They really don't compete and the market is illusory. A real market with real competition would not see the tinkering you describe. Contracts come and go but at no point do they result in the complete destruction of any of the oligopoly. Greater illustrations of the illusory market are seen in the railway and water industries. At no point was there any competition between the oligopoly of companies.postslippete wrote: ↑10 Apr 2026, 22:45tramssirhc wrote: ↑10 Apr 2026, 19:30
The postal industry is an oligopoly of a handful of large businesses. The bosses meet regularly and agree what they will do not to drive each other out of business. In a real market of competition there would be no rigging of the market and they would drive each other out of business. In place of that they seek profit by exploiting everything else that they can without completely undermining each other. In this current phase of capitalism there is no real competition which is why regulators exist, to create the illusion of a market.
The UK parcel delivery market does have a few large dominant players like RM, Evri and Amazon so this does resemble something of an oligopoly but competition absolutely exists. RM itself lost significant market share in parcels over the last decade - are you telling me that this was deliberate? That this was due to the bosses of rival companies meeting regularly and agreeing on what they will do and not do. And regulators creating the illusion of a market? It's ideological rather than factual. Even in concentrated industries, companies still compete for contracts and customers.
But regardless of Marxist ideology, the truth is that RM's operating model relies heavily on experience and stability and if that weakens due to staff leaving and a lower morale then that becomes a real operational and business issue.
The business model of every company in the postal industry is maximal profit extraction in whichever way is possible without launching an all out war against each other. The CWU thinks that the way to maximise profit is through experience, stability and diversification and the failure to do this has put Royal Mail at risk.
Nowhere in the maximalisation of profit model does experience, stability or diversification figure. It was made clear in the evidence to parliament that the data proves that what the CWU claim is untrue. The data currently shows that the targets are being met and that there is sufficient surplus capacity to maximise profit through a rationalisation of the method of delivery.
At this point you would think the CWU would change its strategy and stop colluding with the oligopoly. A real rank and file led industrial and political independent trade union would start fighting back. Until that happens what you describe as the failures which are putting the business model at risk will continue.