ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Rumour mill-van share not cost effective

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
Supermac0151
Posts: 72
Joined: 11 Apr 2015, 08:28
Gender: Male

Rumour mill-van share not cost effective

Post by Supermac0151 »

So with all these changes the rumour mill is gathering pace again! One I’ve heard lately is this Rico guy doesn’t think vanshare is cost effective anymore, what that means I don’t know?? Bikes again? E-trikes on the horizon, hcts and bikes mixed dependant on distance from office? It’s funny that it’s been tabled to our union that we are going to make parcel duties up for the size3 and 4 parcels and absorb more Walking it’s like going back to one of the old methods....any thoughts anyone more in the know shed any light??
Rommagic
Posts: 1518
Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 16:52

Rumour mill-van share not cost effective

Post by Rommagic »

Sink this thread and wait until the 22nd may.
Supermac0151
Posts: 72
Joined: 11 Apr 2015, 08:28
Gender: Male

Rumour mill-van share not cost effective

Post by Supermac0151 »

Is that when his announcement is then??
noggin1969
Posts: 1321
Joined: 13 Oct 2009, 17:28
Gender: Male

Rumour mill-van share not cost effective

Post by noggin1969 »

Nothing new under the sun , this company has always gone round in circles.
worktotime
Posts: 2866
Joined: 14 May 2010, 20:47
Gender: Male

Rumour mill-van share not cost effective

Post by worktotime »

to be honest does anyone care anymore as its the same s**t but a different leader , the company just goes round in circles like always , but they can do what they want but we all still have a finish time regardless what great ideas they come up with .
gary1975
Posts: 482
Joined: 16 Apr 2011, 13:41
Gender: Male

Rumour mill-van share not cost effective

Post by gary1975 »

Van share us shite anyway
themailman
Posts: 399
Joined: 09 Jun 2010, 21:05
Gender: Male

Rumour mill-van share not cost effective

Post by themailman »

I actually agree with him.
daveyeff
Posts: 4699
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
Gender: Male

Rumour mill-van share not cost effective

Post by daveyeff »

if they go round in circles then i'm all for starting at 5.15 am again, sorting till 6.00 prepping your duty till 6.45 and on the street for 7.00am. back at 9.45, break till 10.30, sorting again/prep till 11.00. back out on street till 11.45.....home/bar/bed/wotever. suits me. :Very Happy :Very Happy
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 12194
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Rumour mill-van share not cost effective

Post by SpacePhoenix »

daveyeff wrote:if they go round in circles then i'm all for starting at 5.15 am again, sorting till 6.00 prepping your duty till 6.45 and on the street for 7.00am. back at 9.45, break till 10.30, sorting again/prep till 11.00. back out on street till 11.45.....home/bar/bed/wotever. suits me. :Very Happy :Very Happy
Not a chance in hell of that happening. The work doesn't arrive in MCs early enough. If anything many in deliveries will end up being 09:00-17:00 or even 10:00-18:00
rubberbond
Posts: 1497
Joined: 24 Aug 2014, 16:03
Gender: Male

Rumour mill-van share not cost effective

Post by rubberbond »

SpacePhoenix wrote:
daveyeff wrote:if they go round in circles then i'm all for starting at 5.15 am again, sorting till 6.00 prepping your duty till 6.45 and on the street for 7.00am. back at 9.45, break till 10.30, sorting again/prep till 11.00. back out on street till 11.45.....home/bar/bed/wotever. suits me. :Very Happy :Very Happy
Not a chance in hell of that happening. The work doesn't arrive in MCs early enough. If anything many in deliveries will end up being 09:00-17:00 or even 10:00-18:00
Don't be so quick to dismiss the notion , it will come back , just not in the guise that you think. Look at LAT deliveries,is that not a form of second delivery for example.
rubberbond
Posts: 1497
Joined: 24 Aug 2014, 16:03
Gender: Male

Rumour mill-van share not cost effective

Post by rubberbond »

daveyeff wrote:if they go round in circles then i'm all for starting at 5.15 am again, sorting till 6.00 prepping your duty till 6.45 and on the street for 7.00am. back at 9.45, break till 10.30, sorting again/prep till 11.00. back out on street till 11.45.....home/bar/bed/wotever. suits me. :Very Happy :Very Happy
What's not to like?
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 12194
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Rumour mill-van share not cost effective

Post by SpacePhoenix »

rubberbond wrote:
SpacePhoenix wrote:
daveyeff wrote:if they go round in circles then i'm all for starting at 5.15 am again, sorting till 6.00 prepping your duty till 6.45 and on the street for 7.00am. back at 9.45, break till 10.30, sorting again/prep till 11.00. back out on street till 11.45.....home/bar/bed/wotever. suits me. :Very Happy :Very Happy
Not a chance in hell of that happening. The work doesn't arrive in MCs early enough. If anything many in deliveries will end up being 09:00-17:00 or even 10:00-18:00
Don't be so quick to dismiss the notion , it will come back , just not in the guise that you think. Look at LAT deliveries,is that not a form of second delivery for example.
If they push most deliveries back to either 09:00-17:00 or 10:00-18:00 then they could have the LAT delivered as part of the normal workload
rambo1
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3266
Joined: 12 Jun 2013, 20:00
Gender: Male

Rumour mill-van share not cost effective

Post by rambo1 »

Paying for a van and all that goes with it. Mostly to do 10 miles or less a day. Working to the pace of the slowest person. Of course it's inefficient. Could have told you that ten years ago.
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 12194
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Rumour mill-van share not cost effective

Post by SpacePhoenix »

There can't be that many old the old bag drop boxes left. The nearest one to me rusted away years ago
Brandy
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 729
Joined: 12 Sep 2011, 21:03
Gender: Female

Rumour mill-van share not cost effective

Post by Brandy »

noggin1969 wrote:Nothing new under the sun , this company has always gone round in circles.
How long before they start calling it Consignia again? :crazy: