ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Work related stress
-
WRIGHT88
- Posts: 31
- Joined: 16 Mar 2018, 09:00
- Gender: Male
Work related stress
If I go doctors with work related stress and get signed off can I still be issued a stage warning
-
tommyrep
- Posts: 561
- Joined: 28 Feb 2012, 21:57
- Gender: Male
Work related stress
YesWRIGHT88 wrote:If I go doctors with work related stress and get signed off can I still be issued a stage warning
-
worktotime
- Posts: 2865
- Joined: 14 May 2010, 20:47
- Gender: Male
Work related stress
they will try , but if its down to them then NO it wont be issued 
-
Chalky13
- Posts: 155
- Joined: 10 Nov 2018, 05:29
- Gender: Male
Work related stress
You should find, as soon as you’re off with stress, any company won’t push things.WRIGHT88 wrote:If I go doctors with work related stress and get signed off can I still be issued a stage warning
RM may well try, but as soon as you mention ACAS or legal advice, they’ll back right off.
True stress and depression are killers and can’t be treated as an excuse to give stage warnings.
-
General Mannerheim
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 13:10
- Gender: Male
- Location: Stalag 17
Work related stress
They will issue it.
"it's not that we don't think the illness was genuine, it is the amount of time you've had off and you have failed to stay within the attendance procedure guidelines as agreed with the union."
"it's not that we don't think the illness was genuine, it is the amount of time you've had off and you have failed to stay within the attendance procedure guidelines as agreed with the union."
Royal Mail managers.....about as popular as a t.urd in a swimming pool!
The DDA/Equality Act demands action,NOT words......adjustments NOT Occupational Health referrals.Case No:2505901/09
Royal Mail is an Equal Opportunities Employer..It discriminates against everybody.
The DDA/Equality Act demands action,NOT words......adjustments NOT Occupational Health referrals.Case No:2505901/09
Royal Mail is an Equal Opportunities Employer..It discriminates against everybody.
-
Creditshampoo
- Posts: 1189
- Joined: 06 Oct 2014, 19:48
- Gender: Male
Work related stress
Agreed. They literally won’t careGeneral Mannerheim wrote:They will issue it.
"it's not that we don't think the illness was genuine, it is the amount of time you've had off and you have failed to stay within the attendance procedure guidelines as agreed with the union."
-
tommyrep
- Posts: 561
- Joined: 28 Feb 2012, 21:57
- Gender: Male
Work related stress
First and second issues are not appealable !worktotime wrote:they will try , but if its down to them then NO it wont be issued
Only at the 3rd stage can steps be taken to contest the 1st/2nd stages.
It’s wrong, but that’s the case with RM. always remember the issue of 1st stage is “ supposed” to be at the DOMs discretion!
Having said that, normally over ridden by their superiors, DOMs follow their lead in my experience.
-
tommyrep
- Posts: 561
- Joined: 28 Feb 2012, 21:57
- Gender: Male
Work related stress
You are mistaken if you consider RM to be a fair or compassionate employer on this issue !Chalky13 wrote:You should find, as soon as you’re off with stress, any company won’t push things.WRIGHT88 wrote:If I go doctors with work related stress and get signed off can I still be issued a stage warning
RM may well try, but as soon as you mention ACAS or legal advice, they’ll back right off.
True stress and depression are killers and can’t be treated as an excuse to give stage warnings.
Trust me, they only pay lip service to any duty of care and issue stages regardless of the reason.
If it looks like a long term problem to them, they will go the unfit for work route.
-
Chalky13
- Posts: 155
- Joined: 10 Nov 2018, 05:29
- Gender: Male
Work related stress
I don’t consider RM fair and compassionate. However, if you’re off with stress or depression as diagnosed medically, not just your own call, they’ll be on very dodgy grounds to remove you. A tribunal will back you
-
cantonkid1955
- PARCELFORCE
- Posts: 163
- Joined: 19 Jun 2011, 19:03
- Gender: Male
Work related stress
tommyrep wrote:First and second issues are not appealable !worktotime wrote:they will try , but if its down to them then NO it wont be issued
Only at the 3rd stage can steps be taken to contest the 1st/2nd stages.
It’s wrong, but that’s the case with RM. always remember the issue of 1st stage is “ supposed” to be at the DOMs discretion!
Having said that, normally over ridden by their superiors, DOMs follow their lead in my experience.
,,When I tripped over a kerb and fell over splitting my elbow and rolled it in dog mess,,my arm became poisoned and I was sick for 4 weeks,,on my return to work,the DOM tried to issue me with a stage one,,I asked him if it was at his discretion,,he confirmed that it was,,I suggested that as the issue of this warning was discretional,that perhaps,he didn't believe me ,when I said that I had a poisoned arm,,he then suggested that he was issuing the warning because I had refused to come in for a face to face interview,,I again mentioned that since I had a poisoned arm which was in a sling,I was completely unable to drive and my suggestiuon that it was they who should visit me,was met with the response of,,we don't have the time for that,,I refused to accept their kind offer of a discretional stage one,,since I belive that,,once a member has accepted it,,with no grounds of appeal,,then they only have themselves to blame,,refuse to accept it,,and the ball is firmly back in their court,,they cannot force you to accept a warning which is unappealable...then the blame culture started,,the DOM went out and took pics of the kerb,,weather conditions ect,,it was when I showed him the condition of my footwear that he then suggested it was my fault for wearing shoes in such poor condition,,I replied that since my order for new footwear had been placed 3 months earlier and still had to be authorised by him,,he was technically to blame,,there is no accountability for stupidity.
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 12142
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Work related stress
If PF is the same as RM for ordering uniform then the DOM can't authorise it, it would have to be done by a regional manager who has the power to edit or cancel uniform orderscantonkid1955 wrote:it was when I showed him the condition of my footwear that he then suggested it was my fault for wearing shoes in such poor condition,,I replied that since my order for new footwear had been placed 3 months earlier and still had to be authorised by him,,he was technically to blame,,there is no accountability for stupidity.
-
tommyrep
- Posts: 561
- Joined: 28 Feb 2012, 21:57
- Gender: Male
Work related stress
At any tribunal stage they would be laughed out the park ! No sensible or reasonable thinking person - tribunal panel - would construe a stress related problem as being worthy of any stage warnings. RM would probably realise that before a case goes to ant tribunal. That apart, it does not prevent them trying to pressurise further, people with stress problems. Trust me I am well aware of the way they approach stage warnings. Unfortunately our union are not so much up to speed in dealing with this absurd policy adopted by RM, their view is “ we will deal with that at any stage 3 interview” assuming it will be rescinded. Meantime the stress levels increase on the person suffering work related stress. It’s a disgrace and RM management are allowed carry on with a HR system that our union should be ashamed off allowing or being party too.Chalky13 wrote:I don’t consider RM fair and compassionate. However, if you’re off with stress or depression as diagnosed medically, not just your own call, they’ll be on very dodgy grounds to remove you. A tribunal will back you
-
Chalky13
- Posts: 155
- Joined: 10 Nov 2018, 05:29
- Gender: Male
Work related stress
As above, I do find RM are archaic in their management styles and HR support, having worked in a professiona business for 18years.
RM still seems to be rooted firmly in the ‘80s and have an outlook to match. Whilst they get away with It at a DO level, or at least try to, if it went further to acas or tribunal, they’d be a laughing stock.
Stress is very much an area they would not get away with issuing, or maintaining at least, any stage warnings.
RM still seems to be rooted firmly in the ‘80s and have an outlook to match. Whilst they get away with It at a DO level, or at least try to, if it went further to acas or tribunal, they’d be a laughing stock.
Stress is very much an area they would not get away with issuing, or maintaining at least, any stage warnings.