ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Saffron Walden and Stansted Posties may be busy next week

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72733
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Saffron Walden and Stansted Posties may be busy next week

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Council apologises for Saffron Walden and Stansted postal vote blunder

http://www.saffronwaldenreporter.co.uk/ ... -1-4976803" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

A mistake has been identified on postal ballot papers issued to voters in Saffron Walden and Stansted, which has forced the district council to apologise.

Uttlesford District Council (UDC) says a small number of papers have serial numbers which do not match the number on their accompanying security statement.

UDC posted letters yesterday (April 13) to voters in Saffron Walden and Stansted who have been affected by the blunder, with new postal ballot papers issued to those residents early next week.

A spokesman for UDC said: “It is important that residents with postal votes check the numbers on their paper and security statement match before returning their votes.

“If the numbers do not match and you have not received a letter by Tuesday morning (April 18) you should ring the council on 01799 510510 and ask to speak to electoral services.

“If the two numbers match, you do not need to do anything except vote as usual. The council apologises for this error and any inconvenience caused.”
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.