Part time to full time agreement

[Tinoblade]

Does anybody know is there an actual agreement that states if you work full time hours consistently you're contract will at least be looked at. I've searched but couldn't find anything l. Just wanted to know what the details actually were if anyone has any insight

[Ringer21]

I'm a 35 hour contract at least for the last 5 years I've work full time hours now I'm being told to come in on my time I take it 35 hours is still classed as PT.

[yellowbelly]

Does anybody know is there an actual agreement that states if you work full time hours consistently you're contract will at least be looked at. I've searched but couldn't find anything l. Just wanted to know what the details actually were if anyone has any insight

From the Four Pillars (2018),

P/T colleagues hours will be jointly reviewed every March and September.
Where appropriate increased contracted hours will be offered to reflect the hours actually worked and planned.

[redlen]

Yet again, an ambiguous agreement from the CWU/Royal Mail

The get-out clause??

Where Appropriate

Who decides when is appropriate?

[Tinoblade]

Does anybody know is there an actual agreement that states if you work full time hours consistently you're contract will at least be looked at. I've searched but couldn't find anything l. Just wanted to know what the details actually were if anyone has any insight

From the Four Pillars (2018),

P/T colleagues hours will be jointly reviewed every March and September.
Where appropriate increased contracted hours will be offered to reflect the hours actually worked and planned.

Thanks, appreciate it

[rogersh]

Also from this link, Same information updated;


(G) The level of part time Employees’ contracted hours will be reviewed by the Company and the CWU locally on a six
monthly basis. Where appropriate, increased contracted hours will be offered to reflect the hours actually worked and
planned.


http://www.cwu.org/wp-content/uploads/2 ... y-2021.pdf

Edit; OM Area specific questions: check-in on the Pathway to Change Agreement : January Trust Check-in

"In my workplace, the revision has allowed part-time employees to progress to full-time"

Edit 2;
RMG & CWU
KEY PRINCIPLES FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT (THE PATHWAY TO CHANGE)

2.4 Job Security - Commitments and Assurances to Employees

• As part of local revision activity, where justified, through workload and better alignment of resources, there will continue to be opportunities for part time staff, who wish to do so, to increase their hours to full time employment.

[postslippete]

And the bonkers thing is that there are many part-timers who have been regularly working full-timer for the last 5 years BUT its not been deemed "appropriate" to increase their contractual hours to reflect this. What reasons could that be??

[SpacePhoenix]

And the bonkers thing is that there are many part-timers who have been regularly working full-timer for the last 5 years BUT its not been deemed "appropriate" to increase their contractual hours to reflect this. What reasons could that be??

PT being made up to FT will be offered first to the most senior PT, working down the list of PT in order of seniority

[clashcityrocker]

And the bonkers thing is that there are many part-timers who have been regularly working full-timer for the last 5 years BUT its not been deemed "appropriate" to increase their contractual hours to reflect this. What reasons could that be??

Covering (long term) sickness.
Covering maternity/paternity leave.
Covering vacancies.

[khynu]

if i only been in service for 6 months only and my girlfriend will have a baby soon i will get any paid leave?

[rogersh]

if i only been in service for 6 months only and my girlfriend will have a baby soon i will get any paid leave?

khynu, I think it may be better to post this question as a new topic or look in the blue shirts forum where a recent thread on "split maternity pay" contains information.

[postslippete]

And the bonkers thing is that there are many part-timers who have been regularly working full-timer for the last 5 years BUT its not been deemed "appropriate" to increase their contractual hours to reflect this. What reasons could that be??

Covering (long term) sickness.
Covering maternity/paternity leave.
Covering vacancies.

Very few posties are either on maternity leave or on sick leave for 5 years so I suspect many of these posties are actually covering potential full-time vacancies then