ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
royalwud
Posts: 117 Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 22:36
Location: Nottingham
Post
by royalwud » 21 Nov 2007, 20:28
O dear me
just found out from a very very good source the vote is 57%A NO VOTE SO FAR
:cfo
BELIAL
Posts: 6758 Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere
Post
by BELIAL » 21 Nov 2007, 20:32
If thats 57% of the membership then its gonna work out 98% NO allowing for non voters
lovejoy
Posts: 1255 Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 12:59
Post
by lovejoy » 21 Nov 2007, 20:46
royalwud wrote: O dear me
just found out from a very very good source the vote is 57%A NO VOTE SO FAR
:cfo
IF this was to be true mate i'd be worried as a no campaigner!!
MOST people who will vote no are passionate and will have already voted
The votes coming in late will be prodominately the weaker people who have been swayed by the short term cash around xmas time!!
DGP1
Posts: 15551 Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus
Post
by DGP1 » 21 Nov 2007, 21:14
I think I'll just wait until the official result comes out (too often have rumours been started only for the complete opposite to be true)
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
wakkono
Posts: 392 Joined: 21 May 2007, 17:14
Location: south wales valleys
Post
by wakkono » 21 Nov 2007, 21:14
rural driver south wales valleys
IWW Fellow Worker
Posts: 3644 Joined: 30 May 2007, 14:27
Gender: Male
Post
by IWW Fellow Worker » 21 Nov 2007, 21:16
wakkono wrote: 57 % not much
Better than their 43% though!
The Industrial Workers of the World. The union whose members never scab!
"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
BELIAL
Posts: 6758 Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere
Post
by BELIAL » 21 Nov 2007, 21:37
And Wankoko hardly a reason for management predicting a no vote at this early stage?
The Wee Man
Posts: 11 Joined: 17 Sep 2007, 14:08
Post
by The Wee Man » 21 Nov 2007, 21:42
Is that a bunch of straw I see you grasping Lovejoy?
lovejoy
Posts: 1255 Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 12:59
Post
by lovejoy » 21 Nov 2007, 22:04
The Wee Man wrote: Is that a bunch of straw I see you grasping Lovejoy?
No mate not at all simply an observation
IF the vote at this point was 57% (which i don't think has been leaked - likely to be another rumour) i'd say it is very likely to end up a YES
If you want a no vote then you'd already av voted by now!!
The straglers will be encouraged to vote by reminders of bribes etc!!!
wolfie citizen smith
Posts: 599 Joined: 29 Oct 2007, 20:21
Gender: Male
Location: One of many who stands strong
Post
by wolfie citizen smith » 21 Nov 2007, 22:31
tell your source that his living in cloud cocoo land mate, if we are going to believe that you must think we are mad, don't be shy get this person on here telling us how they got this info, the vote will be strong for a NO vote and i agree with my fellow comrades that anyone who was going to vote NO has already done so
anyone who believes gossip is a bigger fool than the person giving it
royalwud
Posts: 117 Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 22:36
Location: Nottingham
Post
by royalwud » 21 Nov 2007, 22:31
I AM RIGHT ABOUT THE VOTE IT IS 57% A NO AT THE MOMENT,
AND I DO KNOW MORE THAN LOVEJOY
wolfie citizen smith
Posts: 599 Joined: 29 Oct 2007, 20:21
Gender: Male
Location: One of many who stands strong
Post
by wolfie citizen smith » 21 Nov 2007, 22:44
i didn't ask about lovejoy are the pair of you fighting for votes in something, you are either from SW19 or EC1V which one is it
don't be shy tell all
Carnoustie
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 793 Joined: 31 Jan 2007, 22:00
Post
by Carnoustie » 21 Nov 2007, 22:53
wakkono wrote: 57 % not much
The number of No votes needs only exceed the number of Yes votes by
one for the agreement to be deemed as rejected, wakkono
57% is more than enough, when 50.001% will do
wolfie citizen smith
Posts: 599 Joined: 29 Oct 2007, 20:21
Gender: Male
Location: One of many who stands strong
Post
by wolfie citizen smith » 21 Nov 2007, 22:58
this is true comrade but let us wait and see what the members say and i believe they will say
and a stronge vote of NO will ring loadly throughout SW19 and EC1V
stephen500
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1458 Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 04:04
Post
by stephen500 » 22 Nov 2007, 04:48
lovejoy wrote: royalwud wrote: O dear me
just found out from a very very good source the vote is 57%A NO VOTE SO FAR
:cfo
IF this was to be true mate i'd be worried as a no campaigner!!
MOST people who will vote no are passionate and will have already voted
The votes coming in late will be prodominately the weaker people who have been swayed by the short term cash around xmas time!!
If people haven't voted by now they probally won't be voting at all and will have binned the ballot papers.