Seniority question

buntin · Post by **buntin** » 07 May 2019, 07:42

I was told its pay number too .

zipmeister · Post by **zipmeister** » 07 May 2019, 08:12

Woody Guthrie wrote:
The way forward maybe old but until another agreement replaces it, it holds the ground.
The law holds the ground. All existing agreements have to be applied using the principles of the legal framework, it even has a name. It's called Equality proofing. When reps are trained this is part of the coursework.

In the case of a seniority tie-breaker date of birth is no longer an acceptable criteria.

Somebody better retrain the senior field officials then, as I have recently been advised that the Way forward agreement is still the criteria used.

Post by **TrueBlueTerrier** » 07 May 2019, 12:06

Scama_bug wrote:What about performance ? That's not taking into consideration?

On specialist posts it is - kind of.

We don't have performance targets at OPG level.

As there is no annual assessment, no targets for OPGs, no fair way of using customer complaints as a guide, it would be down to "if your face fits". Not sure that would be popular whether run by the Rep or the Manager.