin Walsh has provided an update 24/3.
If we don't get an acceptable agreement the job will not be worthy. It really depends what this job does to your health. If you are walking 12 miles a day for little more than minimum wage then that is in my opinion an act of self harm and you will regret it in your 50's and beyondAcca Dacca wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 17:10Doing our job as it is for not much more than minimum wage is a line in the sand for many nevermind any of the changesrambo1 wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 17:01Solidarity BS. So they would rather the 100,000 or so colleagues they have, loose a job many of them NEED in whatever incarnation they come up with, than RM getting their way?
As long as you still have a finish time the job ain't gonna change drastically. How can it?
When I started our hourly rate was about £4 maybe even £5 more than minimum wage which reflected the physical nature of the job out in the elements
Now minimum wage has caught up big time and you add in the cost of living with inflation and you have many people questioning if this is a job worth keeping
-
datasaint
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 17:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Martin Walsh has provided an update 24/3.
I mean if this is a negotiating tactic by the RM board to threaten total collapse of the company unless they get their changes, it's either bloody genius or absolutely bonkers.
The union should never sell out their principles though. I'll not vote for anything that degrades Royal Mail into another Evri.
The union should never sell out their principles though. I'll not vote for anything that degrades Royal Mail into another Evri.
-
datasaint
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 17:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Martin Walsh has provided an update 24/3.
No the government appointed administrator's only role would be to fulfill the USO. That means parcels etc are of no importance.Nickvilla20 wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 17:23
The company won’t go under as you say the government can’t lets its postal service to go bust.
Politically it would be a disaster for the government too.
You would probably end up with a government bailout who would then end up selling it on at a loss like it did with Lloyd’s bank.
The company would be a shell of it's former self, and there's no telling how viable the USO would even be without money coming in from parcels so you could be looking at a 3 day a week USO, meaning half the work force wouldn't be required.
-
hans solo
- Posts: 3279
- Joined: 06 Feb 2011, 18:08
- Gender: Male
Re: Martin Walsh has provided an update 24/3.
Not quite
It’s only oversize packets that will go
No way would they cope with the masses of smaller ones
And who will deliver their election drivel
It’s only oversize packets that will go
No way would they cope with the masses of smaller ones
And who will deliver their election drivel
-
robking
- Posts: 236
- Joined: 19 Dec 2020, 12:14
- Gender: Male
Re: Martin Walsh has provided an update 24/3.
Those not required will receive a maximum tax free lump sum of £17130 (£17820 in Northern Ireland) statutory redundancy.norm wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 17:47No the government appointed administrator's only role would be to fulfill the USO. That means parcels etc are of no importance.Nickvilla20 wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 17:23
The company won’t go under as you say the government can’t lets its postal service to go bust.
Politically it would be a disaster for the government too.
You would probably end up with a government bailout who would then end up selling it on at a loss like it did with Lloyd’s bank.
The company would be a shell of it's former self, and there's no telling how viable the USO would even be without money coming in from parcels so you could be looking at a 3 day a week USO, meaning half the work force wouldn't be required.
-
guardianangel
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: 21 Feb 2020, 19:40
- Gender: Male
Re: Martin Walsh has provided an update 24/3.
Foxel wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 16:03Fight until the bitter end, for to surrender is to be defeated. Don't let them control you with fear, don't let their mistakes be your burden. From the ashes, new hope will be born. And when you look back you can say I stood for what was right despite the cost. Say you will not accept a future for you or your family where your suffering fills the pockets of the rich. Power to the proletariat.
-
Ppat98
- Posts: 217
- Joined: 27 Sep 2022, 15:08
- Gender: Male
Re: Martin Walsh has provided an update 24/3.
Actually there's 3 things a company can do with its profits. They can re invest in the company, Save the profits or pay shareholders dividends. So no it's not the whole point. Also Royal mail is a public companyWalter sobchak wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 16:15
That’s the whole point of a private company to pay shareholders the profits.
-
CRIBMAD
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 835
- Joined: 11 Oct 2016, 13:38
- Gender: Male
Re: Martin Walsh has provided an update 24/3.
deal is done ! 9% rise lump sum between 2 - 3 k u heard it here
-
FilthyBloke
- Posts: 685
- Joined: 03 Jun 2018, 11:41
- Gender: Male
Re: Martin Walsh has provided an update 24/3.
But if you’re walking 12 miles a day it doesn’t matter what your hourly rate is regarding your health? It’s not like your body knows how much money you are earning.needadvice wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 17:30If we don't get an acceptable agreement the job will not be worthy. It really depends what this job does to your health. If you are walking 12 miles a day for little more than minimum wage then that is in my opinion an act of self harm and you will regret it in your 50's and beyondAcca Dacca wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 17:10Doing our job as it is for not much more than minimum wage is a line in the sand for many nevermind any of the changesrambo1 wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 17:01Solidarity BS. So they would rather the 100,000 or so colleagues they have, loose a job many of them NEED in whatever incarnation they come up with, than RM getting their way?
As long as you still have a finish time the job ain't gonna change drastically. How can it?
When I started our hourly rate was about £4 maybe even £5 more than minimum wage which reflected the physical nature of the job out in the elements
Now minimum wage has caught up big time and you add in the cost of living with inflation and you have many people questioning if this is a job worth keeping
If 12 miles is too much then it’s too much.
-
toonshola
- Posts: 915
- Joined: 29 Jul 2011, 16:31
- Gender: Male
-
zz666
- Posts: 223
- Joined: 22 Jul 2016, 20:08
- Gender: Male
Re: Martin Walsh has provided an update 24/3.
Will gls go under as well?
-
Cucumber
- Posts: 1052
- Joined: 09 Dec 2018, 10:24
- Gender: Female
-
Rik
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 02 Jun 2016, 15:22
- Gender: Male
Re: Martin Walsh has provided an update 24/3.
To go insolvent then your liabilities must outweigh your assets, the shareholding also includes GLS so I can't see how administration is possible looking at the balance sheet.
More likely that GLS is sold off.
The company may be cash strapped but that's not the same as being insolvent.
More likely that GLS is sold off.
The company may be cash strapped but that's not the same as being insolvent.