ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Talks scheduled
-
markmutley
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 22 Mar 2011, 08:52
- Gender: Male
Talks scheduled
Do we know if any meetings have been arranged between the union and management, also what do you think we should settle for in any agreement I.e 2.8% in the first years pay award or more and what about terms and conditions 5, 7, 10, years what is acceptable, also a no strike deal is not acceptable in my books but where do you draw the line on compromise any views
-
north london driver
- Posts: 560
- Joined: 18 Aug 2010, 21:51
- Gender: Male
Re: Talks scheduled
no compromise on a no strike deal is a must.
the pay deal is not the problem as i think we have had a result.
the terms and conditions should be over 5 years with talks to start to extend for another 3 years.
also overtime ban and work to rule to be voted on,also a vote of no confidence on moya greed.
the pay deal is not the problem as i think we have had a result.
the terms and conditions should be over 5 years with talks to start to extend for another 3 years.
also overtime ban and work to rule to be voted on,also a vote of no confidence on moya greed.
-
Postie_since_1989
- Posts: 18
- Joined: 20 Oct 2013, 11:34
- Gender: Male
Re: Talks scheduled
The general consensus from my colleagues is that a 5 year protection deal on T&C@s would be acceptable, my view is that this is eminently achievable, the 10 years originally demanded is not going to happen, we have to be realistic, but 5 years is the minimum I would accept.
-
demon
- Posts: 732
- Joined: 08 Jul 2009, 14:19
- Gender: Female
Re: Talks scheduled
heard a manager the other day saying there close to a 7 year agreement and just needing to tie up the pension deal and work load agreement
-
dazzlin72
- Posts: 321
- Joined: 25 Jan 2010, 13:56
- Gender: Male
Re: Talks scheduled
I don't see a problem with a no strike clause, if the agreement is water tight, & legally binding by both parties for the duration of the agreement. If broken by RM with executive action etc, then agreement is null & void, & clause terminates.
-
britwrit
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 966
- Joined: 22 Apr 2007, 15:12
Re: Talks scheduled
(For what it's worth...) The Financial Times last week said that talks were scheduled for this week.
-
DGP1
- Posts: 15551
- Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
- Gender: Male
- Location: Terminus
Re: Talks scheduled
I'd be very surprised if there wasn't talks going on even now, RM couldn't spin a 'no talks at all' policy in anything that looks like they're not just spoiling for a fight.
My personal opinion is there will be a better agreement but I don't know if it'll be before the first strike (and it really depends on how well supported the strike is).
My personal opinion is there will be a better agreement but I don't know if it'll be before the first strike (and it really depends on how well supported the strike is).
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: Talks scheduled
Is any agreement?dazzlin72 wrote:I don't see a problem with a no strike clause, if the agreement is water tight.
What does a statement like "1 in 4 Saturdays for the majority of staff(including reserves)" mean to you and what has it meant to Royal Mail?
There are many ways to break the spirit of an agreement without breaking the words and if we agree some kind of "no strike" deal going on past experience we will pay the price.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: Talks scheduled
They're deciding on the menu for the weekRommagic wrote:They should be talking.
-
Dorset Plodder
- Posts: 4351
- Joined: 29 Apr 2009, 20:05
- Gender: Male
Re: Talks scheduled
With a YES vote it may help to concentrate some minds sat around the table.
To jaw-jaw is always better than to war-war (Winston Churchill)
To jaw-jaw is always better than to war-war (Winston Churchill)
Like all Wage Slaves, he had two crosses to bear: The people he worked for and the people he worked with! (Stephen Vizinczey.)
-
Big Daz
- Posts: 5668
- Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
- Gender: Male
Re: Talks scheduled
Courier news flash that comes out on almost daily basis says more talks are scheduled but not when.
-
silly suffolk
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 728
- Joined: 04 Mar 2011, 21:31
- Gender: Male
- Location: deepest suffolk
Re: Talks scheduled
Churchill was a war monger.Dorset Plodder wrote:With a YES vote it may help to concentrate some minds sat around the table.
To jaw-jaw is always better than to war-war (Winston Churchill)
-
DGP1
- Posts: 15551
- Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
- Gender: Male
- Location: Terminus
Re: Talks scheduled
He was a Tory.silly suffolk wrote:Churchill was a war monger.Dorset Plodder wrote:With a YES vote it may help to concentrate some minds sat around the table.
To jaw-jaw is always better than to war-war (Winston Churchill)
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
-
silly suffolk
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 728
- Joined: 04 Mar 2011, 21:31
- Gender: Male
- Location: deepest suffolk
Re: Talks scheduled
remember Gallipoli.