ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
richietns
Posts: 1070
Joined: 17 Oct 2011, 18:09
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by richietns »

norris9 wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 18:06
Edward Hunter wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 13:31
what was the point it was always going to be accepted? Nobody would have been willing to strike in the hope of an extra %. It would have cost us more than we would gain in any case as the CWU agree that the company has no spare cash. Just need to get the "agreement" implimented to everyones satisfaction now. Im sure that will go smoothly :crazy:
Yeah, I have no idea why people are whining about the result, especially with the amount of people that were moaning about the last strikes we had and how much money they lost because of it.

Some posties would prefer to strike for 1% extra? The maths don't make any sense. :crazy:
Its not just about the money cwu said a no strings pay rise while backdooring the changes and siding what seems to be all the time with RM so called poverty-stricken I'm gonna go bankrupt mantra.
Sean06
Posts: 2339
Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by Sean06 »

qwerty2 wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 18:16
norris9 wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 18:06
Edward Hunter wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 13:31
what was the point it was always going to be accepted? Nobody would have been willing to strike in the hope of an extra %. It would have cost us more than we would gain in any case as the CWU agree that the company has no spare cash. Just need to get the "agreement" implimented to everyones satisfaction now. Im sure that will go smoothly :crazy:
Yeah, I have no idea why people are whining about the result, especially with the amount of people that were moaning about the last strikes we had and how much money they lost because of it.

Some posties would prefer to strike for 1% extra? The maths don't make any sense. :crazy:
The point is over 50% in the union didn't bother voting on pay!! :arrrghhh
Nobody can force people to vote.
richietns
Posts: 1070
Joined: 17 Oct 2011, 18:09
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by richietns »

Sean06 wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 20:07
qwerty2 wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 18:16
norris9 wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 18:06
Edward Hunter wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 13:31
what was the point it was always going to be accepted? Nobody would have been willing to strike in the hope of an extra %. It would have cost us more than we would gain in any case as the CWU agree that the company has no spare cash. Just need to get the "agreement" implimented to everyones satisfaction now. Im sure that will go smoothly :crazy:
Yeah, I have no idea why people are whining about the result, especially with the amount of people that were moaning about the last strikes we had and how much money they lost because of it.

Some posties would prefer to strike for 1% extra? The maths don't make any sense. :crazy:
The point is over 50% in the union didn't bother voting on pay!! :arrrghhh
Nobody can force people to vote.
yeah we know.
Sean06
Posts: 2339
Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by Sean06 »

richietns wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 20:17
Sean06 wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 20:07
qwerty2 wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 18:16
norris9 wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 18:06
Edward Hunter wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 13:31
what was the point it was always going to be accepted? Nobody would have been willing to strike in the hope of an extra %. It would have cost us more than we would gain in any case as the CWU agree that the company has no spare cash. Just need to get the "agreement" implimented to everyones satisfaction now. Im sure that will go smoothly :crazy:
Yeah, I have no idea why people are whining about the result, especially with the amount of people that were moaning about the last strikes we had and how much money they lost because of it.

Some posties would prefer to strike for 1% extra? The maths don't make any sense. :crazy:
The point is over 50% in the union didn't bother voting on pay!! :arrrghhh
Nobody can force people to vote.
yeah we know.
So really your point is why did over 50% not vote.can you answer it? I certaintly cannot but how many people vote in a general election now.
menditsa
Posts: 371
Joined: 22 Jun 2024, 08:06
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by menditsa »

Sean06 wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 23:14
So really your point is why did over 50% not vote.can you answer it? I certaintly cannot but how many people vote in a general election now.
In my case I never got the letter to vote, CWU rep wasn't interested so although I wanted to vote I couldn't !!!
Jonathan Alsatian
Posts: 98
Joined: 10 Oct 2024, 21:00
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by Jonathan Alsatian »

The CWU communication posted in the top post of this thread says "we will be issuing wider communications tomorrow on the EP Group/CWU agreement". That didn't happen. Unless I missed it.
ted_e_bear
Posts: 3933
Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by ted_e_bear »

Jonathan Alsatian wrote:
28 Aug 2025, 10:57
The CWU communication posted in the top post of this thread says "we will be issuing wider communications tomorrow on the EP Group/CWU agreement". That didn't happen. Unless I missed it.
There's a YouTube session today, might be some info

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=117085
Scointer
Posts: 36
Joined: 03 Jun 2023, 14:11
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by Scointer »

Jonathan Alsatian wrote:
28 Aug 2025, 10:57
The CWU communication posted in the top post of this thread says "we will be issuing wider communications tomorrow on the EP Group/CWU agreement". That didn't happen. Unless I missed it.
It is here

https://www.cwu.org/ltb/ltb-186-25-ep-g ... nt-update/
richietns
Posts: 1070
Joined: 17 Oct 2011, 18:09
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by richietns »

Sean06 wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 23:14
richietns wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 20:17
Sean06 wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 20:07
qwerty2 wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 18:16
norris9 wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 18:06
Edward Hunter wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 13:31
what was the point it was always going to be accepted? Nobody would have been willing to strike in the hope of an extra %. It would have cost us more than we would gain in any case as the CWU agree that the company has no spare cash. Just need to get the "agreement" implimented to everyones satisfaction now. Im sure that will go smoothly :crazy:
Yeah, I have no idea why people are whining about the result, especially with the amount of people that were moaning about the last strikes we had and how much money they lost because of it.

Some posties would prefer to strike for 1% extra? The maths don't make any sense. :crazy:
The point is over 50% in the union didn't bother voting on pay!! :arrrghhh
Nobody can force people to vote.
yeah we know.
So really your point is why did over 50% not vote.can you answer it? I certaintly cannot but how many people vote in a general election now.
Apathy.
SkiSunday
Posts: 790
Joined: 05 Jan 2025, 18:19
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by SkiSunday »

richietns wrote:
28 Aug 2025, 16:27
Sean06 wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 23:14
richietns wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 20:17
Sean06 wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 20:07
qwerty2 wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 18:16
norris9 wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 18:06
Edward Hunter wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 13:31
what was the point it was always going to be accepted? Nobody would have been willing to strike in the hope of an extra %. It would have cost us more than we would gain in any case as the CWU agree that the company has no spare cash. Just need to get the "agreement" implimented to everyones satisfaction now. Im sure that will go smoothly :crazy:
Yeah, I have no idea why people are whining about the result, especially with the amount of people that were moaning about the last strikes we had and how much money they lost because of it.

Some posties would prefer to strike for 1% extra? The maths don't make any sense. :crazy:
The point is over 50% in the union didn't bother voting on pay!! :arrrghhh
Nobody can force people to vote.
yeah we know.
So really your point is why did over 50% not vote.can you answer it? I certaintly cannot but how many people vote in a general election now.
Apathy.
In simpler terms, laziness. Same as the workers on cushy numbers that would never work on delivery ain't that right Aiden01? :shhhhh :chuckle