ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Walks over 3.5 hours
-
LUV THE SMELL OF LETTERS
- Posts: 64
- Joined: 04 Feb 2008, 11:34
- Location: north london
Walks over 3.5 hours
Is any one else wanting to do walks over 3.5 hours.
Lizard lounge seems to like the fact of a 4 hour delivery
Yes or no
Lizard lounge seems to like the fact of a 4 hour delivery
Yes or no
-
coaster
- Posts: 105
- Joined: 03 Jan 2008, 20:52
Re: Walks over 3.5 hours
Anything over 4 would be more than enough for me (personally speaking). 3.5 suits me anyway.LUV THE SMELL OF LETTERS wrote:Is any one else wanting to do walks over 3.5 hours.
Lizard lounge seems to like the fact of a 4 hour delivery
Yes or no
-
Broxi51
- Posts: 1154
- Joined: 30 Jul 2007, 19:04
- Location: Scotland
-
pinstripe
- Posts: 2474
- Joined: 25 May 2007, 16:42
- Gender: Male
- Location: 2 left turns from reality
No, 3.5 hours is long enough. Just imagine delivering, on foot, for over 4 hours, in the middle of winter or summer with no toilets, no shelter and no van to sit in. Soaking wet either from rain or sweat. Anyway there was rightly, a huge fuss made when we went to 3.5 hours from 2.5 hours. I'm sure that it was decided that 3.5 hours would be the maximum length of delivery. Add in time to and from the delivery which can be anything from 10 minutes to an hour and the idea is a non-starter. I'm just turned 40 and very fit and active but 3.5 hours on delivery pushes me, any more and like many others I'll spend more time of sick due to bad back, joint problems or exhaustion. You have to take into account the physical wellbeing of the workers over the course of time. Remember we could be doing this for 20+ years. If RM were to implement this they would solve the pension problem as we'd be dropping like flies before we reached their 'pension age'. Oh and if you actually made it to 65, they'd change it to 70. Does anyone think they could do this job, with the 'decreasing' mail volumes, for 4.5 hours delivery a day every day?
No this suggestion is ludicrous, the implications have not been thought out and the wishes of the workers haven't been sought. I bet RM will have these in within a year.
No this suggestion is ludicrous, the implications have not been thought out and the wishes of the workers haven't been sought. I bet RM will have these in within a year.
-
traww
- Posts: 69
- Joined: 24 Feb 2008, 10:43
-
madelin4
- Posts: 1220
- Joined: 04 Jun 2007, 16:56
-
mailman71
- Posts: 500
- Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 08:03
-
k979aaa
- Posts: 12578
- Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
- Gender: Male
- Location: THE NORTH
-
ad0128
- Posts: 344
- Joined: 01 Oct 2007, 18:41
-
bandit650
- Posts: 880
- Joined: 14 Aug 2007, 15:42
- Gender: Female
Not being funny ever since they bought in this 1 dilivery per day alot of us have been on deliverys that we are out of the office for just over the 4hrs 15min,we have been in many arguments about it in the office hence now we having even bigger arguments now,this morning they came out with new proposals as we have to loose 360hrs out of the office,thier idea is to get rid of all the reserve duties and get us to cover our days off,hence we have told them to go away i think nobody should be forced into covering for days off going back to 6 days aweek, the only thing they said was they would pay SA rate but if your due to cover a day off and you dont want to or cant then its down to you to get cover,so we have a catch 22 situation here at the moment.
-
DGP1
- Posts: 15551
- Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
- Gender: Male
- Location: Terminus
That's what managers are paid to do not youbandit650 wrote:Not being funny ever since they bought in this 1 dilivery per day alot of us have been on deliverys that we are out of the office for just over the 4hrs 15min,we have been in many arguments about it in the office hence now we having even bigger arguments now,this morning they came out with new proposals as we have to loose 360hrs out of the office,thier idea is to get rid of all the reserve duties and get us to cover our days off,hence we have told them to go away i think nobody should be forced into covering for days off going back to 6 days aweek, the only thing they said was they would pay SA rate but if your due to cover a day off and you dont want to or cant then its down to you to get cover,so we have a catch 22 situation here at the moment.
Most rurals in my DO are around 5 1/2 hours now and only 3 have toilets on them and I tell you it can be quite uncomfortable to go for 6 hours (including traveling time) without a comfort break. Plus anyone who thinks that being in a van makes it easier is deluding themselves because all the van does is takes you from delivery point to delivery point, you're not able to stop for a rest nor do you have the time to sit and wait until the monsoon outside stops you just have to get on with it.
Last edited by DGP1 on 04 Mar 2008, 19:15, edited 1 time in total.
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
-
k979aaa
- Posts: 12578
- Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
- Gender: Male
- Location: THE NORTH
SA rate has been and will continue to be devalued to to point of a standard wage in the near future?.bandit650 wrote:Not being funny ever since they bought in this 1 dilivery per day alot of us have been on deliverys that we are out of the office for just over the 4hrs 15min,we have been in many arguments about it in the office hence now we having even bigger arguments now,this morning they came out with new proposals as we have to loose 360hrs out of the office,thier idea is to get rid of all the reserve duties and get us to cover our days off,hence we have told them to go away i think nobody should be forced into covering for days off going back to 6 days aweek, the only thing they said was they would pay SA rate but if your due to cover a day off and you dont want to or cant then its down to you to get cover,so we have a catch 22 situation here at the moment.
-
Broxi51
- Posts: 1154
- Joined: 30 Jul 2007, 19:04
- Location: Scotland
Just keep saying no mate and they cant stick you with it. No one can be forced to work over their hours. If you sign up to SA then they can force you.bandit650 wrote:Not being funny ever since they bought in this 1 dilivery per day alot of us have been on deliverys that we are out of the office for just over the 4hrs 15min,we have been in many arguments about it in the office hence now we having even bigger arguments now,this morning they came out with new proposals as we have to loose 360hrs out of the office,thier idea is to get rid of all the reserve duties and get us to cover our days off,hence we have told them to go away i think nobody should be forced into covering for days off going back to 6 days aweek, the only thing they said was they would pay SA rate but if your due to cover a day off and you dont want to or cant then its down to you to get cover,so we have a catch 22 situation here at the moment.
-
steviemac
- Posts: 210
- Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 20:29
-
DirtyHarry
- Posts: 5051
- Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: London