Of course this is going to happen. ST will begin forcing his change through, this will only enrage the workforce and cause even more resistance. Everything ST has done up to now, has only served to drive a wedge further between between the CEO and the workforce. I can't see the "beat them with a stick" approach being dropped anytime soon. Implementing change requires a workforce on board to achieve any successful change. It's the staff that make it work. Honestly, just a handful of staff doing everything by the book, can bring the greatest of plans to a standstill.stevejm wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 18:05It wouldn't be a bad CWU strategy to let RM bring in some of the executive changes - enough to rile the workforce and then have a ballot when members are sufficiently angered to vote yesHalfhappy wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 16:30Right from the start it's been laid out that this will be a long drawn out dispute. The fact has never been danced around, and has been in plain sight, yet people have repeatedly chosen to insist on believing Christmas is the only leverage we have, it's not and never was. DW even said the words, "We'll strike till next Christmas." December is one month, and from RM's point of view, there's another 11 equally important ones. The only leverage we have is long-term disruption, that's is damaging to any business, in any sector. It can't be sustained, and will eventually lead to some sort of deal being brokered, that is acceptable to members.toonshola wrote: ↑28 Dec 2022, 19:13It’s all over. The union thought the strikes during Christmas would make Royal Mail fold and make a somewhat decent agreement. They didn’t and now the union don’t have a clue what to do next. If Royal Mail didn’t back down during Christmas then they never will, they are hell bent on these disastrous business wrecking changes and nothing is going to stop them.
ST is relying on everyone giving up. He'll not do a thing till the next ballot. Why would he? He's gonna see how it falls, and I bet he's banking on it being a low turnout, and, at worst, a borderline 'yes' vote.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
What now
-
Halfhappy
- Posts: 389
- Joined: 30 Jul 2021, 09:54
- Gender: Male
Re: What now
-
walthmstowman
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 25 Sep 2022, 15:17
- Gender: Male
Re: What now
This is just the thing , Royal Mail are leaving virtually their entire workforce behind . I honestly can't see their changes working . It will be one massive clusterfuck.Halfhappy wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 19:11Of course this is going to happen. ST will begin forcing his change through, this will only enrage the workforce and cause even more resistance. Everything ST has done up to now, has only served to drive a wedge further between between the CEO and the workforce. I can't see the "beat them with a stick" approach being dropped anytime soon. Implementing change requires a workforce on board to achieve any successful change. It's the staff that make it work. Honestly, just a handful of staff doing everything by the book, can bring the greatest of plans to a standstill.stevejm wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 18:05It wouldn't be a bad CWU strategy to let RM bring in some of the executive changes - enough to rile the workforce and then have a ballot when members are sufficiently angered to vote yesHalfhappy wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 16:30Right from the start it's been laid out that this will be a long drawn out dispute. The fact has never been danced around, and has been in plain sight, yet people have repeatedly chosen to insist on believing Christmas is the only leverage we have, it's not and never was. DW even said the words, "We'll strike till next Christmas." December is one month, and from RM's point of view, there's another 11 equally important ones. The only leverage we have is long-term disruption, that's is damaging to any business, in any sector. It can't be sustained, and will eventually lead to some sort of deal being brokered, that is acceptable to members.toonshola wrote: ↑28 Dec 2022, 19:13It’s all over. The union thought the strikes during Christmas would make Royal Mail fold and make a somewhat decent agreement. They didn’t and now the union don’t have a clue what to do next. If Royal Mail didn’t back down during Christmas then they never will, they are hell bent on these disastrous business wrecking changes and nothing is going to stop them.
ST is relying on everyone giving up. He'll not do a thing till the next ballot. Why would he? He's gonna see how it falls, and I bet he's banking on it being a low turnout, and, at worst, a borderline 'yes' vote.
-
curleigh
- Posts: 22
- Joined: 25 Oct 2022, 20:55
- Gender: Male
Re: What now
If these customers permanently move to other couriers due to continuing IA, what future is there for us ?? Less work more job losses!!!!Wolf91 wrote: ↑28 Dec 2022, 21:21Completely missing the point. Christmas is not as important as you think. Continued action causes distrust between RM and their customers, that’s what hits them hardest. Obviously it’s busier at Christmas but it’s generally busy all year round. If they can’t trust RM they will permanently move their business to other couriers. This is the most damaging factor for RM without a shadow of a doubt.toonshola wrote: ↑28 Dec 2022, 19:13It’s all over. The union thought the strikes during Christmas would make Royal Mail fold and make a somewhat decent agreement. They didn’t and now the union don’t have a clue what to do next. If Royal Mail didn’t back down during Christmas then they never will, they are hell bent on these disastrous business wrecking changes and nothing is going to stop them.
-
Halfhappy
- Posts: 389
- Joined: 30 Jul 2021, 09:54
- Gender: Male
Re: What now
Do you think the CEO might have that concern too? This is the leverage created by long term IA. The CEO is not immune to this threat.curleigh wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 20:47If these customers permanently move to other couriers due to continuing IA, what future is there for us ?? Less work more job losses!!!!Wolf91 wrote: ↑28 Dec 2022, 21:21Completely missing the point. Christmas is not as important as you think. Continued action causes distrust between RM and their customers, that’s what hits them hardest. Obviously it’s busier at Christmas but it’s generally busy all year round. If they can’t trust RM they will permanently move their business to other couriers. This is the most damaging factor for RM without a shadow of a doubt.toonshola wrote: ↑28 Dec 2022, 19:13It’s all over. The union thought the strikes during Christmas would make Royal Mail fold and make a somewhat decent agreement. They didn’t and now the union don’t have a clue what to do next. If Royal Mail didn’t back down during Christmas then they never will, they are hell bent on these disastrous business wrecking changes and nothing is going to stop them.
-
ICEMAN81
- Posts: 33
- Joined: 04 Dec 2020, 12:42
- Gender: Male
Re: What now
Just a rumour my rep told me a deal is on the table that we're apparently going to be balloted on
-
priority102
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 520
- Joined: 04 Aug 2009, 18:57
- Gender: Female
-
themaze
- Posts: 121
- Joined: 12 Oct 2007, 21:36
Re: What now
Not really .Halfhappy wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 21:02Do you think the CEO might have that concern too? This is the leverage created by long term IA. The CEO is not immune to this threat.curleigh wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 20:47If these customers permanently move to other couriers due to continuing IA, what future is there for us ?? Less work more job losses!!!!Wolf91 wrote: ↑28 Dec 2022, 21:21Completely missing the point. Christmas is not as important as you think. Continued action causes distrust between RM and their customers, that’s what hits them hardest. Obviously it’s busier at Christmas but it’s generally busy all year round. If they can’t trust RM they will permanently move their business to other couriers. This is the most damaging factor for RM without a shadow of a doubt.toonshola wrote: ↑28 Dec 2022, 19:13It’s all over. The union thought the strikes during Christmas would make Royal Mail fold and make a somewhat decent agreement. They didn’t and now the union don’t have a clue what to do next. If Royal Mail didn’t back down during Christmas then they never will, they are hell bent on these disastrous business wrecking changes and nothing is going to stop them.
He'll just leave and move to another company the same way he's worked for many companies before royal mail.
-
Eduardo
- Posts: 182
- Joined: 14 Sep 2016, 08:27
- Gender: Male
Re: What now
If the only way you can think of introducing changes is by threatening and intimidating your workforce then I'm sorry but you are not going to get the best from them.walthmstowman wrote:This is just the thing , Royal Mail are leaving virtually their entire workforce behind . I honestly can't see their changes working . It will be one massive clusterfuck.
If your best idea of motivating people is by watching them on CCTV and monitoring their movements by other new technologies only to be used as evidence against them in conduct cases then in this country, on this land, you are bound to fail.
English people don't do servitude well.
Under Siege
-
Clappedoutpostie
- Posts: 1235
- Joined: 05 Nov 2021, 21:46
- Gender: Male
Re: What now
And that’s where they have miscalculated all the way through. Nothing is going to work without an agreement. I would guess the board never expected members to still be standing strong 18 strike days in. At some point there has to be an agreement or the company goes out of business. My guess is at some point the board will throw Thompson under the bus, come to an agreement with the CWU and say it was all his fault. Time will tell.walthmstowman wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 19:45This is just the thing , Royal Mail are leaving virtually their entire workforce behind . I honestly can't see their changes working . It will be one massive clusterfuck.
-
Numberone63
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 621
- Joined: 05 Sep 2017, 18:38
- Gender: Male
Re: What now
It’s has all been worthwhile. Because today I got a couple of CWU pens and and brand spanking new CWU 2023 diary.
-
Eduardo
- Posts: 182
- Joined: 14 Sep 2016, 08:27
- Gender: Male
Re: What now
I mean I dread to think what will happen if the workforce is lost entirely.
Truck drivers, dock door staff, indoor processing, delivery offices.
What's the plan Simon, you're on the big bucks, tell us the long term strategy of how you're going to win the workforce back or if not win them back then what will RM's new relationship with staff be?
A master slave relationship perhaps?
I mean what?
Redlen, what would you do?
Truck drivers, dock door staff, indoor processing, delivery offices.
What's the plan Simon, you're on the big bucks, tell us the long term strategy of how you're going to win the workforce back or if not win them back then what will RM's new relationship with staff be?
A master slave relationship perhaps?
I mean what?
Redlen, what would you do?
Under Siege
-
walthmstowman
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 25 Sep 2022, 15:17
- Gender: Male
Re: What now
What management have to realise is that they can't destroy the union without destroying the company . Management also need an agreement or there will never be any peace . All this executive action and antagonising the workforce will only end up being counter productive . At some point they'll get the message but God knows when .Clappedoutpostie wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 22:24And that’s where they have miscalculated all the way through. Nothing is going to work without an agreement. I would guess the board never expected members to still be standing strong 18 strike days in. At some point there has to be an agreement or the company goes out of business. My guess is at some point the board will throw Thompson under the bus, come to an agreement with the CWU and say it was all his fault. Time will tell.walthmstowman wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 19:45This is just the thing , Royal Mail are leaving virtually their entire workforce behind . I honestly can't see their changes working . It will be one massive clusterfuck.
-
wandle
- Posts: 944
- Joined: 25 Feb 2011, 17:17
- Gender: Male
Re: What now
Except when it comes to being told to wear a totally ineffective rag across their face that stops a virus like Alex McCarthy stops a football.Eduardo wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 22:23If the only way you can think of introducing changes is by threatening and intimidating your workforce then I'm sorry but you are not going to get the best from them.walthmstowman wrote:This is just the thing , Royal Mail are leaving virtually their entire workforce behind . I honestly can't see their changes working . It will be one massive clusterfuck.
If your best idea of motivating people is by watching them on CCTV and monitoring their movements by other new technologies only to be used as evidence against them in conduct cases then in this country, on this land, you are bound to fail.
English people don't do servitude well.
But, on a lighter note, isn’t Thompson’s contract only for 2 years? He was appointed on 11th January 2021. What was the ‘period of calm’ that the CWU offered set to run until 16th January? What was/is the significance of that particular date?
https://amp.theguardian.com/business/20 ... -and-trace
-
needadvice
- MDEC
- Posts: 244
- Joined: 20 Jun 2012, 23:39
- Gender: Female
Re: What now
RM can't destroy the CWU without destroying the workforce and RM itself. An acceptable agreement for all parties is the only solution. Peace and togetherness should be the priority for any business. Why can't they just make a healthy profit each year without the race to the bottomwalthmstowman wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 23:23What management have to realise is that they can't destroy the union without destroying the company . Management also need an agreement or there will never be any peace . All this executive action and antagonising the workforce will only end up being counter productive . At some point they'll get the message but God knows when .Clappedoutpostie wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 22:24And that’s where they have miscalculated all the way through. Nothing is going to work without an agreement. I would guess the board never expected members to still be standing strong 18 strike days in. At some point there has to be an agreement or the company goes out of business. My guess is at some point the board will throw Thompson under the bus, come to an agreement with the CWU and say it was all his fault. Time will tell.walthmstowman wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 19:45This is just the thing , Royal Mail are leaving virtually their entire workforce behind . I honestly can't see their changes working . It will be one massive clusterfuck.
-
redlen
- Posts: 1331
- Joined: 21 Dec 2021, 12:05
- Gender: Male
Re: What now
The Board will simply vote and extend his contract for another two yearswandle wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 23:36Except when it comes to being told to wear a totally ineffective rag across their face that stops a virus like Alex McCarthy stops a football.Eduardo wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 22:23If the only way you can think of introducing changes is by threatening and intimidating your workforce then I'm sorry but you are not going to get the best from them.walthmstowman wrote:This is just the thing , Royal Mail are leaving virtually their entire workforce behind . I honestly can't see their changes working . It will be one massive clusterfuck.
If your best idea of motivating people is by watching them on CCTV and monitoring their movements by other new technologies only to be used as evidence against them in conduct cases then in this country, on this land, you are bound to fail.
English people don't do servitude well.
But, on a lighter note, isn’t Thompson’s contract only for 2 years? He was appointed on 11th January 2021. What was the ‘period of calm’ that the CWU offered set to run until 16th January? What was/is the significance of that particular date?
https://amp.theguardian.com/business/20 ... -and-trace