Agreed, there is something very shady going on with the union. It's odd that they are agreeing to all these changes for the worse to our working conditions. These trials seem to already be a done deal.Navalron wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 12:22I agree with you mate. How can you have people on all sorts of different terms and conditions and pay, working the same job or even hours. I know for a fact that my local DO , the new staff are working through their breaks because the older contracts have still got the job and knock in their head. So new starts at my local office are giving at least2.5 hrs per week for no pay. The union doesn't care. The cwu are no longer fit for purpose and that's got to do with most of the people at the top. And with about 40% of offices not even having a rep, that suits management very well. I just wonder if brown envelopes have been passed about to certain people. Maybe I'm wrong but surely you can't sell your workforce out like they have for no gain, or they are completely the wrong people for the job. I would say that with a new owner coming in, is EXACTLY the correct time to vote for industrial action. A work to the rules would keep the wages coming but bring RM to the table. The cwu sound more like management these days. Something needs to give. Yes things need to change but you don't need to treat your staff like s**t while doing it.tramssirhc wrote: ↑25 Mar 2025, 15:50Like I said that only applies to workers covered by the WTR. Employers can agree different arrangements as long as they meet the minimum requirement - 20 minutes, unpaid, during the working time of 6 or more hours and away from the work.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Uso trials fatigue and h&s
-
SkiSunday
- Posts: 790
- Joined: 05 Jan 2025, 18:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Uso trials fatigue and h&s
-
Valentina@1
- Posts: 794
- Joined: 13 Apr 2023, 16:48
- Gender: Male
Re: Uso trials fatigue and h&s
Think everyone can now see it clearly,this union needs to be brought to task,they completely sold outSkiSunday wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 14:45Agreed, there is something very shady going on with the union. It's odd that they are agreeing to all these changes for the worse to our working conditions. These trials seem to already be a done deal.Navalron wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 12:22I agree with you mate. How can you have people on all sorts of different terms and conditions and pay, working the same job or even hours. I know for a fact that my local DO , the new staff are working through their breaks because the older contracts have still got the job and knock in their head. So new starts at my local office are giving at least2.5 hrs per week for no pay. The union doesn't care. The cwu are no longer fit for purpose and that's got to do with most of the people at the top. And with about 40% of offices not even having a rep, that suits management very well. I just wonder if brown envelopes have been passed about to certain people. Maybe I'm wrong but surely you can't sell your workforce out like they have for no gain, or they are completely the wrong people for the job. I would say that with a new owner coming in, is EXACTLY the correct time to vote for industrial action. A work to the rules would keep the wages coming but bring RM to the table. The cwu sound more like management these days. Something needs to give. Yes things need to change but you don't need to treat your staff like s**t while doing it.tramssirhc wrote: ↑25 Mar 2025, 15:50Like I said that only applies to workers covered by the WTR. Employers can agree different arrangements as long as they meet the minimum requirement - 20 minutes, unpaid, during the working time of 6 or more hours and away from the work.