It's hardly fair to say there was only one dissenting voice at the meeting today. There was a healthy debate over the future job. Almost all questions from the floor were to clarify aspects of the Agreement - this is the stage we are at.
I doubt if any reps have had members meetings on the Agreement so are not yet aware of all members feelings. As I see it we were there to gather accurate information and point out pitfalls.
The audience were the reps who represent workers in delivery who took up to 17 days, and more, industrial action in 2009, including several days unofficial action in response to management bullying, and in support of a strong national union with the industrial strength to enforce local deals. We will have to justify that support when presenting the deal to members.
It has to be said that most of the criticism from the floor concerned whether RM managers can be relied on to implement the Agreement as outlined by Leadership.
I only heard one cry of sell out over later Saturdays.
D2D presentation was impressive but cannot hide the loss of earnings involved for most delivery workers in the central belt who deliver 3 a week.
A pay cut in return for industrial action is no good.