Lincox wrote:Judgee, it is obvious you live in the land of Charles Darwin, survival of the fittest.
In a humane society, we look to a government to provide services that everyone can benefit from, provide an infrastructure of services that enable our children to be educated in order that they can eventually subscribe to the national budget. Provide affordable or rental housing in order that no one is left without shelter. Provide subsidised transport links in order that people can move around the country to carry out work, leisure or family commitments without having to break the bank to pay for it. Provide a national health service that is fit for purpose and to make sure that the workforce are fairly paid. Provide Water, Power and Sewage facilities. Make sure that ALL people make a reasonable contribution according to their circumstances to a national budget which sets out the costs on an annual basis of running all national services and industries. We cannot carry on with a system that punishes the weak, and benefits the rich or else we are no different to the animals.
Corbyns plans are bold and adventurous and will take a lot of resourcing but the idea of a race to the bottom with another five years of austerity, no plans for the future and no idea what the outcome of Brexit will bring us is a far more frightening scenario.
I am all for that and as soon as the uk finds 50 billion trillion pounds from out of thin air I'd vote for them!
Actually no I wouldn't as Diane Abbott in charge of policing just fills me with fear!
Lincox wrote:Well, at least she will have a police force to be in charge of.
Even though she was an associate of that dumb Bernie Grant who took joy in the Broadwater farm riots, and is a party colleague of those who called for MI5 and Special Branch etc to be disbanded?
Yep, I bet the police etc will take a real comfort if that disgusting hypocrite was "in charge" (although "in charge" is an obvious oxy-moron where she's concerned).
Looks like someone finally gave her the push. Too little too late. Funnier still, she has been replaced by Lyn Brown who hates Corbyn. What a shambles!
Judgee wrote:Looks like someone finally gave her the push. Too little too late. Funnier still, she has been replaced by Lyn Brown who hates Corbyn. What a shambles!
Some of us, Judgee, can act professional at work where more important matters are at hand. I trust the Labour party yo do just that.
rubberbond wrote:..the reason the pension fund is up the creek,without a paddle is because that idiot Gordon Brown,taxed the dividends of the pension funds
Rubbish. You don't know what you are talking about.
rubberbond wrote:..the reason the pension fund is up the creek,without a paddle is because that idiot Gordon Brown,taxed the dividends of the pension funds
Rubbish. You don't know what you are talking about.
rubberbond wrote:..the reason the pension fund is up the creek,without a paddle is because that idiot Gordon Brown,taxed the dividends of the pension funds
Rubbish. You don't know what you are talking about.
Judgee wrote:Looks like someone finally gave her the push. Too little too late. Funnier still, she has been replaced by Lyn Brown who hates Corbyn. What a shambles!
Some of us, Judgee, can act professional at work where more important matters are at hand. I trust the Labour party yo do just that.
Credit where credits due Kick the Bucket you do make me laugh!
rubberbond wrote:..the reason the pension fund is up the creek,without a paddle is because that idiot Gordon Brown,taxed the dividends of the pension funds
Rubbish. You don't know what you are talking about.
I believe that was to stimulate the economy by increasing cash flow, pensions wasn't specifically targeted.
Anyway, enough attempts in trying to divert attention from what happened in 1997, the decline of the final salary pension scheme, can be firmly paid at the door of labour.
Six of Nine loves Seven of Nine, together in Electric Dreams.
rubberbond wrote:..the reason the pension fund is up the creek,without a paddle is because that idiot Gordon Brown,taxed the dividends of the pension funds
Rubbish. You don't know what you are talking about.
I believe that was to stimulate the economy by increasing cash flow, pensions wasn't specifically targeted.
Anyway, enough attempts in trying to divert attention from what happened in 1997, the decline of the final salary pension scheme, can be firmly paid at the door of labour.
You didn't read the article through did you ? And if you did you didn't understand it.
Vote Labour - for the many, not the few.
This is our chance, our hope of a better future.
Voting for anyone else is a vote for more of the same old same old.
That seems to be the new Labour mantra if you don't vote for Labour you don't understand them? Perhaps like many other Labour supporters you also believe anyone who votes for other parties must be completely thick? So glad your kind are in the minority in this country. Brainwashed fools who believe in the Tooth fairy and Father Christmas!
An independent think tank recently confirmed Labours manifesto does not add up. Go on now tell me they must be getting a back hander from the Tories. Just another Labour dreamer full of hate.
People can make their own minds up and just because they don't agree with you doesn't mean they don't understand it means they just don't agree. You argue like my girlfriend with only two answers to everything your answer and the wrong answer!
Tories aren't great but they make more sense than the Labour party and even more sense than Labour voters!
