LEICESTER DOMS NAMED IN EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL CASE.

[10127023]

http://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Case reference number 2601066/17


Ex Royal Mail manager verses Leicester Royal Mail DOMS

Its a very long interesting read, particularly The Judges Finding Of Facts Section.
Naming & shaming Leicester Doms.
Doms in tears, Doms with Mental stress & Doms hailed HAS CLEARLY FAILING MANAGERS!!!

The 10 page document is in the public domain at the mentioned website top of page & is free to view, print, download & share has many times as you wish.

[unome]

Et tu, Brute?

[work]

Night of the long knives, for sure: bullying masquerading as management, management cooking up a stink to discredit, nobbling of witnesses, grown adults reduced to tears, shouting at each other, cwu jumping on board to close ranks...the ins/outs of micromanaging, huh? Still they all got a payrise/bonus this christmas...hey, Mr Sweet...please learn from all this...just do the job properly as policy dictates and with the best intentions people will respect you and do the same.

[General Mannerheim]

This is why most Employment judges are total knobheads who believe everything Royal Mail tells them.

This case is very much about the fine dividing line between firm management in an environment that clearly expected results and overstepping the mark so as to display bullying/harassment. I do not have to rehearse Royal Mail policies, they are first-rate in their coverage as such things as zero tolerance for bullying; hence the bullying and harassment procedure and its interface to the conduct policy, which is the same as a disciplinary policy. This policy cannot be faulted. It provides a very thorough series of checks and balances in terms of the integrity of any investigative process.

Zero Tolerance
First rate policies No they are a bag of shite.