ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

bob gibson said this

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
ass asin
Posts: 157
Joined: 26 Oct 2009, 19:40
Gender: Male

bob gibson said this

Post by ass asin »

bob said at the glasgow meeting that he had writtain to royal mail with regards to an amendment to the payment of the bonus (basically saying the first walk sequencing in an area would trigger payment for those offices that arent to get walk sequencing). now he said he would have an answer within a week.that weeks up!!! i was wondering if neone has heard nething on this? untill this happens all satalite office really should be voting no.
belle smith
Posts: 1557
Joined: 26 Aug 2008, 17:41
Gender: Male
Location: scotland

Re: bob gibson said this

Post by belle smith »

ass asin wrote:untill this happens all satalite office really should be voting no.
Good! Bob if your out there :shhhhh
spilie
Posts: 515
Joined: 28 Oct 2007, 21:48

Re: bob gibson said this

Post by spilie »

bob has a history of headline grabbing statements that when pushed turn out to be hot air so dont expect any news soon
BelfastPostie
Posts: 33
Joined: 05 Nov 2009, 19:58
Gender: Male

Re: bob gibson said this

Post by BelfastPostie »

This latest agreement is the end result of the last 2007 P&M agreement. I can specifically remember Bob Gibson being in Transport House Belfast advising us to vote against the P&M sellout warning us to reject it as he believed that if it were implemented then we would be on the road to ruin. I refer to parts of that agreement involving households and absorption. Thus here we are on the verge of being sold down the river by Bob (who is blatantly advocating the acceptance of this deal) and his merry men. It only conjures up one image, that being Bob and co attempting to join the self preservation society. Dont get me wrong, there are a lot of posties who have and are shooting themselves in the foot by cutting corners doing favours for management by not taking meal breaks, taking out pouches etc etc, (idiots in view) but to be recommended a deal by our own union who are well paid to oversee our terms and conditions are improved, its hard to take it all in. Because for delivery staff it is feckin demoralising and ensures that managers are given carte blanche to run riot over the top of us. The household pay cut is only one issue but the agreement is so vague it can be construed and will be by management to basically make up the rules as they go along. Therefore, one household per day, 6/7 hour walks, joint workshops by management and local CWU reps? Does this mean that the rep will assume responsibility for any postie who is not doing whatever the thug/bully manager wants him to do? Im better off financially in the position I am currently at but more importantly I have dignity and Il be f****d if Im gonna let the local thug/bully intimidate or coerce me into whatever he wants. Vote no to this agreement, there may not be a plan B but at least we will have put up some kind of resistance and send a message to both the heirarchy of CWU and RM
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: bob gibson said this

Post by DirtyHarry »

BelfastPostie wrote:This latest agreement is the end result of the last 2007 P&M agreement. I can specifically remember Bob Gibson being in Transport House Belfast advising us to vote against the P&M sellout warning us to reject it as he believed that if it were implemented then we would be on the road to ruin. I refer to parts of that agreement involving households and absorption. Thus here we are on the verge of being sold down the river by Bob (who is blatantly advocating the acceptance of this deal) and his merry men. It only conjures up one image, that being Bob and co attempting to join the self preservation society. Dont get me wrong, there are a lot of posties who have and are shooting themselves in the foot by cutting corners doing favours for management by not taking meal breaks, taking out pouches etc etc, (idiots in view) but to be recommended a deal by our own union who are well paid to oversee our terms and conditions are improved, its hard to take it all in. Because for delivery staff it is feckin demoralising and ensures that managers are given carte blanche to run riot over the top of us. The household pay cut is only one issue but the agreement is so vague it can be construed and will be by management to basically make up the rules as they go along. Therefore, one household per day, 6/7 hour walks, joint workshops by management and local CWU reps? Does this mean that the rep will assume responsibility for any postie who is not doing whatever the thug/bully manager wants him to do? Im better off financially in the position I am currently at but more importantly I have dignity and Il be f****d if Im gonna let the local thug/bully intimidate or coerce me into whatever he wants. Vote no to this agreement, there may not be a plan B but at least we will have put up some kind of resistance and send a message to both the heirarchy of CWU and RM
Well said, mate. :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause
wf
Posts: 183
Joined: 01 Nov 2009, 13:21
Gender: Male

Re: bob gibson said this

Post by wf »

BelfastPostie wrote:This latest agreement is the end result of the last 2007 P&M agreement. I can specifically remember Bob Gibson being in Transport House Belfast advising us to vote against the P&M sellout warning us to reject it as he believed that if it were implemented then we would be on the road to ruin. I refer to parts of that agreement involving households and absorption. Thus here we are on the verge of being sold down the river by Bob (who is blatantly advocating the acceptance of this deal) and his merry men. It only conjures up one image, that being Bob and co attempting to join the self preservation society. Dont get me wrong, there are a lot of posties who have and are shooting themselves in the foot by cutting corners doing favours for management by not taking meal breaks, taking out pouches etc etc, (idiots in view) but to be recommended a deal by our own union who are well paid to oversee our terms and conditions are improved, its hard to take it all in. Because for delivery staff it is feckin demoralising and ensures that managers are given carte blanche to run riot over the top of us. The household pay cut is only one issue but the agreement is so vague it can be construed and will be by management to basically make up the rules as they go along. Therefore, one household per day, 6/7 hour walks, joint workshops by management and local CWU reps? Does this mean that the rep will assume responsibility for any postie who is not doing whatever the thug/bully manager wants him to do? Im better off financially in the position I am currently at but more importantly I have dignity and Il be f****d if Im gonna let the local thug/bully intimidate or coerce me into whatever he wants. Vote no to this agreement, there may not be a plan B but at least we will have put up some kind of resistance and send a message to both the heirarchy of CWU and RM
ablsolutley spot on .on every account there. :Applause :Applause :Applause
postghost
Posts: 433
Joined: 05 Oct 2007, 21:19

Re: bob gibson said this

Post by postghost »

BelfastPostie wrote:This latest agreement is the end result of the last 2007 P&M agreement. I can specifically remember Bob Gibson being in Transport House Belfast advising us to vote against the P&M sellout warning us to reject it as he believed that if it were implemented then we would be on the road to ruin. I refer to parts of that agreement involving households and absorption. Thus here we are on the verge of being sold down the river by Bob (who is blatantly advocating the acceptance of this deal) and his merry men. It only conjures up one image, that being Bob and co attempting to join the self preservation society. Dont get me wrong, there are a lot of posties who have and are shooting themselves in the foot by cutting corners doing favours for management by not taking meal breaks, taking out pouches etc etc, (idiots in view) but to be recommended a deal by our own union who are well paid to oversee our terms and conditions are improved, its hard to take it all in. Because for delivery staff it is feckin demoralising and ensures that managers are given carte blanche to run riot over the top of us. The household pay cut is only one issue but the agreement is so vague it can be construed and will be by management to basically make up the rules as they go along. Therefore, one household per day, 6/7 hour walks, joint workshops by management and local CWU reps? Does this mean that the rep will assume responsibility for any postie who is not doing whatever the thug/bully manager wants him to do? Im better off financially in the position I am currently at but more importantly I have dignity and Il be f****d if Im gonna let the local thug/bully intimidate or coerce me into whatever he wants. Vote no to this agreement, there may not be a plan B but at least we will have put up some kind of resistance and send a message to both the heirarchy of CWU and RM
:Applause :Applause :Applause