ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

The path we are on

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
fluxburner
Posts: 60
Joined: 13 Jan 2011, 10:39
Gender: Male

The path we are on

Post by fluxburner »

20220728_165628.jpg
Some may think I'm over-reacting, because hey it can never happen here... can it? We are on that path now in this country. Its US or THEM, it may take a lot of years, but make sure you are on the right side of history. Make a small start, stop buying the effing Daily mail, pay attention to politics, particularly the increasing use of statutory instruments to slowly but surely lessen freedom of speech and democratic rights and use your vote in a GE, tactically, if need be.
The Conservative party is gone and we now have an hard right wing populist party. You should be worried.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Babel071
Posts: 20
Joined: 31 Mar 2017, 16:31
Gender: Male

Re: The path we are on

Post by Babel071 »

"First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me"

1946
Martin Niemöller
richietns
Posts: 1085
Joined: 17 Oct 2011, 18:09
Gender: Male

Re: The path we are on

Post by richietns »

The totalitarian tip toe at work slowly take away the rights of the common working people.
Jack1960
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 333
Joined: 05 Jan 2016, 17:39
Gender: Male

Re: The path we are on

Post by Jack1960 »

Babel071 wrote:
28 Jul 2022, 23:03
"First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me"

1946
Martin Niemöller
Dont be ridiculous, why are people using this quote , we are having negotiations over changes to our working conditons , we may start two hours later , we may have do a sunday every now and again.
Millions of people under totalarian monsters , left and right . To use this quote , totally out of context , is a gross insult to the millions of victims , not a phg who may lose an allowance they havent earned for 20 years.Total 5th form nonsense .
User avatar
tomtallis
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 268
Joined: 28 Oct 2020, 09:18
Gender: Male

Re: The path we are on

Post by tomtallis »

I think they're referring to the polemic spouted by the c***s running for top tory c*** rather than the current industrial strife
Woody Guthrie
Posts: 5166
Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: The path we are on

Post by Woody Guthrie »

Dont be ridiculous, why are people using this quote
If you understood the context of the Martin Niemöller quote a little better you would know.

It's not about the existence of totalitarian states or the terrible conditions people live in but how they are created.

Slowly.
By degrees.
Attacking one section of society at a time.
Closing down any avenue for opposition.
While the people who are not affected do nothing.
Until it's their turn.

The time to stop a totalitarian regime is before it becomes one, once it does you're screwed. The trick is recognising the early signs.

Things like...
Controlling the media narrative.
Banning protests.
Outlawing strikes.
Government surveillance.
Demonising sections of society.
Blame shifting.
Manipulating the judiciary.

Those are all red flags..
Think about them.
Only dead fish follow the current
Jack1960
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 333
Joined: 05 Jan 2016, 17:39
Gender: Male

Re: The path we are on

Post by Jack1960 »

Yes i do understand it and its been used wrongly in our case
ssdd
Posts: 2053
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 22:39
Gender: Male

Re: The path we are on

Post by ssdd »

Jack1960 wrote:
30 Jul 2022, 19:28
Yes i do understand it and its been used wrongly in our case
I don't think so Jack. As Woody highlights above, our struggle ties in with greater forces at play that are also dictating other avenues in our society.

If anything, ignoring that is a greater disrespect to our forebears and the ones who fought for freedom.
Flashman_
Posts: 363
Joined: 05 Jan 2010, 00:08
Gender: Male

Re: The path we are on

Post by Flashman_ »

The Original posters comments are valid, its not disrespecting the horrors of what went before. Its about stopping it happening again. Someone once said about the banality of evil and its ease of dismissal by normal people. A study also found that about 20% of CEOs are psychopaths, which goes a long way to explain why many bosses have total indifference to normal peoples problems.
Generations of workers fought long and hard for the right to strike, and it is recognised in all democracies as being an integral part of being a democracy. So when these Tory psychopaths add even more restriction on our RIGHTS you can see the dangerous direction of travel. That same government has also already begun making laws to stop decent in general.
Jack1960
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 333
Joined: 05 Jan 2016, 17:39
Gender: Male

Re: The path we are on

Post by Jack1960 »

Thank you for replies, i do get what you say.
Dorset Plodder
Posts: 4351
Joined: 29 Apr 2009, 20:05
Gender: Male

Re: The path we are on

Post by Dorset Plodder »

Babel071 wrote:
28 Jul 2022, 23:03

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me"

1946
Martin Niemöller
:Applause The original post immediately brought this quote to mind as well Babel. With the current Political situation, as well as our Industrial one, I don't think anyone can afford to be complacent. :cuppa
Like all Wage Slaves, he had two crosses to bear: The people he worked for and the people he worked with! (Stephen Vizinczey.)
Celtic warrior
Posts: 101
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 16:23
Gender: Male

Re: The path we are on

Post by Celtic warrior »

Jack1960 wrote:
29 Jul 2022, 18:17
Babel071 wrote:
28 Jul 2022, 23:03
"First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me"

1946
Martin Niemöller
"Not a PHG who may lose an allowance they haven't earned for 20 years."

That part of your reply my friend is what the principle of the statement is about.
The PHG legacy payment doesn't affect you so you don't speak up, Maybe the TPM doesn't affect you so again no need to speak up.
New staff coming in on worse conditions and pay doesn't directly affect you so again no need to speak up ......
Until they take something from you and then it's too late as the ones on the worse conditions will then say ... doesn't affect me, and so the vicious circle continues to gather speed and the only winner is the fat cat business leaders because we didn't speak / stand up when we could,
k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

Re: The path we are on

Post by k979aaa »

Jack1960 wrote:
29 Jul 2022, 18:17
Babel071 wrote:
28 Jul 2022, 23:03
"First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me"

1946
Martin Niemöller
Dont be ridiculous, why are people using this quote , we are having negotiations over changes to our working conditons , we may start two hours later , we may have do a sunday every now and again.
Millions of people under totalarian monsters , left and right . To use this quote , totally out of context , is a gross insult to the millions of victims , not a phg who may lose an allowance they havent earned for 20 years.Total 5th form nonsense .
The principal was set by an agreement the 2001 Way Forward Agreement once an an agreement was reached should be abided by we who were here at the time changed this is the crux an agreement is such not something some toff of an investment banker has anything to do with, If this sad individual should persist in his demonisation of those who embraced change by democracy while he is proglafit with the finances of the whole business shows a disdain for the working man and woman. We as a workforce expect agreements to be upheld whatever agreement and whenever it was signed this is a portant for things to come HOW CAN WE TRUST THIS MAN!