ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

No strikes before privatisation?

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
wookie
Posts: 319
Joined: 30 Dec 2011, 12:38
Gender: Male

No strikes before privatisation?

Post by wookie »

Just been reading on the BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24294745, that they are confident in completing the privatisation before the ballot results are announced, or maybe finished.
STEWYMAC
Posts: 11
Joined: 28 Jul 2011, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: No strikes before privatisation?

Post by STEWYMAC »

Perhaps we should all consider working to rule up until the strike,no one in early,correct delivery methods utilised,breaks taken,no overtime worked,that alone will have a massive effect and give a taste of what is likely to come.We will still be paid and be going home on time,no more goodwill.
viking1488
Posts: 446
Joined: 15 May 2009, 15:37
Gender: Male

Re: No strikes before privatisation?

Post by viking1488 »

well the royal mail have the union well on the back foot this time I would not trust a thing the rm say this will all end in tears :arrrghhh
gary1975
Posts: 482
Joined: 16 Apr 2011, 13:41
Gender: Male

Re: No strikes before privatisation?

Post by gary1975 »

STEWYMAC wrote:Perhaps we should all consider working to rule up until the strike,no one in early,correct delivery methods utilised,breaks taken,no overtime worked,that alone will have a massive effect and give a taste of what is likely to come.We will still be paid and be going home on time,no more goodwill.
That would be interesting in my office working to rule, most of the part timers are on 20hr contracts and therefore there time would be up at half past one,when the office finish time is three o'clock :nana :nana :nana
wandle
Posts: 944
Joined: 25 Feb 2011, 17:17
Gender: Male

Re: No strikes before privatisation?

Post by wandle »

As soon as I heard in WTLL this week, via RMTV, that they had set a closing date of 7th October for people to 'opt out' of the free shares, my brain thought...
'Dammit, that's a full 16 days before our earliest legal strike date, 23rd October!'

I suspected straightaway that they were aiming to float the business on the stock market in that 'window of opportunity'.

CWU, you have been too slow off the mark. You're a shambles of a union :d'oh!
Ahebban
Posts: 695
Joined: 19 May 2009, 13:41
Gender: Male
Location: Left of ... Left

Re: No strikes before privatisation?

Post by Ahebban »

Our ballot is not designed to prevent the sale of Royal Mail. However, it is designed for members to say an overwhelming 'YES' to give CWU the base from which to protect and improve our pay, terms and conditions, pension and job security.

This government is hell-bent on selling Royal Mail so short of the population marching on parliament to stop it, the sale will go through. We can, and will, make the 'new owners' very aware that we are not going away, and will always be the thorn in their side for a long time to come if we show solidarity at this crucial time.
Ahebban - anglo-saxon in origin - meaning 'Wages War'

What counts is not necessarily the size of the dog in the fight, what counts is the size of the fight in the dog. - Mark Twain
IcanthelpthewayIam
Posts: 4067
Joined: 26 May 2009, 13:37
Gender: Male

Re: No strikes before privatisation?

Post by IcanthelpthewayIam »

STEWYMAC wrote:Perhaps we should all consider working to rule up until the strike
unfortunately that is also considered by law as industrial action and you would need to have a vote for that as well
borders
Posts: 1304
Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 09:10

Re: No strikes before privatisation?

Post by borders »

Ahebban wrote:Our ballot is not designed to prevent the sale of Royal Mail. However, it is designed for members to say an overwhelming 'YES' to give CWU the base from which to protect and improve our pay, terms and conditions, pension and job security.

This government is hell-bent on selling Royal Mail so short of the population marching on parliament to stop it, the sale will go through. We can, and will, make the 'new owners' very aware that we are not going away, and will always be the thorn in their side for a long time to come if we show solidarity at this crucial time.
spot on post , its a ballot to secure our terms and conditions going forward .....
"why should it just be the bankers, politicians and the idle rich who get all the best things ? we demand a standard of living for our members that enables them to share in the fine wines and times that the likes of Cameron and his Eton buddies take for granted " - the late great Bob Crow RIP.
bogstandard
Posts: 1074
Joined: 08 Nov 2007, 06:16

Re: No strikes before privatisation?

Post by bogstandard »

zx135 wrote:
STEWYMAC wrote:Perhaps we should all consider working to rule up until the strike
unfortunately that is also considered by law as industrial action and you would need to have a vote for that as well
as long as you keep it to yourself you can do it and if others follow ... well that's their decision.
Confused... You won't be, after the next episode of. SOAP
RobertT
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 6691
Joined: 09 Sep 2007, 14:26
Gender: Male

Re: No strikes before privatisation?

Post by RobertT »

STEWYMAC wrote:Perhaps we should all consider working to rule up until the strike,no one in early,correct delivery methods utilised,breaks taken,no overtime worked,that alone will have a massive effect and give a taste of what is likely to come.We will still be paid and be going home on time,no more goodwill.
Shouldn't everyone be doing that anyway?
Links to all RM pension related websites are here
pop it in pete
Posts: 351
Joined: 09 Jun 2007, 23:03
Location: lazy town

Re: No strikes before privatisation?

Post by pop it in pete »

wandle wrote:As soon as I heard in WTLL this week, via RMTV, that they had set a closing date of 7th October for people to 'opt out' of the free shares, my brain thought...
'Dammit, that's a full 16 days before our earliest legal strike date, 23rd October!'

I suspected straightaway that they were aiming to float the business on the stock market in that 'window of opportunity'.

CWU, you have been too slow off the mark. You're a shambles of a union :d'oh!
Wrong! This union is ahead of the game and prepared to vote and negotiate with a nationalised company or a private company for our terms and conditions for the future regardless of who owns the company. Don't forget with only 40-50 % being sold off and 10% going to employees the Government will still have a major say as a large stakeholder possible the major stakeholder 10% employee 40% private 50% Government.
flaminmoses
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 819
Joined: 05 Jul 2009, 14:17
Gender: Male

Re: No strikes before privatisation?

Post by flaminmoses »

what investor in their right mind would buy royal mail shares with strikes looming :left:

the float is gonna be a massive disaster imo

and you have to question whther the government know this and .....if they still go ahead with it it surely means some hands in the cookie jar scenario.
skull
Posts: 450
Joined: 15 Nov 2010, 19:31
Gender: Male

Re: No strikes before privatisation?

Post by skull »

flaminmoses wrote:what investor in their right mind would buy royal mail shares with strikes looming :left:

the float is gonna be a massive disaster imo

I don't anybody from general public who are buying. Industrial action will throw a spanner in the works, there's no doubt about that. Hope your right. :pray
bensonhedge
Posts: 448
Joined: 15 Mar 2010, 20:14
Gender: Male

Re: No strikes before privatisation?

Post by bensonhedge »

STEWYMAC wrote:Perhaps we should all consider working to rule up until the strike,no one in early,correct delivery methods utilised,breaks taken,no overtime worked,that alone will have a massive effect and give a taste of what is likely to come.We will still be paid and be going home on time,no more goodwill.
hahahahaha.....good luck with that one mate!!
Andy51
Posts: 91
Joined: 08 Jan 2013, 15:45
Gender: Male

Re: No strikes before privatisation?

Post by Andy51 »

Our office would prefer to work to rule /others said they are coming in, can't be bother after the last strike was a disaster think the horse has bolted