ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

WHAT WILL BALLOT RESULT BE?

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
superman
Posts: 39
Joined: 06 Oct 2007, 12:19

..

Post by superman »

The thing is members are not told what will happen if a no result comes. A lot of posties are scared it will be all out which a lot will not do. If the union said right if iits to be a no vote we will start with 4 weeks of rolling strikes etc

Comes down to the same response NO COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE COMMUNICATIONS UNION
barkersboy
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 105
Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 12:11

Post by barkersboy »

Sounds like you've given up comrade, I really hope not. I think that most people who have come into this industry over the years, recent or not, have done so more out of necessity rather than a career move. The difference is perhaps the younger ones do not have our background in the labour movement - we have to earn there trust and respect as well as teach them what a union is.

It is my view that the issues you discribe in your office around loss of overtime, full time jobs etc would have happened with or without this deal. Actualy it has been going on in many offices for some time, in some cases years. With the financial state the commpany is in it is enevitable, these attacks will be and have been fought over the years. With thousands of workplaces this sort of thing could never be fought centrally. I have been shocked be people on this site - the self styled left wing militants - who are the ones who believe they can not hold the line. Bizzare really these are the very people who should be able to organise the workers after all they keep telling everybody how to do it. But apparently cant do it themselves. I do not necessarily put you in this camp barkersboy its just an observation.

It also has to be said that if the union controlled things centrally those very people shouting for it now would be arguing against it. They would be calling HQ stalinist dictators. I've seen this happen before in other unions. believe me the CWU is more open and democratic than any other union I have experienced.

Local Reps must go to there Area Reps with diagreements (talk to them in advance if you need to) then if required the Area Rep can pass to Divisional rep. If it cant be resolved a strike ballot can be requested. Also your Branch is there to assist and guide you if you need them.

Good luck and remember - never, ever give up.

I have not given up Kill Joy. I will pursue the need of people. I want all people to have full time jobs so they can pay the bills dictated by others. I mean, Income Tax, Council Tax, Rubbish tax need I go on. Our members have to live in a world that is at best bearable, at worst being on the bread line. We are not the average earners of £30k plus, who can afford to go to live shows in London or take exotic holidays in Barbados. We are the ordinary people who need to survive to live.
There is no such thing as a strong union anymore. Other unions have amalgamated to hope that they have the clout to make a difference. The difference has not been achieved. Indeed the law on union activity is such that only individual sections of a union can take industrial action if it affects their part of a business.
You sayl that local reps, should go to Area or Divisional Reps to resolve problems. Hang on a minute. I have not heard any Area Rep or Div Rep say anything against the agreement . So where does the local rep hope to seek support.
If a yes vote is achieved I can not see how branch or division can support the members who are already suffering from RMs executive actions.

I keep the faith. My union will fail me.
barkersboy
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 105
Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 12:11

Post by barkersboy »

I've changed my bets ha

65 yes

35 no

You are a son of a bitch, but u have always been right before. See my other posts and u will see why I agree.

May the sunshine on us all, May the force be with our colleagues.
L Tommo
Posts: 3165
Joined: 06 Feb 2007, 09:43
Gender: Male
Location: WATCHING YOU WATCHING ME!

Post by L Tommo »

I think it will be NO.. 99.9% YES 0.1% ....



Lets keep the battle for the NO vote and never give up...

Im not going to let some jumped up fat sweaty and a wide boy from west London ave us over.... FECK EM!!! AND THESE TWO AS WELL :lfo :cfo


OUT :wave
L TOMMO.... ILLEGITIMIS NON CARBORUNDUM........

EAST LONDON MAIL CENTER-ISHHHH
madelin4
Posts: 1220
Joined: 04 Jun 2007, 16:56

Post by madelin4 »

either way it is downhill anyway!! :d'oh!
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Post by BELIAL »

I think it will be close : 99% no but at least 1% abstentions.But then again Iam infected with the optomistic virus one symptom of which is an innate respect for the common sense of my fellow workers.
Should I be proved wrong in any materially significant respect I may consider climbing aboard with the other career politician posters and doing a number on the witless masses, NAH only kidding ,I'd rather get my eyeballs pierced with white hot ring nails
brothermagrew
Posts: 3015
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 16:38
Gender: Male
Location: Shares a border with England to the south.

Post by brothermagrew »

L Tommo wrote:I think it will be NO.. 99.9% YES 0.1% ....



Lets keep the battle for the NO vote and never give up...

Im not going to let some jumped up fat sweaty and a wide boy from west London ave us over.... FECK EM!!! AND THESE TWO AS WELL :lfo :cfo


OUT :wave
Well said brother. I say our L Tommo should get Billy Hayes job :wave :wave
piranha
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 496
Joined: 01 Aug 2007, 09:30
Gender: Male

Post by piranha »

Well I have'nt met 1 person in my area who will vote Yes
so I reckon 82% NO 18% YES Surely they can't fix the
result, can they?! :pray
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72700
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: change

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

lovejoy wrote:I've changed my bets ha

65 yes

35 no
I think it will probably be a Yes but a lot closer than that, have you heard something.

(52% yes - 47% No - 1 % Spoiled) on a turnout barely above 52% is my guess)
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
elingviking
Posts: 14
Joined: 03 Jun 2007, 21:49

what will ballott result be

Post by elingviking »

After voting NO myself I still expect it will be a Yes vote because the workforce are fed up with pissing into the wind. If it is a NO vote then I expect Hayes and Co to take that as a vote of no confidence and resign , then we might get somebody with bollox to stand up for us all and :lfo :cfo
k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

Re: change

Post by k979aaa »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
lovejoy wrote:I've changed my bets ha

65 yes

35 no
I think it will probably be a Yes but a lot closer than that, have you heard something.

(52% yes - 47% No - 1 % Spoiled) on a turnout barely above 52% is my guess)
You can bet royalmail will use the 48% if you think the turnout will be that low. No matter what anyone vote's so long as they vote for if anyone has not voted their is still time just vote now. ballot close's at 12:00 tomorrow post it NOW!.
South East Postie
Posts: 154
Joined: 14 May 2007, 13:25
Gender: Male

Post by South East Postie »

lets face it, ward and hayes cant take the embarrassment of a no vote. it will be rigged, that im sure of. say if the no vote wins 52 to 48, they will call it a yes vote. how else was the way backwards agreement voted in!
lovejoy
Posts: 1255
Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 12:59

Re: change

Post by lovejoy »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
lovejoy wrote:I've changed my bets ha

65 yes

35 no
I think it will probably be a Yes but a lot closer than that, have you heard something.

(52% yes - 47% No - 1 % Spoiled) on a turnout barely above 52% is my guess)
not heard anything mate, just a gut feeling!

I echo Killjoy sentiments as well that hardly any of the branches going for no vote will achieve one!
k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

Post by k979aaa »

For the record turnout at last ballot 65.5% of total 77.56% for industrial action and 22.44% voteing no to industrial action lets just see what happens this time. my prediction is 10% more turnout and a 5% swing to rejection of the so called "deal".
IWW Fellow Worker
Posts: 3644
Joined: 30 May 2007, 14:27
Gender: Male

Post by IWW Fellow Worker »

k979aaa wrote:For the record turnout at last ballot 65.5% of total 77.56% for industrial action and 22.44% voteing no to industrial action lets just see what happens this time. my prediction is 10% more turnout and a 5% swing to rejection of the so called "deal".
I hope so!
The Industrial Workers of the World. The union whose members never scab!

"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."