How can you call it a compromise when they bring forward the age 65 retiring age forward 2 more years than they orginally said they would.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
ROYAL MAIL PENSION PLAN - THE COMPANY'S DECISION
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72478
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
ROYAL MAIL PENSION PLAN - THE COMPANY'S DECISION
Looks like another Royal Mail form of consultation when they ask for views and then either highlight the ones that tend to agree with them, or ignore them totally. At least that's the impression I get reading their letter.
How can you call it a compromise when they bring forward the age 65 retiring age forward 2 more years than they orginally said they would.
How can you call it a compromise when they bring forward the age 65 retiring age forward 2 more years than they orginally said they would.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
POSTMAN
- SITE ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 32669
- Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
- Gender: Male
Yeah i couldn't figure that bit out!!bring forward the age 65 retiring age forward 2 more years than they orginally said they would
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
-
DGP1
- Posts: 15551
- Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
- Gender: Male
- Location: Terminus
-
BELIAL
- Posts: 6758
- Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
- Gender: Female
- Location: Nowhere
-
k979aaa
- Posts: 12578
- Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
- Gender: Male
- Location: THE NORTH
Re: ROYAL MAIL PENSION PLAN - THE COMPANY'S DECISION
The cousultaton was a sham but royalmail have used comment's to their own ends and and will continue to do so!. FOR ONE IS NOT DEFINDED BY HIS WORDS BUT BY HIS ACTIONS AND WE MUST ONE AND ALL ACT NOW TO DEFEND OUR FUTURE AFTER WORK!.TrueBlueTerrier wrote:Looks like another Royal Mail form of consultation when they ask for views and then either highlight the ones that tend to agree with them, or ignore them totally. At least that's the impression I get reading their letter.
How can you call it a compromise when they bring forward the age 65 retiring age forward 2 more years than they orginally said they would.
-
Phantom
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: 27 Dec 2007, 18:17
- Gender: Female
- Location: New York
We need industrial action from all levels now, its time to stop pissing about and show this stupid company and the government how destructive they are being.
All new employees must have worked for 12 months before they can pay in? what on a 20hr contract???, can they afford it??? i don't think so, most new starters will leave within 12 months and so will never pay in
and this is infact another stupid ploy by this management to change the pension.
Low pay contracts / increase in staff turnover = not enough money going in to the pension pot!!!
!!! EVERYBODY OUT !!!
:cfo :lfo
All new employees must have worked for 12 months before they can pay in? what on a 20hr contract???, can they afford it??? i don't think so, most new starters will leave within 12 months and so will never pay in
and this is infact another stupid ploy by this management to change the pension.
Low pay contracts / increase in staff turnover = not enough money going in to the pension pot!!!
!!! EVERYBODY OUT !!!
:cfo :lfo
-
jinglejangle
- Posts: 43
- Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 21:48
ever since we got shafted with that sxxx deal from the CWU most posties have lost faith in the CWU as a rule.im just working from day to day rather than enjoying the crack as it was years ago.What fight can you put up when you have fellow workers coming in early unpaid, going over and not booking and rushing around like the world is gonna end.With workers like that it doesnt take RM much to realise they can take back the one good thing RM provides........the pension.
Shame
Shame
-
meoldcocker
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 16 Oct 2007, 14:53