ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

An alternative view

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
datasaint
Posts: 1541
Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 17:19
Gender: Male

Re: An alternative view

Post by datasaint »

If the company do go into administration, what is the future Royal Mail likely to look like?

A 3 day a week USO, new contracts, different owners?
redlen
Posts: 1331
Joined: 21 Dec 2021, 12:05
Gender: Male

Re: An alternative view

Post by redlen »

The Government will have to take it on as a going concern supported by the taxpayer until they can find a new backer. Breaking up the company into smaller units such as Delivery, Mail Centre and VOC will be another alternative. But whatever happens probably loses existing terms and conditions and ends up like Amazon.

But whoever takes on the responsibility will have to satisfy the USO constraints, and that will be a major barrier for any investment opportunities

You can draw a comparison when the government took back into public ownership Rail Track. Share holders compensated and Rail Track no more.
postslippete
Posts: 4099
Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
Gender: Male

Re: An alternative view

Post by postslippete »

redlen wrote:
15 Mar 2023, 20:11
Royal Mail had to take out loans to fund the transformation process and talking telephone numbers. Just like the Government with Gilts and Bonds has been hit with inflation and interest rates, so more expensive to service those existing loans. This has to be considered by balancing the books with future liability.

The Government took on the pension black hole when privatised, so it's the taxpayer responsible for any deficit.

You cannot argue about the financials of the company being independently audited. Any discrepancies later discovered is a criminal matter.

I'm aware that the financials of this public limited company are independently audited. But I've just explained to you how company's can show a greater profit or loss on their balance sheet.

I don't deny what you said about the government taking on the pension black hole when Royal Mail was privatised either. In fact, the accounting conventions enabled the government to show the assets from the Royal Mail pension scheme as income on the government balance sheet (meaning they could be used to pay down the debt), whereas the additional liabilities are “off-balance-sheet”, so they are not added to the official national debt – even though to all intents and purposes they are.

But there's a familiar theme in all of this which I'm sure you will agree is that Royal Mail are deliberately failing the USO. They don't want it and are not prepared to keep using the profits that they are making on parcels to fund the 6 day letter service that they are contractually obliged by law to deliver.
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.
redlen
Posts: 1331
Joined: 21 Dec 2021, 12:05
Gender: Male

Re: An alternative view

Post by redlen »

Have no doubt Royal Mail is being deliberately run down to be taken back into public ownership.

The problem I have is that Ofcom is the regulator and has been silent in all of this. They enforce the USO. Why did it take a Parliamentary inquiry to raise the issue?
daveyeff
Posts: 4699
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
Gender: Male

Re: An alternative view

Post by daveyeff »

hidden agenda?
Bob Cooney
Posts: 56
Joined: 01 Sep 2021, 07:25
Gender: Male

Re: An alternative view

Post by Bob Cooney »

richietns wrote:
15 Mar 2023, 08:46
Bob Cooney wrote:
15 Mar 2023, 08:21
Once again people persuade themselves its their fault and that we have to face "economic reality " and the attacks on everybody from middle class downwards using nflation and fuel prices is not a coordinated attack but just economic reality.

That's not to say this union or any other union can mitigate/ these attacks on their own but at least know why and how your getting screwed
Of course its coordinated but be carefull Bob you will be called a conspiracy nut people like to have a rosey outlook.
Michael Parenti ( Socialist Historian ) and one of the few on the left who hasn't lost his marbles here's what he says on Conspiracy Theory :

" Conspiracy Theory is a term that's used whenever anybody ascribes conscious intent to people with power "
redlen
Posts: 1331
Joined: 21 Dec 2021, 12:05
Gender: Male

Re: An alternative view

Post by redlen »

Trouble is Michael Parenti subscribes to Marxist Ideology so cannot be objective in his conclusions.
To be objective you need to be neutral

His so called consciousness is based on his own foresight and political persuasion

Am guilty myself with peoples perception on what I am saying (ascribed Intent) and what I truly am saying. Only say what is needed at the time, anything else is mindless clutter.
Bob Cooney
Posts: 56
Joined: 01 Sep 2021, 07:25
Gender: Male

Re: An alternative view

Post by Bob Cooney »

redlen wrote:
24 Mar 2023, 11:21
Trouble is Michael Parenti subscribes to Marxist Ideology so cannot be objective in his conclusions.
To be objective you need to be neutral

His so called consciousness is based on his own foresight and political persuasion

Am guilty myself with peoples perception on what I am saying (ascribed Intent) and what I truly am saying. Only say what is needed at the time, anything else is mindless clutter.
You don't understand what he means by intent.

You beleive everything is unintended consequences

Your a dupe but will never admit it
redlen
Posts: 1331
Joined: 21 Dec 2021, 12:05
Gender: Male

Re: An alternative view

Post by redlen »

Hardly a dupe

Intent/ Mens Rea been around for a millennia, not during a temporary Marxist perspective.

Unintended consequences is causation, not intent.
Postee2
Posts: 95
Joined: 25 Jun 2020, 08:37
Gender: Male

Re: An alternative view

Post by Postee2 »

Please Martin, and the union can you say are you exploring options apart from strikes such as employment law legal action against these revision practices.
As employees none of us want Royal Mail going bust and.custoners moving away again. We've see mail increase again recently but more strikes may have terrible consequences.
Surely there are other tools in the box.
En masse legal action being one so that the courts can decide whether what Royal Mail are doing is fair and in line with employment law.
I'd appreciate a reply.
Regards.
Clappedoutpostie
Posts: 1235
Joined: 05 Nov 2021, 21:46
Gender: Male

Re: An alternative view

Post by Clappedoutpostie »

Postee2 wrote:
25 Mar 2023, 09:02
Please Martin, and the union can you say are you exploring options apart from strikes such as employment law legal action against these revision practices.
As employees none of us want Royal Mail going bust and.custoners moving away again. We've see mail increase again recently but more strikes may have terrible consequences.
Surely there are other tools in the box.
En masse legal action being one so that the courts can decide whether what Royal Mail are doing is fair and in line with employment law.
I'd appreciate a reply.
Regards.
It’s s**t or bust time (literally)
redlen
Posts: 1331
Joined: 21 Dec 2021, 12:05
Gender: Male

Re: An alternative view

Post by redlen »

Nothing Royal Mail are doing breaches employment law.
Why do you think your contract of employment is being breached?
chrisj
Posts: 1883
Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 16:24
Gender: Male

Re: An alternative view

Post by chrisj »

The Alternative view title and missive from Dingo tells me that Dave Ward and Andy Fury needs to step aside - they are a stumbling block to progress being made

The PR guy should be sacked!
chrisj
Posts: 1883
Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 16:24
Gender: Male

Re: An alternative view

Post by chrisj »

The Alternative view title and missive from Dingo tells me that Dave Ward and Andy Fury needs to step aside - they are a stumbling block to progress being made

The PR guy should be sacked!
Postee2
Posts: 95
Joined: 25 Jun 2020, 08:37
Gender: Male

Re: An alternative view

Post by Postee2 »

redlen wrote:
25 Mar 2023, 09:55
Nothing Royal Mail are doing breaches employment law.
Why do you think your contract of employment is being breached?
I'd rather get a qualified employment law expert to answer that thanks, mediated by the union. Have you seen the way the repick has been conducted. You can't tell me there aren't even grey areas that aren't potentially crossing the line there.
As you well know, law is always subjective anyway. Thanks for your input but totally unhelpful.