ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Back to the revisions then?

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4276
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: Back to the revisions then?

Post by Martin Walsh »

Royal Mail want lots of things but there is nothing in business transformation which says you have to achieve 100bsi. Start times are negotiatable and are driven by the arrival of your second batch of sequencing.

Royal Mail will attempt to get what they want from the revision , the Cwu should attempt to get what the members want and use the disagreement procedure if you want .
justdeno
Posts: 362
Joined: 27 Jan 2012, 16:05
Gender: Female

Re: Back to the revisions then?

Post by justdeno »

We're having our revisions in the new year. Been told will be starting 8am or later. Is there any rule to not allow this, other offices in the area still start early,(they have had revisions) and out on delivery at 8am. Most days already 9am specials fail, have a friend claiming cos it did not get ther until 9.10am :dance .
justdeno
Posts: 362
Joined: 27 Jan 2012, 16:05
Gender: Female

Re: Back to the revisions then?

Post by justdeno »

Also, walk sequencing was implemented Sept 2011, still no money, was promised it several times. Still waiting for a 39 hr week. Can we claim that 1hr as overtime? :crazy:
pat242
Posts: 2
Joined: 21 Nov 2012, 18:51
Gender: Male

Post by pat242 »

hans solo wrote:well west of scot expected to achieve 100% +
moved our start times and finish times to later
you should have registerd a disagreement
pat242
Posts: 2
Joined: 21 Nov 2012, 18:51
Gender: Male

Re: Back to the revisions then?

Post by pat242 »

justdeno wrote:We're having our revisions in the new year. Been told will be starting 8am or later. Is there any rule to not allow this, other offices in the area still start early,(they have had revisions) and out on delivery at 8am. Most days already 9am specials fail, have a friend claiming cos it did not get ther until 9.10am :dance .
transformation agreement states no Delivery office will start later than 7.00am
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16688
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re:

Post by clashcityrocker »

pat242 wrote:
hans solo wrote:well west of scot expected to achieve 100% +
moved our start times and finish times to later
you should have registerd a disagreement
Why didn't we think of that earlier?

Oh I know. When we didn't appear to have any backing at Area Or Divisional level - where were our disagreements going to go?
And when some offices who hadn't seen a penny of their TLS were willing to agree, what use were isolated offices.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Back to the revisions then?

Post by fishtank »

pat242 wrote:transformation agreement states no Delivery office will start later than 7.00am

No it doesn't.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Back to the revisions then?

Post by dvbuk55 »

fishtank wrote:
pat242 wrote:transformation agreement states no Delivery office will start later than 7.00am

No it doesn't.
The words are the words.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72725
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Back to the revisions then?

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

dvbuk55 wrote:
fishtank wrote:
pat242 wrote:transformation agreement states no Delivery office will start later than 7.00am

No it doesn't.
The words are the words.
Indeed and the words are not "No" but "Vast majority", and "duties" not "offices"
As part of the operational transformation the vast majority of full time delivery duties will start no later than 0700
.

Of course depends on your definition of vast majority - 90% would be considered as such by us, but would RM consider 60% as within the definition. A further problem is that the term "duties" can be read as within the office (for us), or for the whole country (RM). That's the problems the words are the words but as with most of the BT2010 agreement the definition of those words is up for interpretation.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
motherhubbard
Posts: 1001
Joined: 08 Feb 2010, 17:13
Gender: Female
Location: in the cupboard

Re: Back to the revisions then?

Post by motherhubbard »

I always thought the "vast majority" was in there because hybrid duties will have to start later.
In a town the last letter is 3pm.
On a basic 8hr day that means a full-time duty has to begin at 7am at the latest.
Never let the hand you hold, hold you down.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Back to the revisions then?

Post by dvbuk55 »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:
fishtank wrote:
pat242 wrote:transformation agreement states no Delivery office will start later than 7.00am

No it doesn't.
The words are the words.
Indeed and the words are not "No" but "Vast majority", and "duties" not "offices"
As part of the operational transformation the vast majority of full time delivery duties will start no later than 0700
.

Of course depends on your definition of vast majority - 90% would be considered as such by us, but would RM consider 60% as within the definition. A further problem is that the term "duties" can be read as within the office (for us), or for the whole country (RM). That's the problems the words are the words but as with most of the BT2010 agreement the definition of those words is up for interpretation.
A fact that was pointed out many times but was ignored because of "the spirit of the agreement".
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Back to the revisions then?

Post by fishtank »

motherhubbard wrote:In a town the last letter is 3pm..
That's a self imposed constraint though.
It isn't part of the USO and there are no penalties for breaching it so really it's pretty meaningless. :neutral:
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
Stormproof
Posts: 6116
Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 21:03
Gender: Female

Re: Back to the revisions then?

Post by Stormproof »

Still on hold in my area. I was in a meeting with the Area Rep and Div Rep yesterday and as far as I know nothing has changed. I've been released to attend the forum in London but is it worth it, will anything change? :hmmmm
So keep on moving, moving, moving your feet
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets


Illegitimi non carborundum
mandelsons_toenail
Posts: 1294
Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 18:16
Gender: Male
Location: Outer Hebrides

Re: Back to the revisions then?

Post by mandelsons_toenail »

Well I went this week and found it good

We need to kick back at rm
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: Back to the revisions then?

Post by Big Daz »

I found it good as well, Bob Gibson is like a angry dragon at the moment so definitely go at the very least you get to hear direct from the horses mouth in details whats happening and why.

Once the officers have said their piece then the meeting is opened to questions from the reps. Anything you want to say/ask you you can do so, Dave Bob Terry Ray are a captive audience so if you have an issue you want to bring to their attention you can get a answer there and then.