ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
VIDEO 5 - FINAL MESSAGE - WE CAUGHT UP WITH TERRY PULLINGER AND ROYAL MAIL'S SUE WHALLEY
-
POSTMAN
- SITE ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 32760
- Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
- Gender: Male
VIDEO 5 - FINAL MESSAGE - WE CAUGHT UP WITH TERRY PULLINGER AND ROYAL MAIL'S SUE WHALLEY
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
-
enskied
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 16 Aug 2013, 17:14
- Gender: Male
VIDEO 5 - FINAL MESSAGE - WE CAUGHT UP WITH TERRY PULLINGER AND ROYAL MAIL'S SUE WHALLEY
" The touchstones are there, they are in the agreement they're between the lines of the agreement."
Thanks for that then Terry.
So management and us have to still read " between" the lines then.
Useless springs to mind.
Thanks for that then Terry.
So management and us have to still read " between" the lines then.
Useless springs to mind.
-
tommyrep
- Posts: 561
- Joined: 28 Feb 2012, 21:57
- Gender: Male
VIDEO 5 - FINAL MESSAGE - WE CAUGHT UP WITH TERRY PULLINGER AND ROYAL MAIL'S SUE WHALLEY
Only more loop holes, open to interpretation for RM management to exploit divide and conquer. Then bully, harass and intimidate unchallenged and free from accountability.enskied wrote:" The touchstones are there, they are in the agreement they're between the lines of the agreement."
Thanks for that then Terry.
So management and us have to still read " between" the lines then.
Useless springs to mind.
The agreements made with the CWU are never water tight and the posties get shafted as per usual.
-
BELIAL
- Posts: 6758
- Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
- Gender: Female
- Location: Nowhere
VIDEO 5 - FINAL MESSAGE - WE CAUGHT UP WITH TERRY PULLINGER AND ROYAL MAIL'S SUE WHALLEY
What planet are these' people ' from?
Bye
-
redneck
- Posts: 788
- Joined: 04 Jan 2010, 20:28
- Gender: Male
VIDEO 5 - FINAL MESSAGE - WE CAUGHT UP WITH TERRY PULLINGER AND ROYAL MAIL'S SUE WHALLEY
Still can't believe people voted 9 -1 for this claptrap
-
tommyrep
- Posts: 561
- Joined: 28 Feb 2012, 21:57
- Gender: Male
VIDEO 5 - FINAL MESSAGE - WE CAUGHT UP WITH TERRY PULLINGER AND ROYAL MAIL'S SUE WHALLEY
Yeh, never knew there were so many easily conned, delusional colleagues.redneck wrote:Still can't believe people voted 9 -1 for this claptrap
No foresight or real thought made before putting a cross on a piece of paper.
Nine to one ?, unbelievable !
-
Navalron
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 1044
- Joined: 12 Aug 2017, 10:40
- Gender: Male
- Location: Glasgow
VIDEO 5 - FINAL MESSAGE - WE CAUGHT UP WITH TERRY PULLINGER AND ROYAL MAIL'S SUE WHALLEY
Maybe it's time to start a new union. At least one that has some balls and doesn't bend over and take it from RM on a daily basis. Do these people really believe the carp that they are saying.
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72671
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
VIDEO 5 - FINAL MESSAGE - WE CAUGHT UP WITH TERRY PULLINGER AND ROYAL MAIL'S SUE WHALLEY
To be frank I think there are very few easily conned or delusional posties at Royal Mail. However, there are plenty of poorly informed ones who didn't have the foresight to actually read the agreement before they voted, and even worse I think that the campaign to get a large yes vote by the Union gave a false sense of security to those who had no intention of reading it.tommyrep wrote:Yeh, never knew there were so many easily conned, delusional colleagues.redneck wrote:Still can't believe people voted 9 -1 for this claptrap
No foresight or real thought made before putting a cross on a piece of paper.
Nine to one ?, unbelievable !
There are some who read it, none of which in my estimation are happy with everything in the new agreement, but from an informed position they honestly believe that on balance the agreement was good enough to vote yes.
In the end, those who read the agreement and whether they voted yes, no or decided not to vote, at least they informed themselves and made a decision. But if you voted Yes, No or Not at all without even reading the agreement then I can only question why such people bask in the glory of ignorance. Ignorance of the agreement will only help management not you, and at least you can smell the bullcrap if you keep yourself informed.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
fb1969
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 1693
- Joined: 29 Aug 2012, 08:38
- Gender: Male
- Location: hiding on the backstreets
VIDEO 5 - FINAL MESSAGE - WE CAUGHT UP WITH TERRY PULLINGER AND ROYAL MAIL'S SUE WHALLEY
Our rep said "voting yes is a no brainer. There are loads of good things in it and from October we work an hour less". No idea how my office voted, but I doubt many read a thing and went with what the rep said!TrueBlueTerrier wrote: even worse I think that the campaign to get a large yes vote by the Union gave a false sense of security to those who had no intention of reading it.
Royal Mail
failing the workforce, failing the public and deliberately failing mail on a daily basis for too many years.
failing the workforce, failing the public and deliberately failing mail on a daily basis for too many years.
-
enskied
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 16 Aug 2013, 17:14
- Gender: Male
VIDEO 5 - FINAL MESSAGE - WE CAUGHT UP WITH TERRY PULLINGER AND ROYAL MAIL'S SUE WHALLEY
The Area Reps came to ours with two days to vote.
Wonderful pension... but needs legislation, we will get it trust us.
You on delivery have it hard, far harder than the rest of the chain.
So, if that's true why is it not reflected in our pay packet?
We work harder.
Show me the money.
Wonderful pension... but needs legislation, we will get it trust us.
You on delivery have it hard, far harder than the rest of the chain.
So, if that's true why is it not reflected in our pay packet?
We work harder.
Show me the money.
-
tommyrep
- Posts: 561
- Joined: 28 Feb 2012, 21:57
- Gender: Male
VIDEO 5 - FINAL MESSAGE - WE CAUGHT UP WITH TERRY PULLINGER AND ROYAL MAIL'S SUE WHALLEY
On the basis you have mentioned, given the size of the numbers voting yes compared to those voting no, I firmly believe that very few actually read or understood the offer. Many have voted on the back of Union advice. Many had the view of getting back money as being more important than the true detail of the deal, which is far from being clear or guaranteed. So on that basis many have been conned, by that I mean the deal was portrayed as a being a winner, and it most certainly isn’t. Deluded ! many think it the deal of the century, that all is sorted and we have a bright rosy future in retirement and it most certainly isn’t.TrueBlueTerrier wrote:To be frank I think there are very few easily conned or delusional posties at Royal Mail. However, there are plenty of poorly informed ones who didn't have the foresight to actually read the agreement before they voted, and even worse I think that the campaign to get a large yes vote by the Union gave a false sense of security to those who had no intention of reading it.tommyrep wrote:Yeh, never knew there were so many easily conned, delusional colleagues.redneck wrote:Still can't believe people voted 9 -1 for this claptrap
No foresight or real thought made before putting a cross on a piece of paper.
Nine to one ?, unbelievable !
There are some who read it, none of which in my estimation are happy with everything in the new agreement, but from an informed position they honestly believe that on balance the agreement was good enough to vote yes.
In the end, those who read the agreement and whether they voted yes, no or decided not to vote, at least they informed themselves and made a decision. But if you voted Yes, No or Not at all without even reading the agreement then I can only question why such people bask in the glory of ignorance. Ignorance of the agreement will only help management not you, and at least you can smell the bullcrap if you keep yourself informed.
The deal offer was over complicated by design, the pension part far from guaranteed and people assumed the Union had won a good deal. Conned and deluded members - given the size of the 9 to 1 vote figure, is an overwhelming vindication in the belief and trust members put in our leadership, because a Philadelphia Lawyer would find it hard to detail any real substance in the deal. Ifs buts and maybes.
-
Sputters2017
- Posts: 79
- Joined: 08 Aug 2017, 16:12
- Gender: Male
VIDEO 5 - FINAL MESSAGE - WE CAUGHT UP WITH TERRY PULLINGER AND ROYAL MAIL'S SUE WHALLEY
Have been a union member for nearly 30 years but cancelled my membership yesterday . I have never felt so let down . I really believe they have no idea of what it is like to do a delivery now days or that they really dont care as they will still be earning 4 -5 times as much a year a postie earns a year.they are looking after them selves.
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 12145
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
VIDEO 5 - FINAL MESSAGE - WE CAUGHT UP WITH TERRY PULLINGER AND ROYAL MAIL'S SUE WHALLEY
Trouble is, would RM ever recognise a new union and if too many people leave the CWU, would they de-recognise the CWU leaving everyone without a union?Navalron wrote:Maybe it's time to start a new union. At least one that has some balls and doesn't bend over and take it from RM on a daily basis. Do these people really believe the carp that they are saying.
-
tommyrep
- Posts: 561
- Joined: 28 Feb 2012, 21:57
- Gender: Male
VIDEO 5 - FINAL MESSAGE - WE CAUGHT UP WITH TERRY PULLINGER AND ROYAL MAIL'S SUE WHALLEY
Very good point.SpacePhoenix wrote:Trouble is, would RM ever recognise a new union and if too many people leave the CWU, would they de-recognise the CWU leaving everyone without a union?Navalron wrote:Maybe it's time to start a new union. At least one that has some balls and doesn't bend over and take it from RM on a daily basis. Do these people really believe the carp that they are saying.
The only way to change the way we are represented is to remove and replace what we have at the moment,with better more grass root people who will adhere to their original principles. Fight hard to protect members welfare and improve T&Cs.
It will take a very long time. There are too many career motivated people running the Union, like many other democratic organisations. People change, many good representatives in the beginning change not always for the better and complacency creeps in. We expect a lot from our Unions and it is not always easy against an organisation that thrives on any divisions. Their work is made easy with splits in our members, much easier with many non members. We proved what can be achieved with the 89% ballot vote and unity within any Union is paramount. Talk of leaving the Union only benefits RM and the downward spiral to total disaster is inevitable.
I do agree our leadership has lost the support and respect of many members and need to concentrate on protecting grassroot problems.
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72671
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
VIDEO 5 - FINAL MESSAGE - WE CAUGHT UP WITH TERRY PULLINGER AND ROYAL MAIL'S SUE WHALLEY
I personally have suggested on here a few times that full-time release reps, and CWU Officers should spend time in the function they represent to get a true understanding of the issues faced by posties. The suggestion is always shot down.Sputters2017 wrote:Have been a union member for nearly 30 years but cancelled my membership yesterday . I have never felt so let down . I really believe they have no idea of what it is like to do a delivery now days or that they really dont care as they will still be earning 4 -5 times as much a year a postie earns a year.they are looking after them selves.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.