ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

management

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4276
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: management

Post by Martin Walsh »

POSTMAN wrote:dingo,the problem is so many were burned with P&M,their questions to HQ would be,why would this be any different.
Words mean nothing,we had the words in 07,the words are still there but are ignore up and down the country.

Agreements on paper mean nothing to many in management.This is the big worry.
Postman your right , talk is cheap. However if we never believed management again we would never have another national or local agreement.

I think the difference this time ( I hope ) will be that for the first time ever we will have both Roger Poole and ACAS who are independent of Royal Mail and have been involved in the negotations all the way and know what was agreed and why. This is a very good safeguard.

In addition lets be honest Royal Mail cannnot do this without the assistance of staff and the union. Equally unless the company gets in better shape this industry will continue to shed jobs , reduce terms and conditions and dirft.
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Re: management

Post by BELIAL »

talk is cheap.
No comment :chuckle

Equally unless the company gets in better shape this industry will continue to shed jobs , reduce terms and conditions and dirft.
When you say "better shape" do you mean ,make even more profit? I know how they could do that.
They could make us do more work for less reward.
they could cut lots of jobs.
How much profit will be enough profit Dingo?
Seems like you accept the principle that profit comes before people . At what point would you draw a line in the sand?
Is it any wonder folks have trouble spotting the difference between management and union officials
Bye
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: management

Post by DGP1 »

RM and CWU senior management - The Dilbert Principle :wink:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dilbert_Principle" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I know it's supposed to be satire but how many can see that in our own offices??????
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: management

Post by DirtyHarry »

dingo wrote: Equally unless the company gets in better shape this industry will continue to shed jobs , reduce terms and conditions and dirft.
This is a piss-take, right? :shock:
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Re: management

Post by BELIAL »

DirtyHarry wrote:
dingo wrote: Equally unless the company gets in better shape this industry will continue to shed jobs , reduce terms and conditions and dirft.
This is a piss-take, right? :shock:
I don't think it is. It seems like they really do believe that they have done a really good job with this deal. Looks like if you talk to management for too long you end up brainwashed, also looks like a quick rinse would work on some :crazy: What's the old saying, 'if you lay with dogs you get fleas'
Bye