So what parameters do you envisage this 'case by case' scenario? and how would that not be descrimanation?
Discrimination in the workplace is not illegal unless that discrimination is based on a protected characteristic defined in law (eg race, sex, age pregnancy, disability). They could, if they wanted, choose to discriminate against every employee whose name begins with the letter J and there would be nothing illegal about that.
Sickness absence record (if not connected to a disability) and performance or disciplinary issues are often used as criteria by businesses making employees redundant.
9 months no one will take that, if they want rid of people they will need to pay us! listen the company has plenty of money i reckon, plead skint but deepdown they could pay 2 years if they want, instead trying to be measley 9 months is a joke, no one will go unless its at least 12 months , modest would be 18 months
So what parameters do you envisage this 'case by case' scenario? and how would that not be descrimanation?
Discrimination in the workplace is not illegal unless that discrimination is based on a protected characteristic defined in law (eg race, sex, age pregnancy, disability). They could, if they wanted, choose to discriminate against every employee whose name begins with the letter J and there would be nothing illegal about that.
Sickness absence record (if not connected to a disability) and performance or disciplinary issues are often used as criteria by businesses making employees redundant.
In what way, the more you're sick, the better to get rid of. Or a good sickness record would be prioritized? You didn't say which.
9 months no one will take that, if they want rid of people they will need to pay us! listen the company has plenty of money i reckon, plead skint but deepdown they could pay 2 years if they want, instead trying to be measley 9 months is a joke, no one will go unless its at least 12 months , modest would be 18 months
If you were going anyway, and a lot are planning it, then anything would be a bonus. I think you'll find 5000 would say thank you very much for £8k -£10k and skip out the office whistling a tune. I know I would!
I work in processing and doubt many would go for 9 months money. Obviously it's a walk in the park compared to delivery. Lots of our work has gone to the super hubs so they will be wanting people to go come February. They will have to make it compulsory as I along with most others will happily plod along for a few more years.
So what parameters do you envisage this 'case by case' scenario? and how would that not be descrimanation?
Discrimination in the workplace is not illegal unless that discrimination is based on a protected characteristic defined in law (eg race, sex, age pregnancy, disability). They could, if they wanted, choose to discriminate against every employee whose name begins with the letter J and there would be nothing illegal about that.
Sickness absence record (if not connected to a disability) and performance or disciplinary issues are often used as criteria by businesses making employees redundant.
In what way, the more you're sick, the better to get rid of. Or a good sickness record would be prioritized? You didn't say which.
What do you think?
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
HAVE WE GOT AN AGREEMENT IN BLACK AND WHITE FOR ENHANCED REDUNDANCY TERMS IF WE HAVE SURELY ROYAL MAIL ARE BREAKING THE LAW LETS TAKE THEM TO COURT FOR A CHANGE
All agreements cancelled since we went on strike,they ran rings around us.
its no as simple as say ill take 8 grand, theres not many jobs around now, seem to be a lot advertised but not a lot get back to you, so 9 months is a bit of an insult lucky if it will get you a couple of trips to the supermarket for a monthly shop at this rate, and an expensive mot and car insurance, there goes ur 8K
HAVE WE GOT AN AGREEMENT IN BLACK AND WHITE FOR ENHANCED REDUNDANCY TERMS IF WE HAVE SURELY ROYAL MAIL ARE BREAKING THE LAW LETS TAKE THEM TO COURT FOR A CHANGE
MTSF 2010(1).pdf
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
So what parameters do you envisage this 'case by case' scenario? and how would that not be descrimanation?
Discrimination in the workplace is not illegal unless that discrimination is based on a protected characteristic defined in law (eg race, sex, age pregnancy, disability). They could, if they wanted, choose to discriminate against every employee whose name begins with the letter J and there would be nothing illegal about that.
Sickness absence record (if not connected to a disability) and performance or disciplinary issues are often used as criteria by businesses making employees redundant.
In what way, the more you're sick, the better to get rid of. Or a good sickness record would be prioritized? You didn't say which.
What do you think?
Probably get penalised for being good, like most things in life. Got savings? You'll pay for nursing home, spent up? You'll get it free.
