ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Rumour mill-van share not cost effective
-
Supermac0151
- Posts: 72
- Joined: 11 Apr 2015, 08:28
- Gender: Male
Rumour mill-van share not cost effective
So with all these changes the rumour mill is gathering pace again! One I’ve heard lately is this Rico guy doesn’t think vanshare is cost effective anymore, what that means I don’t know?? Bikes again? E-trikes on the horizon, hcts and bikes mixed dependant on distance from office? It’s funny that it’s been tabled to our union that we are going to make parcel duties up for the size3 and 4 parcels and absorb more Walking it’s like going back to one of the old methods....any thoughts anyone more in the know shed any light??
-
Rommagic
- Posts: 1518
- Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 16:52
Rumour mill-van share not cost effective
Sink this thread and wait until the 22nd may.
-
Supermac0151
- Posts: 72
- Joined: 11 Apr 2015, 08:28
- Gender: Male
Rumour mill-van share not cost effective
Is that when his announcement is then??
-
noggin1969
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: 13 Oct 2009, 17:28
- Gender: Male
Rumour mill-van share not cost effective
Nothing new under the sun , this company has always gone round in circles.
-
worktotime
- Posts: 2866
- Joined: 14 May 2010, 20:47
- Gender: Male
Rumour mill-van share not cost effective
to be honest does anyone care anymore as its the same s**t but a different leader , the company just goes round in circles like always , but they can do what they want but we all still have a finish time regardless what great ideas they come up with .
-
gary1975
- Posts: 482
- Joined: 16 Apr 2011, 13:41
- Gender: Male
Rumour mill-van share not cost effective
Van share us shite anyway
-
themailman
- Posts: 399
- Joined: 09 Jun 2010, 21:05
- Gender: Male
Rumour mill-van share not cost effective
I actually agree with him.
-
daveyeff
- Posts: 4699
- Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
- Gender: Male
Rumour mill-van share not cost effective
if they go round in circles then i'm all for starting at 5.15 am again, sorting till 6.00 prepping your duty till 6.45 and on the street for 7.00am. back at 9.45, break till 10.30, sorting again/prep till 11.00. back out on street till 11.45.....home/bar/bed/wotever. suits me.

-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 12194
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Rumour mill-van share not cost effective
Not a chance in hell of that happening. The work doesn't arrive in MCs early enough. If anything many in deliveries will end up being 09:00-17:00 or even 10:00-18:00daveyeff wrote:if they go round in circles then i'm all for starting at 5.15 am again, sorting till 6.00 prepping your duty till 6.45 and on the street for 7.00am. back at 9.45, break till 10.30, sorting again/prep till 11.00. back out on street till 11.45.....home/bar/bed/wotever. suits me.![]()
-
rubberbond
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: 24 Aug 2014, 16:03
- Gender: Male
Rumour mill-van share not cost effective
Don't be so quick to dismiss the notion , it will come back , just not in the guise that you think. Look at LAT deliveries,is that not a form of second delivery for example.SpacePhoenix wrote:Not a chance in hell of that happening. The work doesn't arrive in MCs early enough. If anything many in deliveries will end up being 09:00-17:00 or even 10:00-18:00daveyeff wrote:if they go round in circles then i'm all for starting at 5.15 am again, sorting till 6.00 prepping your duty till 6.45 and on the street for 7.00am. back at 9.45, break till 10.30, sorting again/prep till 11.00. back out on street till 11.45.....home/bar/bed/wotever. suits me.![]()
-
rubberbond
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: 24 Aug 2014, 16:03
- Gender: Male
Rumour mill-van share not cost effective
What's not to like?daveyeff wrote:if they go round in circles then i'm all for starting at 5.15 am again, sorting till 6.00 prepping your duty till 6.45 and on the street for 7.00am. back at 9.45, break till 10.30, sorting again/prep till 11.00. back out on street till 11.45.....home/bar/bed/wotever. suits me.![]()
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 12194
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Rumour mill-van share not cost effective
If they push most deliveries back to either 09:00-17:00 or 10:00-18:00 then they could have the LAT delivered as part of the normal workloadrubberbond wrote:Don't be so quick to dismiss the notion , it will come back , just not in the guise that you think. Look at LAT deliveries,is that not a form of second delivery for example.SpacePhoenix wrote:Not a chance in hell of that happening. The work doesn't arrive in MCs early enough. If anything many in deliveries will end up being 09:00-17:00 or even 10:00-18:00daveyeff wrote:if they go round in circles then i'm all for starting at 5.15 am again, sorting till 6.00 prepping your duty till 6.45 and on the street for 7.00am. back at 9.45, break till 10.30, sorting again/prep till 11.00. back out on street till 11.45.....home/bar/bed/wotever. suits me.![]()
-
rambo1
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: 12 Jun 2013, 20:00
- Gender: Male
Rumour mill-van share not cost effective
Paying for a van and all that goes with it. Mostly to do 10 miles or less a day. Working to the pace of the slowest person. Of course it's inefficient. Could have told you that ten years ago.
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 12194
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Rumour mill-van share not cost effective
There can't be that many old the old bag drop boxes left. The nearest one to me rusted away years ago
-
Brandy
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 729
- Joined: 12 Sep 2011, 21:03
- Gender: Female
Rumour mill-van share not cost effective
How long before they start calling it Consignia again?noggin1969 wrote:Nothing new under the sun , this company has always gone round in circles.