No Tracked are left, 1st class and Tracked are delivered everyday.
Even if there were to be some it would be far easier to remove them than repeat scanning every morning
No Tracked are left, 1st class and Tracked are delivered everyday.
What?SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑05 Jul 2026, 19:32The system basically needs to know that an item is going out for delivery that day and on which walk. How can the system know an item isn't going out if items aren't scanned out to a walk?yellowbelly wrote: ↑05 Jul 2026, 14:29If that's the case RM might need to think about taking out the requirement for the walk postie to 'Scan to route' the sizeable chunkSpacePhoenix wrote: ↑04 Jul 2026, 20:12Within 5-10 years I reckon a very sizeable chunk of letters and flats will be Tracked. Already MCs are sending Tracked letters and flats out in trays both between the Outward and Inward MCs and the Inward MCs to DOs.
of letters/flats that will be tracked that you refer to and automating the process somehow. Scanning individual tracked letters and flats in a 'sizeable' volume will be so inefficient.
The only way to automate the process would be to deem EVERYTHING as going out for delivery and EVERYTHING actually does go out for delivery.yellowbelly wrote: ↑06 Jul 2026, 17:01What?SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑05 Jul 2026, 19:32The system basically needs to know that an item is going out for delivery that day and on which walk. How can the system know an item isn't going out if items aren't scanned out to a walk?yellowbelly wrote: ↑05 Jul 2026, 14:29If that's the case RM might need to think about taking out the requirement for the walk postie to 'Scan to route' the sizeable chunkSpacePhoenix wrote: ↑04 Jul 2026, 20:12Within 5-10 years I reckon a very sizeable chunk of letters and flats will be Tracked. Already MCs are sending Tracked letters and flats out in trays both between the Outward and Inward MCs and the Inward MCs to DOs.
of letters/flats that will be tracked that you refer to and automating the process somehow. Scanning individual tracked letters and flats in a 'sizeable' volume will be so inefficient.
That's why I said "...automating the process somehow."
That's it, that's what I was getting at! Doesn't mean it'll actually get delivered through the letterbox though.SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑06 Jul 2026, 17:50The only way to automate the process would be to deem EVERYTHING as going out for delivery and EVERYTHING actually does go out for delivery.yellowbelly wrote: ↑06 Jul 2026, 17:01What?SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑05 Jul 2026, 19:32The system basically needs to know that an item is going out for delivery that day and on which walk. How can the system know an item isn't going out if items aren't scanned out to a walk?yellowbelly wrote: ↑05 Jul 2026, 14:29If that's the case RM might need to think about taking out the requirement for the walk postie to 'Scan to route' the sizeable chunkSpacePhoenix wrote: ↑04 Jul 2026, 20:12Within 5-10 years I reckon a very sizeable chunk of letters and flats will be Tracked. Already MCs are sending Tracked letters and flats out in trays both between the Outward and Inward MCs and the Inward MCs to DOs.
of letters/flats that will be tracked that you refer to and automating the process somehow. Scanning individual tracked letters and flats in a 'sizeable' volume will be so inefficient.
That's why I said "...automating the process somehow."
"Where is your union?" haha good joke.dazzler123 wrote: ↑13 May 2026, 15:53Dont work a minute unpaid, where is your union? If you dont mind speaking up, ask for it in writing. Watch his face turnsnort wrote: ↑12 May 2026, 23:05Anyone else have a manager phoning you up when you’re out on delivery if you miss even 1 1st class letter in the fitting (of mail you don’t take out) they make us come back to the depot to get it and if this causes us to be late finishing we have to do it in our own time unpaid! Surely this is illegal, forcing us to work unpaid? Just when you think this company can’t get any worse it does…
The time.slot is the issue, as a customer is only informed of when to expect the parcel.once it's scanned tomcore.and then confirmed, not that 99% seem.take.any notice anyway!!SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑06 Jul 2026, 17:50The only way to automate the process would be to deem EVERYTHING as going out for delivery and EVERYTHING actually does go out for delivery.yellowbelly wrote: ↑06 Jul 2026, 17:01What?SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑05 Jul 2026, 19:32The system basically needs to know that an item is going out for delivery that day and on which walk. How can the system know an item isn't going out if items aren't scanned out to a walk?yellowbelly wrote: ↑05 Jul 2026, 14:29If that's the case RM might need to think about taking out the requirement for the walk postie to 'Scan to route' the sizeable chunkSpacePhoenix wrote: ↑04 Jul 2026, 20:12Within 5-10 years I reckon a very sizeable chunk of letters and flats will be Tracked. Already MCs are sending Tracked letters and flats out in trays both between the Outward and Inward MCs and the Inward MCs to DOs.
of letters/flats that will be tracked that you refer to and automating the process somehow. Scanning individual tracked letters and flats in a 'sizeable' volume will be so inefficient.
That's why I said "...automating the process somehow."
Should be simple to do, if you are prepared to spend the money. Buy some sorting machines that sort parcels to specific York's for each York, scanning the 2d code as they go. When the York is full, print off a dpr route code with those track items on. Then, when the York gets to the office, you just need to scan the dpr code to you walk route.yellowbelly wrote: ↑05 Jul 2026, 14:29If that's the case RM might need to think about taking out the requirement for the walk postie to 'Scan to route' the sizeable chunkSpacePhoenix wrote: ↑04 Jul 2026, 20:12Within 5-10 years I reckon a very sizeable chunk of letters and flats will be Tracked. Already MCs are sending Tracked letters and flats out in trays both between the Outward and Inward MCs and the Inward MCs to DOs.
of letters/flats that will be tracked that you refer to and automating the process somehow. Scanning individual tracked letters and flats in a 'sizeable' volume will be so inefficient.
How many walks does a typical DPR cover? I think the main issue would be the space it would take up. Existing packet sorting machines in MCs can be used for inward or outward. They take up a massive amount of floor space, only the largest MCs can fit them in.Emohawk wrote: ↑22 Jul 2026, 18:12Should be simple to do, if you are prepared to spend the money. Buy some sorting machines that sort parcels to specific York's for each York, scanning the 2d code as they go. When the York is full, print off a dpr route code with those track items on. Then, when the York gets to the office, you just need to scan the dpr code to you walk route.yellowbelly wrote: ↑05 Jul 2026, 14:29If that's the case RM might need to think about taking out the requirement for the walk postie to 'Scan to route' the sizeable chunkSpacePhoenix wrote: ↑04 Jul 2026, 20:12Within 5-10 years I reckon a very sizeable chunk of letters and flats will be Tracked. Already MCs are sending Tracked letters and flats out in trays both between the Outward and Inward MCs and the Inward MCs to DOs.
of letters/flats that will be tracked that you refer to and automating the process somehow. Scanning individual tracked letters and flats in a 'sizeable' volume will be so inefficient.
When I say DPR, I simply mean assigning all the parcels for one duty to a pre loaded code. Technically, you could just use your core route number. It would save having to sort and then scan all the parcels in.SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑22 Jul 2026, 19:35How many walks does a typical DPR cover? I think the main issue would be the space it would take up. Existing packet sorting machines in MCs can be used for inward or outward. They take up a massive amount of floor space, only the largest MCs can fit them in.Emohawk wrote: ↑22 Jul 2026, 18:12Should be simple to do, if you are prepared to spend the money. Buy some sorting machines that sort parcels to specific York's for each York, scanning the 2d code as they go. When the York is full, print off a dpr route code with those track items on. Then, when the York gets to the office, you just need to scan the dpr code to you walk route.yellowbelly wrote: ↑05 Jul 2026, 14:29If that's the case RM might need to think about taking out the requirement for the walk postie to 'Scan to route' the sizeable chunkSpacePhoenix wrote: ↑04 Jul 2026, 20:12Within 5-10 years I reckon a very sizeable chunk of letters and flats will be Tracked. Already MCs are sending Tracked letters and flats out in trays both between the Outward and Inward MCs and the Inward MCs to DOs.
of letters/flats that will be tracked that you refer to and automating the process somehow. Scanning individual tracked letters and flats in a 'sizeable' volume will be so inefficient.
Had one of the 1 percent club ask me why the parcel didn't arrive within in the 4 hour window, it was 10 mins late! I told him the times are only an estimate. The public have no idea the volume of work we do each day, then again the CWU don't either.TopperGas wrote: ↑06 Jul 2026, 22:53The time.slot is the issue, as a customer is only informed of when to expect the parcel.once it's scanned tomcore.and then confirmed, not that 99% seem.take.any notice anyway!!SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑06 Jul 2026, 17:50The only way to automate the process would be to deem EVERYTHING as going out for delivery and EVERYTHING actually does go out for delivery.yellowbelly wrote: ↑06 Jul 2026, 17:01What?SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑05 Jul 2026, 19:32The system basically needs to know that an item is going out for delivery that day and on which walk. How can the system know an item isn't going out if items aren't scanned out to a walk?yellowbelly wrote: ↑05 Jul 2026, 14:29If that's the case RM might need to think about taking out the requirement for the walk postie to 'Scan to route' the sizeable chunkSpacePhoenix wrote: ↑04 Jul 2026, 20:12Within 5-10 years I reckon a very sizeable chunk of letters and flats will be Tracked. Already MCs are sending Tracked letters and flats out in trays both between the Outward and Inward MCs and the Inward MCs to DOs.
of letters/flats that will be tracked that you refer to and automating the process somehow. Scanning individual tracked letters and flats in a 'sizeable' volume will be so inefficient.
That's why I said "...automating the process somehow."
Often when I'm tracking something on Amazon's site that I'm waiting for, the delivery estimate time slot will change, why can't RM do something similar?funkflex55 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2026, 11:12Had one of the 1 percent club ask me why the parcel didn't arrive within in the 4 hour window, it was 10 mins late! I told him the times are only an estimate. The public have no idea the volume of work we do each day, then again the CWU don't either.TopperGas wrote: ↑06 Jul 2026, 22:53The time.slot is the issue, as a customer is only informed of when to expect the parcel.once it's scanned tomcore.and then confirmed, not that 99% seem.take.any notice anyway!!SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑06 Jul 2026, 17:50The only way to automate the process would be to deem EVERYTHING as going out for delivery and EVERYTHING actually does go out for delivery.yellowbelly wrote: ↑06 Jul 2026, 17:01What?SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑05 Jul 2026, 19:32The system basically needs to know that an item is going out for delivery that day and on which walk. How can the system know an item isn't going out if items aren't scanned out to a walk?yellowbelly wrote: ↑05 Jul 2026, 14:29If that's the case RM might need to think about taking out the requirement for the walk postie to 'Scan to route' the sizeable chunkSpacePhoenix wrote: ↑04 Jul 2026, 20:12Within 5-10 years I reckon a very sizeable chunk of letters and flats will be Tracked. Already MCs are sending Tracked letters and flats out in trays both between the Outward and Inward MCs and the Inward MCs to DOs.
of letters/flats that will be tracked that you refer to and automating the process somehow. Scanning individual tracked letters and flats in a 'sizeable' volume will be so inefficient.
That's why I said "...automating the process somehow."