Is it because you made it up and it doesn't exist?
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2772
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..
Why on earth would you think I would comment on something so specific if it wasn’t something I knew about?Acca Dacca wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 19:55Im not going to call you a liar Barnacle but I will say I dont believe you
Ridiculous. Believe what you want.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2772
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..
Thought you said you weren’t calling me a liar?
This is why you are completely unaware of any discrepancy between the experience of male and female employees, you just deny it exists.
Whatever
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
Ren Hoëk
- Posts: 737
- Joined: 01 Feb 2018, 12:19
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..
Where have I said im not calling you a liar?
You've made a pretty bold claim. Claim to have evidence. Asked to share it. Will not share it. Continue to deflect. You've put yourself in this little situation.
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2772
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..
I’m astounded you think it a ‘bold claim’ that there is a discrepancy in advancement between men and women at RM. It’s in evidence the world over and yet you doubt that it happens at all at RM because you have no experience of it?Ren Hoëk wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 20:13Where have I said im not calling you a liar?
You've made a pretty bold claim. Claim to have evidence. Asked to share it. Will not share it. Continue to deflect. You've put yourself in this little situation.
Give your head a wobble.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
Ren Hoëk
- Posts: 737
- Joined: 01 Feb 2018, 12:19
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..
No, you've claimed woman are overlooked when being made up to full time in Royal Mail and claim to have evidence. Its quite a specific thing. Lets have it?Barnacle wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 20:21I’m astounded you think it a ‘bold claim’ that there is a discrepancy in advancement between men and women at RM. It’s in evidence the world over and yet you doubt that it happens at all at RM because you have no experience of it?Ren Hoëk wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 20:13Where have I said im not calling you a liar?
You've made a pretty bold claim. Claim to have evidence. Asked to share it. Will not share it. Continue to deflect. You've put yourself in this little situation.
Give your head a wobble.
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2772
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..
Away and bully someone else. Don’t believe me.Ren Hoëk wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 20:32No, you've claimed woman are overlooked when being made up to full time in Royal Mail and claim to have evidence. Its quite a specific thing. Lets have it?Barnacle wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 20:21I’m astounded you think it a ‘bold claim’ that there is a discrepancy in advancement between men and women at RM. It’s in evidence the world over and yet you doubt that it happens at all at RM because you have no experience of it?Ren Hoëk wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 20:13Where have I said im not calling you a liar?
You've made a pretty bold claim. Claim to have evidence. Asked to share it. Will not share it. Continue to deflect. You've put yourself in this little situation.
Give your head a wobble.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
Ren Hoëk
- Posts: 737
- Joined: 01 Feb 2018, 12:19
- Gender: Male
-
Sean06
- Posts: 2339
- Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..
Just beginning to realise is ren hoek another name for im sure you can guess maybe a 5th account??its either his way or the highway lol
-
Sean06
- Posts: 2339
- Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..
Or are they actually members of cwu?not entitled to vote.yellowbelly wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 18:14Or just forgetting/not bothering to vote at all?Sean06 wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 16:29Have you asked them all??and are they just saying no but actually voting yes?hewittinspain wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 15:33Not from my feedback it will be a massive yes. I work in a big office and I'd say a good 80% will definitely be voting no on the deal.chickenwittle wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025, 16:20It will be a massive yes vote , the majority want a pay rise now the uso nonsense can take care of itself.
-
Sean06
- Posts: 2339
- Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..
Never in 30 years have i heard such rubbish why would a rep go out of his way to do it.hewittinspain wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 17:00The rep sent printouts to the staff to ask what they would vote.Sean06 wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 16:29Have you asked them all??and are they just saying no but actually voting yes?hewittinspain wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 15:33Not from my feedback it will be a massive yes. I work in a big office and I'd say a good 80% will definitely be voting no on the deal.chickenwittle wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025, 16:20It will be a massive yes vote , the majority want a pay rise now the uso nonsense can take care of itself.
-
Ren Hoëk
- Posts: 737
- Joined: 01 Feb 2018, 12:19
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..
I'm sorry, Who am I also meant to be? Are you having paranoid delusions and seeing enemies everywhere? Maybe time to take a break.
-
hewittinspain
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 264
- Joined: 20 May 2013, 21:24
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..
Why have you worked in all offices?Sean06 wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 22:32Never in 30 years have i heard such rubbish why would a rep go out of his way to do it.hewittinspain wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 17:00The rep sent printouts to the staff to ask what they would vote.Sean06 wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 16:29Have you asked them all??and are they just saying no but actually voting yes?hewittinspain wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 15:33Not from my feedback it will be a massive yes. I work in a big office and I'd say a good 80% will definitely be voting no on the deal.chickenwittle wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025, 16:20It will be a massive yes vote , the majority want a pay rise now the uso nonsense can take care of itself.
I take it you're happy with 4.2% and then strings on the following two years after that?
-
thefox
- Posts: 1146
- Joined: 24 Aug 2010, 20:09
- Gender: Male
Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..
Ignore the clown he specialises in snide posts,he's accusing you of being other posters but still denying he's that aiden character despite very similar posting style.
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2772
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: CWU No.2 recommends NO vote..
I think Sean06 is questioning why a rep would do a printed survey to find out how people will be voting. That is a bit odd and not something a rep should do really.hewittinspain wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 10:16Why have you worked in all offices?Sean06 wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 22:32Never in 30 years have i heard such rubbish why would a rep go out of his way to do it.hewittinspain wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 17:00The rep sent printouts to the staff to ask what they would vote.Sean06 wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 16:29Have you asked them all??and are they just saying no but actually voting yes?hewittinspain wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 15:33Not from my feedback it will be a massive yes. I work in a big office and I'd say a good 80% will definitely be voting no on the deal.chickenwittle wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025, 16:20It will be a massive yes vote , the majority want a pay rise now the uso nonsense can take care of itself.
I take it you're happy with 4.2% and then strings on the following two years after that?
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’