ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

ALL IS NOT LOST

Royal Mail pension news and discussion.Please note the advise given in this forum is unofficial, please use the links we have for a more detailed response or see an independent financial adviser.
Carnoustie
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 793
Joined: 31 Jan 2007, 22:00

Post by Carnoustie »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
I think it was a case of RM playing the CWU for a chump. While the horse bolted in the background, the union was trying to decide if it was a Unicorn or a thoroughbred, in fact it turned out to be a donkey.
:funneh :funneh :funneh
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Post by BELIAL »

Battle weary? most of us were just warming up :shock:
pinstripe
Posts: 2461
Joined: 25 May 2007, 16:42
Gender: Male
Location: 2 left turns from reality

Post by pinstripe »

I think we must unite, then fight. At the moment RM have divided us, but the waverers are coming around. There will always be the give up mob, the ones who don't use their vote and complain we can never win, but even they must accept that some of us are still willing to stand for their rights.
Night Tonic
Posts: 1474
Joined: 23 Oct 2007, 21:35

Post by Night Tonic »

You're quite right pinstripe although it might be a bit simplistic to narrow it down to fighters and those who give up. Generally most of us have mixed feelings. I'm a stong believer in not being beaten by bigger people but I watched the entire parliament debate on PO closures today and one thing both Hutton and McFadden made clear was that biggest reason for shutting PO's was affordability and what the tax payer would put up with. Pan that out on paying pensions and its pretty obvious that NO money will be coming from government. This country has I think,the biggest debt in Europe.

Fight yes, but with what in mind? The best we're likely to get out of this is some climb-down on elements of RM's proposal but if there is, there won't be much. Every single public pension plan (and lots of private ones) is struggling with the fact that people are living longer and pension providers paying out more. Even if there wasn't a deficit (and some doubt that), we'd still have to have revised pension plans. That doesn't mean I'd roll over, I won't, but best we'll get is small change - particularly when the unions left the decision on pensions so ambiguous.