We are pretty much on the same page, except I am voting yes. Reluctantly but it has been a yes for me since the deal was announced as I literally see it as the best of two bad options.Nickvilla20 wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 21:29It seems I’m coming across liking the deal and defending the union but I’m really not.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 21:16Exactly. Which is why I ask the No voters what they hope to achieve. I can understand people voting yes. I can’t with the No voters.Nickvilla20 wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 21:10A no vote will just mean they implement the deal regardless and the union will be completely smashed to pieces if the leaving threats are true.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 19:26I’m not defending the union though. I am saying that the deal presented is clearly the best they could manage. Not having a plan B sounds like the perfect time to vote for plan A as it is either that or, well what? Nobody seems to offer an explanation as to what they hope to achieve with a no vote.postslippete wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 18:57Come on Lou. The CWU have shown themselves up time and again. From a no strings pay rise ballot to this deal on the table. They have messed up on ballots and even the last strike that they called off this year due to the technicality was just plain embarrassing. The CWUs business plan presented to Royal Mail before Xmas was laughable.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 17:41Given how many people seem to be unhappy with the deal, and claiming they are leaving the union (which I highly doubt) it doesn’t seem likely to save their skin by endorsing the deal. Maybe the facts are that the deal being offered is actually the best option, considering the alternative is….well what is the alternative? Nobody is going to strike when there is nothing to gain. The union are more in tune with the company finances than we are.
We are supposed to be stronger by being in a union but the fact that the leadership don't even have a plan B is exactly the reason why they get outmanoeuvred at every turn by Royal Mail.
I’m seeing thing’s realistically as soon as the company got very aggressive we knew we were facing heavy concessions. The problem was the union promised much and have delivered little and now the huge support and losses of wages have achieved barely anything.
I’m still undecided how to vote I may just end up abstaining it’s not a good deal but it’s probably the best we are going to get.
Just look at what the NHS unions have accepted and now they are imposing that pay rise on the nurses who are still striking and that’s exactly what Royal Mail will do to it.
It really seems Royal Mail’s divide and conquer strategy has paid off.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
If the agreement ballot comes back as a NO
-
LouBarlow
- Posts: 4682
- Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56
Re: If the agreement ballot comes back as a NO
-
guardianangel
- Posts: 1782
- Joined: 21 Feb 2020, 19:40
- Gender: Male
Re: If the agreement ballot comes back as a NO
Im still voting NO !!! i couldn't possibly vote on a deal that tears up our hard fought T's and C's ,sick,IHR,seasonal hours is definitely red lines ,once they start they will chip away year after year.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 17:41Given how many people seem to be unhappy with the deal, and claiming they are leaving the union (which I highly doubt) it doesn’t seem likely to save their skin by endorsing the deal. Maybe the facts are that the deal being offered is actually the best option, considering the alternative is….well what is the alternative? Nobody is going to strike when there is nothing to gain. The union are more in tune with the company finances than we are.guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:44To save their own skin after royal mail were threatening to defund them and move them out of the workplace,in simple terms self preservation,they bottled it and now they expect us to pay ,well i won't except it and will vote NO !!!!LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:37If there were more concessions to be made, or more left on the table for us, why do you honestly think the union agreed to the deal put before us, rather than call strike action?guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:27Striking is our leverage,a company will never move forward while its workforce are striking,i might be wrong but at the moment the Tories haven't made it illegal,RM can carry on in their own direction but it will end up costing them a fortune.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 06:22I didn’t say I would be surprised if it is a no. I said there will be no more strikes. If this deal is voted out we will continue with change being brought in without union involvement all the while continuing on the same stagnant wage we have now. If there is no agreement RM can bring in all the changes they want and we will have no leverage left.guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 05:49I dont know what white flag office you work in but over 100 posties in mine are voting NO !!! i think you might have a surprise.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 05:07There will be no strikes. The union have settled on this deal for a reason. There is no more to be squeezed out of the company right now plus there is next to no appetite to lose more money on this dispute, barring from some extremists on here, who imagine that a 15% back-dated pay-rise and a return to 12 o’clock finishes is a possibility.guardianangel wrote: ↑01 May 2023, 17:48We carry on striking,shares will plummet,they can impose whatever they like but with strikes on going the pressure will always be on them ,i really dont understand some of the defeatist attitude on here,i'll be voting NO !!! but if for some unbelievable reason there is a yes vote i'll be leaving the union or what really is the point of being a member,they cant stop you from being sacked we have seen that and if they lose you t's and c's and get you a pay cut whats the point of paying for something you are not getting,its like paying for an insurance that never pays out.All those years fighting for benefits for it to be given away so cheaply.
-
LouBarlow
- Posts: 4682
- Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56
Re: If the agreement ballot comes back as a NO
What do you think a no vote will get you? All of those changes will come in anyway without an agreement and then some. No union involvement either.guardianangel wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 05:45Im still voting NO !!! i couldn't possibly vote on a deal that tears up our hard fought T's and C's ,sick,IHR,seasonal hours is definitely red lines ,once they start they will chip away year after year.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 17:41Given how many people seem to be unhappy with the deal, and claiming they are leaving the union (which I highly doubt) it doesn’t seem likely to save their skin by endorsing the deal. Maybe the facts are that the deal being offered is actually the best option, considering the alternative is….well what is the alternative? Nobody is going to strike when there is nothing to gain. The union are more in tune with the company finances than we are.guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:44To save their own skin after royal mail were threatening to defund them and move them out of the workplace,in simple terms self preservation,they bottled it and now they expect us to pay ,well i won't except it and will vote NO !!!!LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:37If there were more concessions to be made, or more left on the table for us, why do you honestly think the union agreed to the deal put before us, rather than call strike action?guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:27Striking is our leverage,a company will never move forward while its workforce are striking,i might be wrong but at the moment the Tories haven't made it illegal,RM can carry on in their own direction but it will end up costing them a fortune.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 06:22I didn’t say I would be surprised if it is a no. I said there will be no more strikes. If this deal is voted out we will continue with change being brought in without union involvement all the while continuing on the same stagnant wage we have now. If there is no agreement RM can bring in all the changes they want and we will have no leverage left.guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 05:49I dont know what white flag office you work in but over 100 posties in mine are voting NO !!! i think you might have a surprise.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 05:07There will be no strikes. The union have settled on this deal for a reason. There is no more to be squeezed out of the company right now plus there is next to no appetite to lose more money on this dispute, barring from some extremists on here, who imagine that a 15% back-dated pay-rise and a return to 12 o’clock finishes is a possibility.guardianangel wrote: ↑01 May 2023, 17:48We carry on striking,shares will plummet,they can impose whatever they like but with strikes on going the pressure will always be on them ,i really dont understand some of the defeatist attitude on here,i'll be voting NO !!! but if for some unbelievable reason there is a yes vote i'll be leaving the union or what really is the point of being a member,they cant stop you from being sacked we have seen that and if they lose you t's and c's and get you a pay cut whats the point of paying for something you are not getting,its like paying for an insurance that never pays out.All those years fighting for benefits for it to be given away so cheaply.
-
Burghboy
- Posts: 224
- Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 09:19
- Gender: Male
Re: If the agreement ballot comes back as a NO
You don’t know that and are speculating…LouBarlow wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 06:18What do you think a no vote will get you? All of those changes will come in anyway without an agreement and then some. No union involvement either.guardianangel wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 05:45Im still voting NO !!! i couldn't possibly vote on a deal that tears up our hard fought T's and C's ,sick,IHR,seasonal hours is definitely red lines ,once they start they will chip away year after year.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 17:41Given how many people seem to be unhappy with the deal, and claiming they are leaving the union (which I highly doubt) it doesn’t seem likely to save their skin by endorsing the deal. Maybe the facts are that the deal being offered is actually the best option, considering the alternative is….well what is the alternative? Nobody is going to strike when there is nothing to gain. The union are more in tune with the company finances than we are.guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:44To save their own skin after royal mail were threatening to defund them and move them out of the workplace,in simple terms self preservation,they bottled it and now they expect us to pay ,well i won't except it and will vote NO !!!!LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:37If there were more concessions to be made, or more left on the table for us, why do you honestly think the union agreed to the deal put before us, rather than call strike action?guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:27Striking is our leverage,a company will never move forward while its workforce are striking,i might be wrong but at the moment the Tories haven't made it illegal,RM can carry on in their own direction but it will end up costing them a fortune.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 06:22I didn’t say I would be surprised if it is a no. I said there will be no more strikes. If this deal is voted out we will continue with change being brought in without union involvement all the while continuing on the same stagnant wage we have now. If there is no agreement RM can bring in all the changes they want and we will have no leverage left.guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 05:49I dont know what white flag office you work in but over 100 posties in mine are voting NO !!! i think you might have a surprise.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 05:07There will be no strikes. The union have settled on this deal for a reason. There is no more to be squeezed out of the company right now plus there is next to no appetite to lose more money on this dispute, barring from some extremists on here, who imagine that a 15% back-dated pay-rise and a return to 12 o’clock finishes is a possibility.guardianangel wrote: ↑01 May 2023, 17:48We carry on striking,shares will plummet,they can impose whatever they like but with strikes on going the pressure will always be on them ,i really dont understand some of the defeatist attitude on here,i'll be voting NO !!! but if for some unbelievable reason there is a yes vote i'll be leaving the union or what really is the point of being a member,they cant stop you from being sacked we have seen that and if they lose you t's and c's and get you a pay cut whats the point of paying for something you are not getting,its like paying for an insurance that never pays out.All those years fighting for benefits for it to be given away so cheaply.
-
freespeech
- MDEC
- Posts: 762
- Joined: 28 Jun 2007, 16:35
Re: If the agreement ballot comes back as a NO
What do you think a no vote will get you? All of those changes will come in anyway without an agreement and then some. No union involvement either.
[/quote]
You don’t know that and are speculating…
[/quote]
RM and the CWU have collective bargaining. The CWU NEC have already endorsed the deal. RM do not need the CWU membership to endorse it, that is just internal CWU Politics. The unknown will be whether RM proceed on the basis of a yes vote or not.
[/quote]
You don’t know that and are speculating…
[/quote]
RM and the CWU have collective bargaining. The CWU NEC have already endorsed the deal. RM do not need the CWU membership to endorse it, that is just internal CWU Politics. The unknown will be whether RM proceed on the basis of a yes vote or not.
-
guardianangel
- Posts: 1782
- Joined: 21 Feb 2020, 19:40
- Gender: Male
Re: If the agreement ballot comes back as a NO
Well said ,people on hear are listening to much to what Royal Mail and the CWU say,no one knows whats going to happen, if you don't fight and take a chance we will nev er know what is possible,and if as people say they will bring it in anyway we have nothing to lose.Burghboy wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 06:57You don’t know that and are speculating…LouBarlow wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 06:18What do you think a no vote will get you? All of those changes will come in anyway without an agreement and then some. No union involvement either.guardianangel wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 05:45Im still voting NO !!! i couldn't possibly vote on a deal that tears up our hard fought T's and C's ,sick,IHR,seasonal hours is definitely red lines ,once they start they will chip away year after year.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 17:41Given how many people seem to be unhappy with the deal, and claiming they are leaving the union (which I highly doubt) it doesn’t seem likely to save their skin by endorsing the deal. Maybe the facts are that the deal being offered is actually the best option, considering the alternative is….well what is the alternative? Nobody is going to strike when there is nothing to gain. The union are more in tune with the company finances than we are.guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:44To save their own skin after royal mail were threatening to defund them and move them out of the workplace,in simple terms self preservation,they bottled it and now they expect us to pay ,well i won't except it and will vote NO !!!!LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:37If there were more concessions to be made, or more left on the table for us, why do you honestly think the union agreed to the deal put before us, rather than call strike action?guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:27Striking is our leverage,a company will never move forward while its workforce are striking,i might be wrong but at the moment the Tories haven't made it illegal,RM can carry on in their own direction but it will end up costing them a fortune.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 06:22I didn’t say I would be surprised if it is a no. I said there will be no more strikes. If this deal is voted out we will continue with change being brought in without union involvement all the while continuing on the same stagnant wage we have now. If there is no agreement RM can bring in all the changes they want and we will have no leverage left.guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 05:49I dont know what white flag office you work in but over 100 posties in mine are voting NO !!! i think you might have a surprise.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 05:07There will be no strikes. The union have settled on this deal for a reason. There is no more to be squeezed out of the company right now plus there is next to no appetite to lose more money on this dispute, barring from some extremists on here, who imagine that a 15% back-dated pay-rise and a return to 12 o’clock finishes is a possibility.guardianangel wrote: ↑01 May 2023, 17:48We carry on striking,shares will plummet,they can impose whatever they like but with strikes on going the pressure will always be on them ,i really dont understand some of the defeatist attitude on here,i'll be voting NO !!! but if for some unbelievable reason there is a yes vote i'll be leaving the union or what really is the point of being a member,they cant stop you from being sacked we have seen that and if they lose you t's and c's and get you a pay cut whats the point of paying for something you are not getting,its like paying for an insurance that never pays out.All those years fighting for benefits for it to be given away so cheaply.
-
LouBarlow
- Posts: 4682
- Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56
Re: If the agreement ballot comes back as a NO
It isn’t speculating. If the deal isn’t accepted, then there is no agreement and RM can plough on regardless. All previous agreements were torn up when we took strike action, which is why all this executive action has been rammed through. Without a deal we will have all these changes brought in and worse as they will not be tied to any agreement. Voting no isn’t ‘having a go’ it is literally going to make your working life even worse, even if you have a job at the end of it.Burghboy wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 06:57You don’t know that and are speculating…LouBarlow wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 06:18What do you think a no vote will get you? All of those changes will come in anyway without an agreement and then some. No union involvement either.guardianangel wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 05:45Im still voting NO !!! i couldn't possibly vote on a deal that tears up our hard fought T's and C's ,sick,IHR,seasonal hours is definitely red lines ,once they start they will chip away year after year.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 17:41Given how many people seem to be unhappy with the deal, and claiming they are leaving the union (which I highly doubt) it doesn’t seem likely to save their skin by endorsing the deal. Maybe the facts are that the deal being offered is actually the best option, considering the alternative is….well what is the alternative? Nobody is going to strike when there is nothing to gain. The union are more in tune with the company finances than we are.guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:44To save their own skin after royal mail were threatening to defund them and move them out of the workplace,in simple terms self preservation,they bottled it and now they expect us to pay ,well i won't except it and will vote NO !!!!LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:37If there were more concessions to be made, or more left on the table for us, why do you honestly think the union agreed to the deal put before us, rather than call strike action?guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:27Striking is our leverage,a company will never move forward while its workforce are striking,i might be wrong but at the moment the Tories haven't made it illegal,RM can carry on in their own direction but it will end up costing them a fortune.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 06:22I didn’t say I would be surprised if it is a no. I said there will be no more strikes. If this deal is voted out we will continue with change being brought in without union involvement all the while continuing on the same stagnant wage we have now. If there is no agreement RM can bring in all the changes they want and we will have no leverage left.guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 05:49I dont know what white flag office you work in but over 100 posties in mine are voting NO !!! i think you might have a surprise.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 05:07There will be no strikes. The union have settled on this deal for a reason. There is no more to be squeezed out of the company right now plus there is next to no appetite to lose more money on this dispute, barring from some extremists on here, who imagine that a 15% back-dated pay-rise and a return to 12 o’clock finishes is a possibility.guardianangel wrote: ↑01 May 2023, 17:48We carry on striking,shares will plummet,they can impose whatever they like but with strikes on going the pressure will always be on them ,i really dont understand some of the defeatist attitude on here,i'll be voting NO !!! but if for some unbelievable reason there is a yes vote i'll be leaving the union or what really is the point of being a member,they cant stop you from being sacked we have seen that and if they lose you t's and c's and get you a pay cut whats the point of paying for something you are not getting,its like paying for an insurance that never pays out.All those years fighting for benefits for it to be given away so cheaply.
-
77SAMPOST77
- PARCELFORCE
- Posts: 365
- Joined: 20 Sep 2022, 15:49
- Gender: Male
Re: If the agreement ballot comes back as a NO
You do not know whats going to happen , so are are speculating yourself .LouBarlow wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 16:56It isn’t speculating. If the deal isn’t accepted, then there is no agreement and RM can plough on regardless. All previous agreements were torn up when we took strike action, which is why all this executive action has been rammed through. Without a deal we will have all these changes brought in and worse as they will not be tied to any agreement. Voting no isn’t ‘having a go’ it is literally going to make your working life even worse, even if you have a job at the end of it.Burghboy wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 06:57You don’t know that and are speculating…LouBarlow wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 06:18What do you think a no vote will get you? All of those changes will come in anyway without an agreement and then some. No union involvement either.guardianangel wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 05:45Im still voting NO !!! i couldn't possibly vote on a deal that tears up our hard fought T's and C's ,sick,IHR,seasonal hours is definitely red lines ,once they start they will chip away year after year.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 17:41Given how many people seem to be unhappy with the deal, and claiming they are leaving the union (which I highly doubt) it doesn’t seem likely to save their skin by endorsing the deal. Maybe the facts are that the deal being offered is actually the best option, considering the alternative is….well what is the alternative? Nobody is going to strike when there is nothing to gain. The union are more in tune with the company finances than we are.guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:44To save their own skin after royal mail were threatening to defund them and move them out of the workplace,in simple terms self preservation,they bottled it and now they expect us to pay ,well i won't except it and will vote NO !!!!LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:37If there were more concessions to be made, or more left on the table for us, why do you honestly think the union agreed to the deal put before us, rather than call strike action?guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:27Striking is our leverage,a company will never move forward while its workforce are striking,i might be wrong but at the moment the Tories haven't made it illegal,RM can carry on in their own direction but it will end up costing them a fortune.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 06:22I didn’t say I would be surprised if it is a no. I said there will be no more strikes. If this deal is voted out we will continue with change being brought in without union involvement all the while continuing on the same stagnant wage we have now. If there is no agreement RM can bring in all the changes they want and we will have no leverage left.guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 05:49I dont know what white flag office you work in but over 100 posties in mine are voting NO !!! i think you might have a surprise.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 05:07There will be no strikes. The union have settled on this deal for a reason. There is no more to be squeezed out of the company right now plus there is next to no appetite to lose more money on this dispute, barring from some extremists on here, who imagine that a 15% back-dated pay-rise and a return to 12 o’clock finishes is a possibility.guardianangel wrote: ↑01 May 2023, 17:48We carry on striking,shares will plummet,they can impose whatever they like but with strikes on going the pressure will always be on them ,i really dont understand some of the defeatist attitude on here,i'll be voting NO !!! but if for some unbelievable reason there is a yes vote i'll be leaving the union or what really is the point of being a member,they cant stop you from being sacked we have seen that and if they lose you t's and c's and get you a pay cut whats the point of paying for something you are not getting,its like paying for an insurance that never pays out.All those years fighting for benefits for it to be given away so cheaply.
sick of all the gloom merchants who think voting no is the end of the world .
-
Chitchat
- Posts: 361
- Joined: 30 Jan 2013, 15:18
- Gender: Male
Re: If the agreement ballot comes back as a NO
RM and the CWU have collective bargaining. The CWU NEC have already endorsed the deal. RM do not need the CWU membership to endorse it, that is just internal CWU Politics. The unknown will be whether RM proceed on the basis of a yes vote or not.
[/quote]
If this is true? We may as well all vote no then! If the deal is going in regardless of this so called "internal CWU politics" at least we can let the people at the top know exactly where the workforce stand!
[/quote]
If this is true? We may as well all vote no then! If the deal is going in regardless of this so called "internal CWU politics" at least we can let the people at the top know exactly where the workforce stand!
-
LouBarlow
- Posts: 4682
- Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56
Re: If the agreement ballot comes back as a NO
I know that if the deal isn’t agreed by the members, there is no agreement. It isn’t complicated. It is how voting on something works. And no, it won’t be the end of the world, but you will be turning down a pay rise and will give RM full power to bring in any changes they want. I’m sorry the truth is gloomy.77SAMPOST77 wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 17:10You do not know whats going to happen , so are are speculating yourself .LouBarlow wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 16:56It isn’t speculating. If the deal isn’t accepted, then there is no agreement and RM can plough on regardless. All previous agreements were torn up when we took strike action, which is why all this executive action has been rammed through. Without a deal we will have all these changes brought in and worse as they will not be tied to any agreement. Voting no isn’t ‘having a go’ it is literally going to make your working life even worse, even if you have a job at the end of it.Burghboy wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 06:57You don’t know that and are speculating…LouBarlow wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 06:18What do you think a no vote will get you? All of those changes will come in anyway without an agreement and then some. No union involvement either.guardianangel wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 05:45Im still voting NO !!! i couldn't possibly vote on a deal that tears up our hard fought T's and C's ,sick,IHR,seasonal hours is definitely red lines ,once they start they will chip away year after year.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 17:41Given how many people seem to be unhappy with the deal, and claiming they are leaving the union (which I highly doubt) it doesn’t seem likely to save their skin by endorsing the deal. Maybe the facts are that the deal being offered is actually the best option, considering the alternative is….well what is the alternative? Nobody is going to strike when there is nothing to gain. The union are more in tune with the company finances than we are.guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:44To save their own skin after royal mail were threatening to defund them and move them out of the workplace,in simple terms self preservation,they bottled it and now they expect us to pay ,well i won't except it and will vote NO !!!!LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:37If there were more concessions to be made, or more left on the table for us, why do you honestly think the union agreed to the deal put before us, rather than call strike action?guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:27Striking is our leverage,a company will never move forward while its workforce are striking,i might be wrong but at the moment the Tories haven't made it illegal,RM can carry on in their own direction but it will end up costing them a fortune.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 06:22I didn’t say I would be surprised if it is a no. I said there will be no more strikes. If this deal is voted out we will continue with change being brought in without union involvement all the while continuing on the same stagnant wage we have now. If there is no agreement RM can bring in all the changes they want and we will have no leverage left.guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 05:49I dont know what white flag office you work in but over 100 posties in mine are voting NO !!! i think you might have a surprise.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 05:07There will be no strikes. The union have settled on this deal for a reason. There is no more to be squeezed out of the company right now plus there is next to no appetite to lose more money on this dispute, barring from some extremists on here, who imagine that a 15% back-dated pay-rise and a return to 12 o’clock finishes is a possibility.guardianangel wrote: ↑01 May 2023, 17:48We carry on striking,shares will plummet,they can impose whatever they like but with strikes on going the pressure will always be on them ,i really dont understand some of the defeatist attitude on here,i'll be voting NO !!! but if for some unbelievable reason there is a yes vote i'll be leaving the union or what really is the point of being a member,they cant stop you from being sacked we have seen that and if they lose you t's and c's and get you a pay cut whats the point of paying for something you are not getting,its like paying for an insurance that never pays out.All those years fighting for benefits for it to be given away so cheaply.
sick of all the gloom merchants who think voting no is the end of the world .
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 11990
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
-
postslippete
- Posts: 4099
- Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
- Gender: Male
Re: If the agreement ballot comes back as a NO
SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 19:55My gut feeling is that they're going to bring in whatever changes they want by EA anyway whether we vote yes or no
That's quite true. Accepting the deal does not guarantee that Royal Mail won’t be broken up and sold off to rivals.
Thankfully we will have a two-tier workforce on worse conditions that we will be working alongside so that the bosses will use to undercut us. Its actually a giant step towards the gig economy.
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.
-
ted_e_bear
- Posts: 3932
- Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
- Gender: Male
Re: If the agreement ballot comes back as a NO
If this is a competition to quote the longest thread possible and add nothing here's my entry.LouBarlow wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 19:40I know that if the deal isn’t agreed by the members, there is no agreement. It isn’t complicated. It is how voting on something works. And no, it won’t be the end of the world, but you will be turning down a pay rise and will give RM full power to bring in any changes they want. I’m sorry the truth is gloomy.77SAMPOST77 wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 17:10You do not know whats going to happen , so are are speculating yourself .LouBarlow wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 16:56It isn’t speculating. If the deal isn’t accepted, then there is no agreement and RM can plough on regardless. All previous agreements were torn up when we took strike action, which is why all this executive action has been rammed through. Without a deal we will have all these changes brought in and worse as they will not be tied to any agreement. Voting no isn’t ‘having a go’ it is literally going to make your working life even worse, even if you have a job at the end of it.Burghboy wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 06:57You don’t know that and are speculating…LouBarlow wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 06:18What do you think a no vote will get you? All of those changes will come in anyway without an agreement and then some. No union involvement either.guardianangel wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 05:45Im still voting NO !!! i couldn't possibly vote on a deal that tears up our hard fought T's and C's ,sick,IHR,seasonal hours is definitely red lines ,once they start they will chip away year after year.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 17:41Given how many people seem to be unhappy with the deal, and claiming they are leaving the union (which I highly doubt) it doesn’t seem likely to save their skin by endorsing the deal. Maybe the facts are that the deal being offered is actually the best option, considering the alternative is….well what is the alternative? Nobody is going to strike when there is nothing to gain. The union are more in tune with the company finances than we are.guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:44To save their own skin after royal mail were threatening to defund them and move them out of the workplace,in simple terms self preservation,they bottled it and now they expect us to pay ,well i won't except it and will vote NO !!!!LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:37If there were more concessions to be made, or more left on the table for us, why do you honestly think the union agreed to the deal put before us, rather than call strike action?guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:27Striking is our leverage,a company will never move forward while its workforce are striking,i might be wrong but at the moment the Tories haven't made it illegal,RM can carry on in their own direction but it will end up costing them a fortune.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 06:22I didn’t say I would be surprised if it is a no. I said there will be no more strikes. If this deal is voted out we will continue with change being brought in without union involvement all the while continuing on the same stagnant wage we have now. If there is no agreement RM can bring in all the changes they want and we will have no leverage left.guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 05:49I dont know what white flag office you work in but over 100 posties in mine are voting NO !!! i think you might have a surprise.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 05:07There will be no strikes. The union have settled on this deal for a reason. There is no more to be squeezed out of the company right now plus there is next to no appetite to lose more money on this dispute, barring from some extremists on here, who imagine that a 15% back-dated pay-rise and a return to 12 o’clock finishes is a possibility.guardianangel wrote: ↑01 May 2023, 17:48We carry on striking,shares will plummet,they can impose whatever they like but with strikes on going the pressure will always be on them ,i really dont understand some of the defeatist attitude on here,i'll be voting NO !!! but if for some unbelievable reason there is a yes vote i'll be leaving the union or what really is the point of being a member,they cant stop you from being sacked we have seen that and if they lose you t's and c's and get you a pay cut whats the point of paying for something you are not getting,its like paying for an insurance that never pays out.All those years fighting for benefits for it to be given away so cheaply.
sick of all the gloom merchants who think voting no is the end of the world .
-
postslippete
- Posts: 4099
- Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
- Gender: Male
Re: If the agreement ballot comes back as a NO
ted_e_bear wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 20:19If this is a competition to quote the longest thread possible and add nothing here's my entry.LouBarlow wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 19:40I know that if the deal isn’t agreed by the members, there is no agreement. It isn’t complicated. It is how voting on something works. And no, it won’t be the end of the world, but you will be turning down a pay rise and will give RM full power to bring in any changes they want. I’m sorry the truth is gloomy.77SAMPOST77 wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 17:10You do not know whats going to happen , so are are speculating yourself .LouBarlow wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 16:56It isn’t speculating. If the deal isn’t accepted, then there is no agreement and RM can plough on regardless. All previous agreements were torn up when we took strike action, which is why all this executive action has been rammed through. Without a deal we will have all these changes brought in and worse as they will not be tied to any agreement. Voting no isn’t ‘having a go’ it is literally going to make your working life even worse, even if you have a job at the end of it.Burghboy wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 06:57You don’t know that and are speculating…LouBarlow wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 06:18What do you think a no vote will get you? All of those changes will come in anyway without an agreement and then some. No union involvement either.guardianangel wrote: ↑03 May 2023, 05:45Im still voting NO !!! i couldn't possibly vote on a deal that tears up our hard fought T's and C's ,sick,IHR,seasonal hours is definitely red lines ,once they start they will chip away year after year.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 17:41Given how many people seem to be unhappy with the deal, and claiming they are leaving the union (which I highly doubt) it doesn’t seem likely to save their skin by endorsing the deal. Maybe the facts are that the deal being offered is actually the best option, considering the alternative is….well what is the alternative? Nobody is going to strike when there is nothing to gain. The union are more in tune with the company finances than we are.guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:44To save their own skin after royal mail were threatening to defund them and move them out of the workplace,in simple terms self preservation,they bottled it and now they expect us to pay ,well i won't except it and will vote NO !!!!LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:37If there were more concessions to be made, or more left on the table for us, why do you honestly think the union agreed to the deal put before us, rather than call strike action?guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 14:27Striking is our leverage,a company will never move forward while its workforce are striking,i might be wrong but at the moment the Tories haven't made it illegal,RM can carry on in their own direction but it will end up costing them a fortune.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 06:22I didn’t say I would be surprised if it is a no. I said there will be no more strikes. If this deal is voted out we will continue with change being brought in without union involvement all the while continuing on the same stagnant wage we have now. If there is no agreement RM can bring in all the changes they want and we will have no leverage left.guardianangel wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 05:49I dont know what white flag office you work in but over 100 posties in mine are voting NO !!! i think you might have a surprise.LouBarlow wrote: ↑02 May 2023, 05:07There will be no strikes. The union have settled on this deal for a reason. There is no more to be squeezed out of the company right now plus there is next to no appetite to lose more money on this dispute, barring from some extremists on here, who imagine that a 15% back-dated pay-rise and a return to 12 o’clock finishes is a possibility.guardianangel wrote: ↑01 May 2023, 17:48We carry on striking,shares will plummet,they can impose whatever they like but with strikes on going the pressure will always be on them ,i really dont understand some of the defeatist attitude on here,i'll be voting NO !!! but if for some unbelievable reason there is a yes vote i'll be leaving the union or what really is the point of being a member,they cant stop you from being sacked we have seen that and if they lose you t's and c's and get you a pay cut whats the point of paying for something you are not getting,its like paying for an insurance that never pays out.All those years fighting for benefits for it to be given away so cheaply.
sick of all the gloom merchants who think voting no is the end of the world .
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.