ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

management figures.

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
daveyeff
Posts: 4699
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
Gender: Male

management figures.

Post by daveyeff »

there's been a recent influx of new managers starting in the business from outside of Royal Mail lately. they are completely new and have little or no experience of how the job is run, and are there to cover rest day relief or annual leave for DOMs and linos. anyhow, we've had one in our office for a few months now, covering for the DOM. He's just handed in his resignation after his very short employment. Why?...well, he was talking to me and a few of the lads, and he says he's had enough of senior managements lies. he says the sector manager was telling him to give lower figures for the actual workloads that was in.!! he says at times, he did do it. i.e when there wasn't much difference between the actual workload and the figure he was told to put out. for instance..45000 items of mail, they might comfortably get away with saying there was only 41000. (just below the model week) in order to be able to put lapsing on. but many other times he says was under protest. some days when they had much higher than model week but wanted lapsing on he was told to say a much lower figure. for instance 50000 items but told to say 41500. he says when he objected by saying those figures could not be justified against the days workload, he was told to ''put them in anyway''. He's walked away from the job after only 4 months. it makes you wonder, is this sort of thing going on nationally? and if so, how much are they undercounting by on a countrywide basis?.. we all said we knew they had to be lying about their figures but ffs. surely this will all come out in the wash.
osgoody1970
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 360
Joined: 21 Jun 2011, 13:44
Gender: Male

management figures.

Post by osgoody1970 »

it must go on in every delivery office!!! these AREA DELIVERY MANAGERS are a bad lot and generally are hard barstads, I never did meet a decent one!!!
hero22
Posts: 593
Joined: 21 Mar 2016, 19:48
Gender: Male

management figures.

Post by hero22 »

Why is union allowing this ?
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16700
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

management figures.

Post by clashcityrocker »

Maybe he was just telling you what you wanted to hear.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
Brandy
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 729
Joined: 12 Sep 2011, 21:03
Gender: Female

management figures.

Post by Brandy »

Nothing changes then! ;liar ;liar ;liar ;liar ;liar ;liar ;liar ;liar ;liar ;liar ;liar ;liar ;liar ;liar ;liar
rambo1
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3266
Joined: 12 Jun 2013, 20:00
Gender: Male

management figures.

Post by rambo1 »

osgoody1970 wrote:it must go on in every delivery office!!! these AREA DELIVERY MANAGERS are a bad lot and generally are hard barstads, I never did meet a decent one!!!
Exactly. We think the linos bully posties ( which undoubtedly they sometimes do) , the real bullies are the area managers, they bully the Dom, who bullies the linos etc...... good on him for not having it and leaving, but would have been better to have the balls to stay and say no. Easy said than done though.
yubin282
Posts: 993
Joined: 25 Jul 2014, 19:18
Gender: Male

management figures.

Post by yubin282 »

There was a new manager in our office about 2 months ago, university graduate by my guess. Lasted less than 3 weeks they witnessed the DOM's "man management skills" in action when a colleague tried to hand back lapsing, never saw them again left RM all together.
daveyeff
Posts: 4699
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
Gender: Male

management figures.

Post by daveyeff »

clashcityrocker wrote:Maybe he was just telling you what you wanted to hear.
he wouldn't have known what I wanted to hear. he just came over after he heard us talking about a long term gaffer going back to being a postie, and then he just came out with it. I am like a lot on here, very cynical of management. but why would he come out with a statement like that.? makes you think.
30+YEARMAN
Posts: 253
Joined: 25 Nov 2010, 17:46
Gender: Male

management figures.

Post by 30+YEARMAN »

This has been going on for ages.They are just a load of Scumbag spivs that need to be got rid of as soon a possible. :no no :no no :no no :no no :no no
Brandy
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 729
Joined: 12 Sep 2011, 21:03
Gender: Female

management figures.

Post by Brandy »

30+YEARMAN wrote:This has been going on for ages.They are just a load of Scumbag spivs that need to be got rid of as soon a possible. :no no :no no :no no :no no :no no
There would be no one left as most managers and those above them are so corrupt :no no
Brandy
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 729
Joined: 12 Sep 2011, 21:03
Gender: Female

management figures.

Post by Brandy »

lcook282 wrote:There was a new manager in our office about 2 months ago, university graduate by my guess. Lasted less than 3 weeks they witnessed the DOM's "man management skills" in action when a colleague tried to hand back lapsing, never saw them again left RM all together.
He must have been a decent person
Brandy
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 729
Joined: 12 Sep 2011, 21:03
Gender: Female

management figures.

Post by Brandy »

Brandy wrote:
lcook282 wrote:There was a new manager in our office about 2 months ago, university graduate by my guess. Lasted less than 3 weeks they witnessed the DOM's "man management skills" in action when a colleague tried to hand back lapsing, never saw them again left RM all together.
He must have been a decent person
Oops meant to say they,not he!
2Shedz
Posts: 50
Joined: 28 Dec 2017, 08:45
Gender: Male

management figures.

Post by 2Shedz »

Maybe he should have said to them dishonesty is a disciplinary offence under RMs conduct code.Good on him though for standing his ground.
Brandy
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 729
Joined: 12 Sep 2011, 21:03
Gender: Female

management figures.

Post by Brandy »

2Shedz wrote:Maybe he should have said to them dishonesty is a disciplinary offence under RMs conduct code.Good on him though for standing his ground.
It seems as though dishonesty is not an offence amongst the management and those above in RM.What an utter disgrace.
2Shedz
Posts: 50
Joined: 28 Dec 2017, 08:45
Gender: Male

management figures.

Post by 2Shedz »

Yep

Like its an offence with wilful delay of the mail for a postie but not a manager

Roll on retirement.Had enough of the job and this corrupt company

Smiffy